Cargando…

Comparison of Esmolol and Dexmedetomidine for Suppression of Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective General Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Double-blinded Study

CONTEXT: Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation lead to strong sympathetic response which may precipitate arrhythmias, myocardial ischemia and cerebrovascular accidents in patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease. AIMS: This study was aimed to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine and esmo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Sandeep, Suthar, Om Prakash, Tak, M. L., Thanvi, Abhilasha, Paliwal, Naveen, Karnawat, Rakesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5872877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29628593
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_226_17
_version_ 1783309927984398336
author Sharma, Sandeep
Suthar, Om Prakash
Tak, M. L.
Thanvi, Abhilasha
Paliwal, Naveen
Karnawat, Rakesh
author_facet Sharma, Sandeep
Suthar, Om Prakash
Tak, M. L.
Thanvi, Abhilasha
Paliwal, Naveen
Karnawat, Rakesh
author_sort Sharma, Sandeep
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation lead to strong sympathetic response which may precipitate arrhythmias, myocardial ischemia and cerebrovascular accidents in patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease. AIMS: This study was aimed to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine and esmolol on hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a prospective, randomized controlled double-blinded study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of ninety patients were selected and randomized into three groups of thirty patients each: Group C received infusion of 20 mL 0.9% normal saline (NS) over 10 min, Group D received infusion of dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg diluted in 20 mL NS over 10 min, and Group E received infusion of esmolol 1.5 mg/kg diluted in 20 mL NS over 10 min. Three minutes after the completion of infusion, patients were induced with general anesthesia. Baseline parameters such as heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), and rate pressure product (RPP) were recorded before administration of study drugs and at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 min after intubation. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: One-way ANOVA was used for comparison among the groups and unpaired t-test was used for comparison within the groups along with Tukey's test for post test analysis. RESULTS: Mean HR, SBP, DBP, MAP, and RPP values remained significantly lower in Group D than that of Group C and Group E at all time intervals up to 10 min after intubation. CONCLUSIONS: Both dexmedetomidine and esmolol suppressed the hemodynamic response to intubation when compared to control group, but dexmedetomidine is more effective than esmolol in maintaining hemodynamic stability following laryngoscopy and intubation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5872877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58728772018-04-06 Comparison of Esmolol and Dexmedetomidine for Suppression of Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective General Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Double-blinded Study Sharma, Sandeep Suthar, Om Prakash Tak, M. L. Thanvi, Abhilasha Paliwal, Naveen Karnawat, Rakesh Anesth Essays Res Original Article CONTEXT: Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation lead to strong sympathetic response which may precipitate arrhythmias, myocardial ischemia and cerebrovascular accidents in patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease. AIMS: This study was aimed to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine and esmolol on hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a prospective, randomized controlled double-blinded study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of ninety patients were selected and randomized into three groups of thirty patients each: Group C received infusion of 20 mL 0.9% normal saline (NS) over 10 min, Group D received infusion of dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg diluted in 20 mL NS over 10 min, and Group E received infusion of esmolol 1.5 mg/kg diluted in 20 mL NS over 10 min. Three minutes after the completion of infusion, patients were induced with general anesthesia. Baseline parameters such as heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), and rate pressure product (RPP) were recorded before administration of study drugs and at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 min after intubation. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: One-way ANOVA was used for comparison among the groups and unpaired t-test was used for comparison within the groups along with Tukey's test for post test analysis. RESULTS: Mean HR, SBP, DBP, MAP, and RPP values remained significantly lower in Group D than that of Group C and Group E at all time intervals up to 10 min after intubation. CONCLUSIONS: Both dexmedetomidine and esmolol suppressed the hemodynamic response to intubation when compared to control group, but dexmedetomidine is more effective than esmolol in maintaining hemodynamic stability following laryngoscopy and intubation. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5872877/ /pubmed/29628593 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_226_17 Text en Copyright: 2018 © Anesthesia: Essays and Researches http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sharma, Sandeep
Suthar, Om Prakash
Tak, M. L.
Thanvi, Abhilasha
Paliwal, Naveen
Karnawat, Rakesh
Comparison of Esmolol and Dexmedetomidine for Suppression of Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective General Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Double-blinded Study
title Comparison of Esmolol and Dexmedetomidine for Suppression of Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective General Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Double-blinded Study
title_full Comparison of Esmolol and Dexmedetomidine for Suppression of Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective General Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Double-blinded Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Esmolol and Dexmedetomidine for Suppression of Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective General Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Double-blinded Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Esmolol and Dexmedetomidine for Suppression of Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective General Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Double-blinded Study
title_short Comparison of Esmolol and Dexmedetomidine for Suppression of Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective General Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Double-blinded Study
title_sort comparison of esmolol and dexmedetomidine for suppression of hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in adult patients undergoing elective general surgery: a prospective, randomized controlled double-blinded study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5872877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29628593
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_226_17
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmasandeep comparisonofesmololanddexmedetomidineforsuppressionofhemodynamicresponsetolaryngoscopyandendotrachealintubationinadultpatientsundergoingelectivegeneralsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindedstudy
AT sutharomprakash comparisonofesmololanddexmedetomidineforsuppressionofhemodynamicresponsetolaryngoscopyandendotrachealintubationinadultpatientsundergoingelectivegeneralsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindedstudy
AT takml comparisonofesmololanddexmedetomidineforsuppressionofhemodynamicresponsetolaryngoscopyandendotrachealintubationinadultpatientsundergoingelectivegeneralsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindedstudy
AT thanviabhilasha comparisonofesmololanddexmedetomidineforsuppressionofhemodynamicresponsetolaryngoscopyandendotrachealintubationinadultpatientsundergoingelectivegeneralsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindedstudy
AT paliwalnaveen comparisonofesmololanddexmedetomidineforsuppressionofhemodynamicresponsetolaryngoscopyandendotrachealintubationinadultpatientsundergoingelectivegeneralsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindedstudy
AT karnawatrakesh comparisonofesmololanddexmedetomidineforsuppressionofhemodynamicresponsetolaryngoscopyandendotrachealintubationinadultpatientsundergoingelectivegeneralsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindedstudy