Cargando…

Simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) spares OAR and reduces treatment time in locally advanced cervical cancer

We performed a dosimetric comparison of sequential IMRT (sIMRT) and simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) IMRT to boost PET‐avid lymph nodes while concurrently treating pelvic targets to determine the potential of SIB IMRT to reduce overall treatment duration in locally advanced cervical cancer. Ten...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feng, Christine H., Hasan, Yasmin, Kopec, Malgorzata, Al‐Hallaq, Hania A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5874085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27685108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i5.6123
_version_ 1783310101003632640
author Feng, Christine H.
Hasan, Yasmin
Kopec, Malgorzata
Al‐Hallaq, Hania A.
author_facet Feng, Christine H.
Hasan, Yasmin
Kopec, Malgorzata
Al‐Hallaq, Hania A.
author_sort Feng, Christine H.
collection PubMed
description We performed a dosimetric comparison of sequential IMRT (sIMRT) and simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) IMRT to boost PET‐avid lymph nodes while concurrently treating pelvic targets to determine the potential of SIB IMRT to reduce overall treatment duration in locally advanced cervical cancer. Ten patients receiving definitive radiation therapy were identified retrospectively. RTOG consensus guidelines were followed to delineate the clinical target volume and organs at risk (OAR), which were then expanded per IMRT consortium guidelines to yield the planning target volume (PTV). Dosimetric parameters for PTVs and OAR including conformity (CI95%) were collected and compared using Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests with Bonferroni correction. The median PTV volume was 1843 cc (1088–2225 cc) and the median boost volume was 43 cc (15–129 cc). Comparable target volume coverage was achieved with sIMRT and SIB plans, while hot spots were significantly reduced using SIB. SIB plans improved sparing for all OAR, though only rectum and small bowel doses were statistically significant. Comparing sIMRT and SIB plans averaged over all patients, rectal doses were V45: 70.8% vs. 64. [Formula: see text] and 0.1 cc: 50.7 Gy vs. 48.7 Gy [Formula: see text]. For small bowel, sIMRT and SIB IMRT plans yielded V45: 13.4% vs. 11. [Formula: see text] and 1 cc: 54.4 Gy vs. 52.6 Gy [Formula: see text] , respectively. Doses to femoral heads and bladder trended towards significance in favor of SIB plans. The mean treatment time was 25 versus 29 days for SIB and sIMRT plans, respectively. When compared to sIMRT, SIB for treatment of nodal targets provides a significant, but small, dose reduction (3.8%–4.4%) to OAR, which leads to comparable biological dose despite higher fractional doses. Furthermore, SIB IMRT reduces overall treatment time and simplifies the planning process, and should be considered for targeting PET‐positive nodal disease in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. PACS number(s): 87.19.xj cancer
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5874085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58740852018-04-02 Simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) spares OAR and reduces treatment time in locally advanced cervical cancer Feng, Christine H. Hasan, Yasmin Kopec, Malgorzata Al‐Hallaq, Hania A. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics We performed a dosimetric comparison of sequential IMRT (sIMRT) and simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) IMRT to boost PET‐avid lymph nodes while concurrently treating pelvic targets to determine the potential of SIB IMRT to reduce overall treatment duration in locally advanced cervical cancer. Ten patients receiving definitive radiation therapy were identified retrospectively. RTOG consensus guidelines were followed to delineate the clinical target volume and organs at risk (OAR), which were then expanded per IMRT consortium guidelines to yield the planning target volume (PTV). Dosimetric parameters for PTVs and OAR including conformity (CI95%) were collected and compared using Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests with Bonferroni correction. The median PTV volume was 1843 cc (1088–2225 cc) and the median boost volume was 43 cc (15–129 cc). Comparable target volume coverage was achieved with sIMRT and SIB plans, while hot spots were significantly reduced using SIB. SIB plans improved sparing for all OAR, though only rectum and small bowel doses were statistically significant. Comparing sIMRT and SIB plans averaged over all patients, rectal doses were V45: 70.8% vs. 64. [Formula: see text] and 0.1 cc: 50.7 Gy vs. 48.7 Gy [Formula: see text]. For small bowel, sIMRT and SIB IMRT plans yielded V45: 13.4% vs. 11. [Formula: see text] and 1 cc: 54.4 Gy vs. 52.6 Gy [Formula: see text] , respectively. Doses to femoral heads and bladder trended towards significance in favor of SIB plans. The mean treatment time was 25 versus 29 days for SIB and sIMRT plans, respectively. When compared to sIMRT, SIB for treatment of nodal targets provides a significant, but small, dose reduction (3.8%–4.4%) to OAR, which leads to comparable biological dose despite higher fractional doses. Furthermore, SIB IMRT reduces overall treatment time and simplifies the planning process, and should be considered for targeting PET‐positive nodal disease in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. PACS number(s): 87.19.xj cancer John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5874085/ /pubmed/27685108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i5.6123 Text en © 2016 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Feng, Christine H.
Hasan, Yasmin
Kopec, Malgorzata
Al‐Hallaq, Hania A.
Simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) spares OAR and reduces treatment time in locally advanced cervical cancer
title Simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) spares OAR and reduces treatment time in locally advanced cervical cancer
title_full Simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) spares OAR and reduces treatment time in locally advanced cervical cancer
title_fullStr Simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) spares OAR and reduces treatment time in locally advanced cervical cancer
title_full_unstemmed Simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) spares OAR and reduces treatment time in locally advanced cervical cancer
title_short Simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) spares OAR and reduces treatment time in locally advanced cervical cancer
title_sort simultaneously integrated boost (sib) spares oar and reduces treatment time in locally advanced cervical cancer
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5874085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27685108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i5.6123
work_keys_str_mv AT fengchristineh simultaneouslyintegratedboostsibsparesoarandreducestreatmenttimeinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancer
AT hasanyasmin simultaneouslyintegratedboostsibsparesoarandreducestreatmenttimeinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancer
AT kopecmalgorzata simultaneouslyintegratedboostsibsparesoarandreducestreatmenttimeinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancer
AT alhallaqhaniaa simultaneouslyintegratedboostsibsparesoarandreducestreatmenttimeinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancer