Cargando…

Intraocular Pressure Changes during Laparoscopic Surgery in Trendelenburg Position in Patients Anesthetized with Propofol-based Total Intravenous Anesthesia Compared to Sevoflurane Anesthesia: A Comparative Study

BACKGROUND: Intraocular pressure (IOP) is increased during laparoscopic surgery with Trendelenburg position and may contribute to deleterious effects on optic nerve in susceptible patients. AIMS: The primary objective of this study is to compare the effects of propofol-based total intravenous anesth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaur, Gagandeep, Sharma, Mamta, Kalra, Poonam, Purohit, Shobha, Chauhan, Kanchan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5872896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29628557
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_177_17
_version_ 1783309932383174656
author Kaur, Gagandeep
Sharma, Mamta
Kalra, Poonam
Purohit, Shobha
Chauhan, Kanchan
author_facet Kaur, Gagandeep
Sharma, Mamta
Kalra, Poonam
Purohit, Shobha
Chauhan, Kanchan
author_sort Kaur, Gagandeep
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intraocular pressure (IOP) is increased during laparoscopic surgery with Trendelenburg position and may contribute to deleterious effects on optic nerve in susceptible patients. AIMS: The primary objective of this study is to compare the effects of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with those of sevoflurane anesthesia on IOP in patients undergoing lower abdominal laparoscopic surgery in Trendelenburg position. Secondary objectives are to compare hemodynamic changes, mean arterial pressure (MAP), end-tidal CO(2), and peak inspiratory pressure changes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty patients with physical status American Society of Anesthesiologists classes I and II were randomly allocated in two groups: Group A (propofol) and Group B (sevoflurane). IOP along with other parameters was measured at seven points including baseline (T0), 5 min after induction (T1), 5 min after CO(2) pneumoperitoneum in supine position (T2), 30 min after CO(2) pneumoperitoneum with Trendelenburg position (T3), 5 min after returning to supine position (T4), 5 min after CO(2) desufflation (T5), and 5 min after extubation (T6). RESULTS: The change in IOP was different between the two groups. Maximum rise in IOP was seen at T3, and mean ± standard deviation IOP was 15.5 ± 0.9 mmHg and 19.8 ± 1.2 mmHg in Group A and Group B, respectively (P < 0.01). In Group A (propofol), IOP remained almost equal to the baseline value at T3 and the IOP difference was 0.3 ± 0.9 mmHg less than baseline (statistically insignificant, P > 0.05), while in Group B (sevoflurane), IOP increased significantly at T3 and the difference was 4.0 ± 1.2 mmHg (P < 0.001). The IOP was significantly greater (P < 0.01) from T2 to T6 in sevoflurane group than propofol group. CONCLUSION: Propofol-based TIVA is more effective than inhalational anesthesia with sevoflurane in attenuating the increase in IOP during laparoscopic surgery requiring CO(2) pneumoperitoneum with Trendelenburg position.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5872896
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58728962018-04-06 Intraocular Pressure Changes during Laparoscopic Surgery in Trendelenburg Position in Patients Anesthetized with Propofol-based Total Intravenous Anesthesia Compared to Sevoflurane Anesthesia: A Comparative Study Kaur, Gagandeep Sharma, Mamta Kalra, Poonam Purohit, Shobha Chauhan, Kanchan Anesth Essays Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Intraocular pressure (IOP) is increased during laparoscopic surgery with Trendelenburg position and may contribute to deleterious effects on optic nerve in susceptible patients. AIMS: The primary objective of this study is to compare the effects of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with those of sevoflurane anesthesia on IOP in patients undergoing lower abdominal laparoscopic surgery in Trendelenburg position. Secondary objectives are to compare hemodynamic changes, mean arterial pressure (MAP), end-tidal CO(2), and peak inspiratory pressure changes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty patients with physical status American Society of Anesthesiologists classes I and II were randomly allocated in two groups: Group A (propofol) and Group B (sevoflurane). IOP along with other parameters was measured at seven points including baseline (T0), 5 min after induction (T1), 5 min after CO(2) pneumoperitoneum in supine position (T2), 30 min after CO(2) pneumoperitoneum with Trendelenburg position (T3), 5 min after returning to supine position (T4), 5 min after CO(2) desufflation (T5), and 5 min after extubation (T6). RESULTS: The change in IOP was different between the two groups. Maximum rise in IOP was seen at T3, and mean ± standard deviation IOP was 15.5 ± 0.9 mmHg and 19.8 ± 1.2 mmHg in Group A and Group B, respectively (P < 0.01). In Group A (propofol), IOP remained almost equal to the baseline value at T3 and the IOP difference was 0.3 ± 0.9 mmHg less than baseline (statistically insignificant, P > 0.05), while in Group B (sevoflurane), IOP increased significantly at T3 and the difference was 4.0 ± 1.2 mmHg (P < 0.001). The IOP was significantly greater (P < 0.01) from T2 to T6 in sevoflurane group than propofol group. CONCLUSION: Propofol-based TIVA is more effective than inhalational anesthesia with sevoflurane in attenuating the increase in IOP during laparoscopic surgery requiring CO(2) pneumoperitoneum with Trendelenburg position. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5872896/ /pubmed/29628557 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_177_17 Text en Copyright: 2018 © Anesthesia: Essays and Researches http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kaur, Gagandeep
Sharma, Mamta
Kalra, Poonam
Purohit, Shobha
Chauhan, Kanchan
Intraocular Pressure Changes during Laparoscopic Surgery in Trendelenburg Position in Patients Anesthetized with Propofol-based Total Intravenous Anesthesia Compared to Sevoflurane Anesthesia: A Comparative Study
title Intraocular Pressure Changes during Laparoscopic Surgery in Trendelenburg Position in Patients Anesthetized with Propofol-based Total Intravenous Anesthesia Compared to Sevoflurane Anesthesia: A Comparative Study
title_full Intraocular Pressure Changes during Laparoscopic Surgery in Trendelenburg Position in Patients Anesthetized with Propofol-based Total Intravenous Anesthesia Compared to Sevoflurane Anesthesia: A Comparative Study
title_fullStr Intraocular Pressure Changes during Laparoscopic Surgery in Trendelenburg Position in Patients Anesthetized with Propofol-based Total Intravenous Anesthesia Compared to Sevoflurane Anesthesia: A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Intraocular Pressure Changes during Laparoscopic Surgery in Trendelenburg Position in Patients Anesthetized with Propofol-based Total Intravenous Anesthesia Compared to Sevoflurane Anesthesia: A Comparative Study
title_short Intraocular Pressure Changes during Laparoscopic Surgery in Trendelenburg Position in Patients Anesthetized with Propofol-based Total Intravenous Anesthesia Compared to Sevoflurane Anesthesia: A Comparative Study
title_sort intraocular pressure changes during laparoscopic surgery in trendelenburg position in patients anesthetized with propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia compared to sevoflurane anesthesia: a comparative study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5872896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29628557
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_177_17
work_keys_str_mv AT kaurgagandeep intraocularpressurechangesduringlaparoscopicsurgeryintrendelenburgpositioninpatientsanesthetizedwithpropofolbasedtotalintravenousanesthesiacomparedtosevofluraneanesthesiaacomparativestudy
AT sharmamamta intraocularpressurechangesduringlaparoscopicsurgeryintrendelenburgpositioninpatientsanesthetizedwithpropofolbasedtotalintravenousanesthesiacomparedtosevofluraneanesthesiaacomparativestudy
AT kalrapoonam intraocularpressurechangesduringlaparoscopicsurgeryintrendelenburgpositioninpatientsanesthetizedwithpropofolbasedtotalintravenousanesthesiacomparedtosevofluraneanesthesiaacomparativestudy
AT purohitshobha intraocularpressurechangesduringlaparoscopicsurgeryintrendelenburgpositioninpatientsanesthetizedwithpropofolbasedtotalintravenousanesthesiacomparedtosevofluraneanesthesiaacomparativestudy
AT chauhankanchan intraocularpressurechangesduringlaparoscopicsurgeryintrendelenburgpositioninpatientsanesthetizedwithpropofolbasedtotalintravenousanesthesiacomparedtosevofluraneanesthesiaacomparativestudy