Cargando…
Marginal predation: do encounter or confusion effects explain the targeting of prey group edges?
Marginal predation, also known as the edge effect, occurs when aggregations of prey are preferentially targeted on their periphery by predators and has long been established in many taxa. Two main processes have been used to explain this phenomenon, the confusion effect and the encounter rate betwee...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5873256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29622928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arx090 |
_version_ | 1783310008103993344 |
---|---|
author | Duffield, Callum Ioannou, Christos C |
author_facet | Duffield, Callum Ioannou, Christos C |
author_sort | Duffield, Callum |
collection | PubMed |
description | Marginal predation, also known as the edge effect, occurs when aggregations of prey are preferentially targeted on their periphery by predators and has long been established in many taxa. Two main processes have been used to explain this phenomenon, the confusion effect and the encounter rate between predators and prey group edges. However, it is unknown at what size a prey group needs to be before marginal predation is detectable and to what extent each mechanism drives the effect. We conducted 2 experiments using groups of virtual prey being preyed upon by 3-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) to address these questions. In Experiment 1, we show that group sizes do not need to be large for marginal predation to occur, with this being detectable in groups of 16 or more. In Experiment 2, we find that encounter rate is a more likely explanation for marginal predation than the confusion effect in this system. We find that while confusion does affect predatory behaviors (whether or not predators make an attack), it does not affect marginal predation. Our results suggest that marginal predation is a more common phenomenon than originally thought as it also applies to relatively small groups. Similarly, as marginal predation does not need the confusion effect to occur, it may occur in a wider range of predator–prey species pairings, for example those where the predators search for prey using nonvisual sensory modalities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5873256 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58732562018-04-05 Marginal predation: do encounter or confusion effects explain the targeting of prey group edges? Duffield, Callum Ioannou, Christos C Behav Ecol Original Articles Marginal predation, also known as the edge effect, occurs when aggregations of prey are preferentially targeted on their periphery by predators and has long been established in many taxa. Two main processes have been used to explain this phenomenon, the confusion effect and the encounter rate between predators and prey group edges. However, it is unknown at what size a prey group needs to be before marginal predation is detectable and to what extent each mechanism drives the effect. We conducted 2 experiments using groups of virtual prey being preyed upon by 3-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) to address these questions. In Experiment 1, we show that group sizes do not need to be large for marginal predation to occur, with this being detectable in groups of 16 or more. In Experiment 2, we find that encounter rate is a more likely explanation for marginal predation than the confusion effect in this system. We find that while confusion does affect predatory behaviors (whether or not predators make an attack), it does not affect marginal predation. Our results suggest that marginal predation is a more common phenomenon than originally thought as it also applies to relatively small groups. Similarly, as marginal predation does not need the confusion effect to occur, it may occur in a wider range of predator–prey species pairings, for example those where the predators search for prey using nonvisual sensory modalities. Oxford University Press 2017 2017-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5873256/ /pubmed/29622928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arx090 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Duffield, Callum Ioannou, Christos C Marginal predation: do encounter or confusion effects explain the targeting of prey group edges? |
title | Marginal predation: do encounter or confusion effects explain the targeting of prey group edges? |
title_full | Marginal predation: do encounter or confusion effects explain the targeting of prey group edges? |
title_fullStr | Marginal predation: do encounter or confusion effects explain the targeting of prey group edges? |
title_full_unstemmed | Marginal predation: do encounter or confusion effects explain the targeting of prey group edges? |
title_short | Marginal predation: do encounter or confusion effects explain the targeting of prey group edges? |
title_sort | marginal predation: do encounter or confusion effects explain the targeting of prey group edges? |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5873256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29622928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arx090 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duffieldcallum marginalpredationdoencounterorconfusioneffectsexplainthetargetingofpreygroupedges AT ioannouchristosc marginalpredationdoencounterorconfusioneffectsexplainthetargetingofpreygroupedges |