Cargando…
Comparison of Esmolol and Dexmedetomidine for Suppression of Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective General Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Double-blinded Study
CONTEXT: Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation lead to strong sympathetic response which may precipitate arrhythmias, myocardial ischemia and cerebrovascular accidents in patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease. AIMS: This study was aimed to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine and esmo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5872877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29628593 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_226_17 |
_version_ | 1783309927984398336 |
---|---|
author | Sharma, Sandeep Suthar, Om Prakash Tak, M. L. Thanvi, Abhilasha Paliwal, Naveen Karnawat, Rakesh |
author_facet | Sharma, Sandeep Suthar, Om Prakash Tak, M. L. Thanvi, Abhilasha Paliwal, Naveen Karnawat, Rakesh |
author_sort | Sharma, Sandeep |
collection | PubMed |
description | CONTEXT: Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation lead to strong sympathetic response which may precipitate arrhythmias, myocardial ischemia and cerebrovascular accidents in patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease. AIMS: This study was aimed to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine and esmolol on hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a prospective, randomized controlled double-blinded study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of ninety patients were selected and randomized into three groups of thirty patients each: Group C received infusion of 20 mL 0.9% normal saline (NS) over 10 min, Group D received infusion of dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg diluted in 20 mL NS over 10 min, and Group E received infusion of esmolol 1.5 mg/kg diluted in 20 mL NS over 10 min. Three minutes after the completion of infusion, patients were induced with general anesthesia. Baseline parameters such as heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), and rate pressure product (RPP) were recorded before administration of study drugs and at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 min after intubation. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: One-way ANOVA was used for comparison among the groups and unpaired t-test was used for comparison within the groups along with Tukey's test for post test analysis. RESULTS: Mean HR, SBP, DBP, MAP, and RPP values remained significantly lower in Group D than that of Group C and Group E at all time intervals up to 10 min after intubation. CONCLUSIONS: Both dexmedetomidine and esmolol suppressed the hemodynamic response to intubation when compared to control group, but dexmedetomidine is more effective than esmolol in maintaining hemodynamic stability following laryngoscopy and intubation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5872877 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58728772018-04-06 Comparison of Esmolol and Dexmedetomidine for Suppression of Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective General Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Double-blinded Study Sharma, Sandeep Suthar, Om Prakash Tak, M. L. Thanvi, Abhilasha Paliwal, Naveen Karnawat, Rakesh Anesth Essays Res Original Article CONTEXT: Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation lead to strong sympathetic response which may precipitate arrhythmias, myocardial ischemia and cerebrovascular accidents in patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease. AIMS: This study was aimed to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine and esmolol on hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a prospective, randomized controlled double-blinded study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of ninety patients were selected and randomized into three groups of thirty patients each: Group C received infusion of 20 mL 0.9% normal saline (NS) over 10 min, Group D received infusion of dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg diluted in 20 mL NS over 10 min, and Group E received infusion of esmolol 1.5 mg/kg diluted in 20 mL NS over 10 min. Three minutes after the completion of infusion, patients were induced with general anesthesia. Baseline parameters such as heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), and rate pressure product (RPP) were recorded before administration of study drugs and at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 min after intubation. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: One-way ANOVA was used for comparison among the groups and unpaired t-test was used for comparison within the groups along with Tukey's test for post test analysis. RESULTS: Mean HR, SBP, DBP, MAP, and RPP values remained significantly lower in Group D than that of Group C and Group E at all time intervals up to 10 min after intubation. CONCLUSIONS: Both dexmedetomidine and esmolol suppressed the hemodynamic response to intubation when compared to control group, but dexmedetomidine is more effective than esmolol in maintaining hemodynamic stability following laryngoscopy and intubation. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5872877/ /pubmed/29628593 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_226_17 Text en Copyright: 2018 © Anesthesia: Essays and Researches http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sharma, Sandeep Suthar, Om Prakash Tak, M. L. Thanvi, Abhilasha Paliwal, Naveen Karnawat, Rakesh Comparison of Esmolol and Dexmedetomidine for Suppression of Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective General Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Double-blinded Study |
title | Comparison of Esmolol and Dexmedetomidine for Suppression of Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective General Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Double-blinded Study |
title_full | Comparison of Esmolol and Dexmedetomidine for Suppression of Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective General Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Double-blinded Study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Esmolol and Dexmedetomidine for Suppression of Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective General Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Double-blinded Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Esmolol and Dexmedetomidine for Suppression of Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective General Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Double-blinded Study |
title_short | Comparison of Esmolol and Dexmedetomidine for Suppression of Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective General Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Double-blinded Study |
title_sort | comparison of esmolol and dexmedetomidine for suppression of hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in adult patients undergoing elective general surgery: a prospective, randomized controlled double-blinded study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5872877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29628593 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_226_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sharmasandeep comparisonofesmololanddexmedetomidineforsuppressionofhemodynamicresponsetolaryngoscopyandendotrachealintubationinadultpatientsundergoingelectivegeneralsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindedstudy AT sutharomprakash comparisonofesmololanddexmedetomidineforsuppressionofhemodynamicresponsetolaryngoscopyandendotrachealintubationinadultpatientsundergoingelectivegeneralsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindedstudy AT takml comparisonofesmololanddexmedetomidineforsuppressionofhemodynamicresponsetolaryngoscopyandendotrachealintubationinadultpatientsundergoingelectivegeneralsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindedstudy AT thanviabhilasha comparisonofesmololanddexmedetomidineforsuppressionofhemodynamicresponsetolaryngoscopyandendotrachealintubationinadultpatientsundergoingelectivegeneralsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindedstudy AT paliwalnaveen comparisonofesmololanddexmedetomidineforsuppressionofhemodynamicresponsetolaryngoscopyandendotrachealintubationinadultpatientsundergoingelectivegeneralsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindedstudy AT karnawatrakesh comparisonofesmololanddexmedetomidineforsuppressionofhemodynamicresponsetolaryngoscopyandendotrachealintubationinadultpatientsundergoingelectivegeneralsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindedstudy |