Cargando…
Modulation of inhibitory control by prefrontal anodal tDCS: A crossover double-blind sham-controlled fMRI study
Prefrontal anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been proposed as a potential approach to improve inhibitory control performance. The functional consequences of tDCS during inhibition tasks remain, however, largely unresolved. We addressed this question by analyzing functional ma...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5874055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29590181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194936 |
_version_ | 1783310093795721216 |
---|---|
author | Sallard, Etienne Mouthon, Michael De Pretto, Michael Spierer, Lucas |
author_facet | Sallard, Etienne Mouthon, Michael De Pretto, Michael Spierer, Lucas |
author_sort | Sallard, Etienne |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prefrontal anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been proposed as a potential approach to improve inhibitory control performance. The functional consequences of tDCS during inhibition tasks remain, however, largely unresolved. We addressed this question by analyzing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) recorded while participants completed a Go/NoGo task after right-lateralized prefrontal anodal tDCS with a crossover, sham-controlled, double-blind experimental design. We replicated previous evidence for an absence of offline effect of anodal stimulation on Go/NoGo performance. The fMRI results revealed a larger increase in right ventrolateral prefrontal activity for Go than NoGo trials in the anodal than sham condition. This pattern suggests that tDCS-induced increases in cortical excitability have larger effects on fMRI activity in regions with a lower task-related engagement. This was the case for the right prefrontal cortex in the Go condition in our task because while reactive inhibition was not engaged during execution trials, the unpredictability of the demand for inhibitory control still incited an engagement of proactive inhibition. Exploratory analyses further revealed that right prefrontal stimulation interacted with task-related functional demands in the supplementary motor area and the thalamus. Our collective results emphasize the dependency of offline tDCS functional effects on the task-related engagement of the stimulated areas and suggest that this factor might partly account for the discrepancies in the functional effects of tDCS observed in previous studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5874055 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58740552018-04-06 Modulation of inhibitory control by prefrontal anodal tDCS: A crossover double-blind sham-controlled fMRI study Sallard, Etienne Mouthon, Michael De Pretto, Michael Spierer, Lucas PLoS One Research Article Prefrontal anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been proposed as a potential approach to improve inhibitory control performance. The functional consequences of tDCS during inhibition tasks remain, however, largely unresolved. We addressed this question by analyzing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) recorded while participants completed a Go/NoGo task after right-lateralized prefrontal anodal tDCS with a crossover, sham-controlled, double-blind experimental design. We replicated previous evidence for an absence of offline effect of anodal stimulation on Go/NoGo performance. The fMRI results revealed a larger increase in right ventrolateral prefrontal activity for Go than NoGo trials in the anodal than sham condition. This pattern suggests that tDCS-induced increases in cortical excitability have larger effects on fMRI activity in regions with a lower task-related engagement. This was the case for the right prefrontal cortex in the Go condition in our task because while reactive inhibition was not engaged during execution trials, the unpredictability of the demand for inhibitory control still incited an engagement of proactive inhibition. Exploratory analyses further revealed that right prefrontal stimulation interacted with task-related functional demands in the supplementary motor area and the thalamus. Our collective results emphasize the dependency of offline tDCS functional effects on the task-related engagement of the stimulated areas and suggest that this factor might partly account for the discrepancies in the functional effects of tDCS observed in previous studies. Public Library of Science 2018-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5874055/ /pubmed/29590181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194936 Text en © 2018 Sallard et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sallard, Etienne Mouthon, Michael De Pretto, Michael Spierer, Lucas Modulation of inhibitory control by prefrontal anodal tDCS: A crossover double-blind sham-controlled fMRI study |
title | Modulation of inhibitory control by prefrontal anodal tDCS: A crossover double-blind sham-controlled fMRI study |
title_full | Modulation of inhibitory control by prefrontal anodal tDCS: A crossover double-blind sham-controlled fMRI study |
title_fullStr | Modulation of inhibitory control by prefrontal anodal tDCS: A crossover double-blind sham-controlled fMRI study |
title_full_unstemmed | Modulation of inhibitory control by prefrontal anodal tDCS: A crossover double-blind sham-controlled fMRI study |
title_short | Modulation of inhibitory control by prefrontal anodal tDCS: A crossover double-blind sham-controlled fMRI study |
title_sort | modulation of inhibitory control by prefrontal anodal tdcs: a crossover double-blind sham-controlled fmri study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5874055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29590181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194936 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sallardetienne modulationofinhibitorycontrolbyprefrontalanodaltdcsacrossoverdoubleblindshamcontrolledfmristudy AT mouthonmichael modulationofinhibitorycontrolbyprefrontalanodaltdcsacrossoverdoubleblindshamcontrolledfmristudy AT deprettomichael modulationofinhibitorycontrolbyprefrontalanodaltdcsacrossoverdoubleblindshamcontrolledfmristudy AT spiererlucas modulationofinhibitorycontrolbyprefrontalanodaltdcsacrossoverdoubleblindshamcontrolledfmristudy |