Cargando…

Consistency of Regions of Interest as nodes of fMRI functional brain networks

The functional network approach, where fMRI BOLD time series are mapped to networks depicting functional relationships between brain areas, has opened new insights into the function of the human brain. In this approach, the choice of network nodes is of crucial importance. One option is to consider...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Korhonen, Onerva, Saarimäki, Heini, Glerean, Enrico, Sams, Mikko, Saramäki, Jari
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MIT Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5874134/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29855622
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/NETN_a_00013
_version_ 1783310111310086144
author Korhonen, Onerva
Saarimäki, Heini
Glerean, Enrico
Sams, Mikko
Saramäki, Jari
author_facet Korhonen, Onerva
Saarimäki, Heini
Glerean, Enrico
Sams, Mikko
Saramäki, Jari
author_sort Korhonen, Onerva
collection PubMed
description The functional network approach, where fMRI BOLD time series are mapped to networks depicting functional relationships between brain areas, has opened new insights into the function of the human brain. In this approach, the choice of network nodes is of crucial importance. One option is to consider fMRI voxels as nodes. This results in a large number of nodes, making network analysis and interpretation of results challenging. A common alternative is to use predefined clusters of anatomically close voxels, Regions of Interest (ROIs). This approach assumes that voxels within ROIs are functionally similar. Because these two approaches result in different network structures, it is crucial to understand what happens to network connectivity when moving from the voxel level to the ROI level. We show that the consistency of ROIs, defined as the mean Pearson correlation coefficient between the time series of their voxels, varies widely in resting-state experimental data. Therefore the assumption of similar voxel dynamics within each ROI does not generally hold. Further, the time series of low-consistency ROIs may be highly correlated, resulting in spurious links in ROI-level networks. Based on these results, we recommend that averaging BOLD signals over anatomically defined ROIs should be carefully considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5874134
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MIT Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58741342018-05-29 Consistency of Regions of Interest as nodes of fMRI functional brain networks Korhonen, Onerva Saarimäki, Heini Glerean, Enrico Sams, Mikko Saramäki, Jari Netw Neurosci Research The functional network approach, where fMRI BOLD time series are mapped to networks depicting functional relationships between brain areas, has opened new insights into the function of the human brain. In this approach, the choice of network nodes is of crucial importance. One option is to consider fMRI voxels as nodes. This results in a large number of nodes, making network analysis and interpretation of results challenging. A common alternative is to use predefined clusters of anatomically close voxels, Regions of Interest (ROIs). This approach assumes that voxels within ROIs are functionally similar. Because these two approaches result in different network structures, it is crucial to understand what happens to network connectivity when moving from the voxel level to the ROI level. We show that the consistency of ROIs, defined as the mean Pearson correlation coefficient between the time series of their voxels, varies widely in resting-state experimental data. Therefore the assumption of similar voxel dynamics within each ROI does not generally hold. Further, the time series of low-consistency ROIs may be highly correlated, resulting in spurious links in ROI-level networks. Based on these results, we recommend that averaging BOLD signals over anatomically defined ROIs should be carefully considered. MIT Press 2017-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5874134/ /pubmed/29855622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/NETN_a_00013 Text en © 2017 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Korhonen, Onerva
Saarimäki, Heini
Glerean, Enrico
Sams, Mikko
Saramäki, Jari
Consistency of Regions of Interest as nodes of fMRI functional brain networks
title Consistency of Regions of Interest as nodes of fMRI functional brain networks
title_full Consistency of Regions of Interest as nodes of fMRI functional brain networks
title_fullStr Consistency of Regions of Interest as nodes of fMRI functional brain networks
title_full_unstemmed Consistency of Regions of Interest as nodes of fMRI functional brain networks
title_short Consistency of Regions of Interest as nodes of fMRI functional brain networks
title_sort consistency of regions of interest as nodes of fmri functional brain networks
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5874134/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29855622
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/NETN_a_00013
work_keys_str_mv AT korhonenonerva consistencyofregionsofinterestasnodesoffmrifunctionalbrainnetworks
AT saarimakiheini consistencyofregionsofinterestasnodesoffmrifunctionalbrainnetworks
AT glereanenrico consistencyofregionsofinterestasnodesoffmrifunctionalbrainnetworks
AT samsmikko consistencyofregionsofinterestasnodesoffmrifunctionalbrainnetworks
AT saramakijari consistencyofregionsofinterestasnodesoffmrifunctionalbrainnetworks