Cargando…

The Role of Nonpharmacological Methods in Attenuation of Pain Due to Peripheral Venous Cannulation: A Randomized Controlled Study

BACKGROUND: Establishing an intravenous access is indispensable for safe administration of anesthesia. Most of the times, it is executed without any analgesia although the pain associated with this procedure is quite agonizing to the patients. AIMS: This study aims to evaluate the role of 3 differen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shivashankar, Archana, Nalini, K. B., Rath, Prapti
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5872897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29628545
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_172_17
_version_ 1783309932623298560
author Shivashankar, Archana
Nalini, K. B.
Rath, Prapti
author_facet Shivashankar, Archana
Nalini, K. B.
Rath, Prapti
author_sort Shivashankar, Archana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Establishing an intravenous access is indispensable for safe administration of anesthesia. Most of the times, it is executed without any analgesia although the pain associated with this procedure is quite agonizing to the patients. AIMS: This study aims to evaluate the role of 3 different nonpharmacological measures such as Valsalva maneuver, flash of light, and distraction method in attenuation of pain during venous cannulation. DESIGN: A clinical randomized controlled study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred patients of either sex, aged between 18 and 65 years, posted for elective surgery were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly allocated into four groups, Group C-control, Group V (valsalva) - blew into sphygmomanometer raising the mercury column up to 30 mm of Hg, Group D (distraction) - pressed a rubber ball and Group L (light) - photographed with a flash of light before venous cannulation. During the process of cannulation, patients were observed and questioned, and pain was graded using a 4- point scale. After the cannulation, pain during the procedure was also assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) score. Data analysis was done using SPSS statistical package version 17. RESULTS: A significant reduction in the incidence of pain was noted in distraction group 36% as compared to 44% in Group L, 46% in Group V, and 100% in the control group. The severity of pain as assessed by 4-point score was significantly lowest in Group D (0.26 ± 0.53) as compared to other three groups (Group V and L = 0.54 ± 0.16, Group C = 1.64 ± 0.6, P < 0.001). Mean VAS score was significantly low in Group D (0.6 ± 1.11) and Group L (0.54 ± 1.06) as compared to Group V (1.26 ± 1.76) and Group C (5.0 ± 1.21, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We conclude that distraction can be considered as a diligent, reasonable, and simple method to attenuate procedural pain during peripheral venous cannulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5872897
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58728972018-04-06 The Role of Nonpharmacological Methods in Attenuation of Pain Due to Peripheral Venous Cannulation: A Randomized Controlled Study Shivashankar, Archana Nalini, K. B. Rath, Prapti Anesth Essays Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Establishing an intravenous access is indispensable for safe administration of anesthesia. Most of the times, it is executed without any analgesia although the pain associated with this procedure is quite agonizing to the patients. AIMS: This study aims to evaluate the role of 3 different nonpharmacological measures such as Valsalva maneuver, flash of light, and distraction method in attenuation of pain during venous cannulation. DESIGN: A clinical randomized controlled study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred patients of either sex, aged between 18 and 65 years, posted for elective surgery were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly allocated into four groups, Group C-control, Group V (valsalva) - blew into sphygmomanometer raising the mercury column up to 30 mm of Hg, Group D (distraction) - pressed a rubber ball and Group L (light) - photographed with a flash of light before venous cannulation. During the process of cannulation, patients were observed and questioned, and pain was graded using a 4- point scale. After the cannulation, pain during the procedure was also assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) score. Data analysis was done using SPSS statistical package version 17. RESULTS: A significant reduction in the incidence of pain was noted in distraction group 36% as compared to 44% in Group L, 46% in Group V, and 100% in the control group. The severity of pain as assessed by 4-point score was significantly lowest in Group D (0.26 ± 0.53) as compared to other three groups (Group V and L = 0.54 ± 0.16, Group C = 1.64 ± 0.6, P < 0.001). Mean VAS score was significantly low in Group D (0.6 ± 1.11) and Group L (0.54 ± 1.06) as compared to Group V (1.26 ± 1.76) and Group C (5.0 ± 1.21, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We conclude that distraction can be considered as a diligent, reasonable, and simple method to attenuate procedural pain during peripheral venous cannulation. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5872897/ /pubmed/29628545 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_172_17 Text en Copyright: 2018 © Anesthesia: Essays and Researches http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shivashankar, Archana
Nalini, K. B.
Rath, Prapti
The Role of Nonpharmacological Methods in Attenuation of Pain Due to Peripheral Venous Cannulation: A Randomized Controlled Study
title The Role of Nonpharmacological Methods in Attenuation of Pain Due to Peripheral Venous Cannulation: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_full The Role of Nonpharmacological Methods in Attenuation of Pain Due to Peripheral Venous Cannulation: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_fullStr The Role of Nonpharmacological Methods in Attenuation of Pain Due to Peripheral Venous Cannulation: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Nonpharmacological Methods in Attenuation of Pain Due to Peripheral Venous Cannulation: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_short The Role of Nonpharmacological Methods in Attenuation of Pain Due to Peripheral Venous Cannulation: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_sort role of nonpharmacological methods in attenuation of pain due to peripheral venous cannulation: a randomized controlled study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5872897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29628545
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_172_17
work_keys_str_mv AT shivashankararchana theroleofnonpharmacologicalmethodsinattenuationofpainduetoperipheralvenouscannulationarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT nalinikb theroleofnonpharmacologicalmethodsinattenuationofpainduetoperipheralvenouscannulationarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT rathprapti theroleofnonpharmacologicalmethodsinattenuationofpainduetoperipheralvenouscannulationarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT shivashankararchana roleofnonpharmacologicalmethodsinattenuationofpainduetoperipheralvenouscannulationarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT nalinikb roleofnonpharmacologicalmethodsinattenuationofpainduetoperipheralvenouscannulationarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT rathprapti roleofnonpharmacologicalmethodsinattenuationofpainduetoperipheralvenouscannulationarandomizedcontrolledstudy