Cargando…

Pemetrexed Continuation Maintenance versus Conventional Platinum-Based Doublet Chemotherapy in EGFR-Negative Lung Adenocarcinoma: Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND: Although targeted therapy and immuno-oncology have shifted the treatment paradigm for lung cancer, platinum-based combination is still the standard of care for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Pemetrexed continuation maintenance therapy has been approved and increasingly used...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paik, Seung Sook, Hwang, In Kyoung, Park, Myung Jae, Lee, Seung Hyeun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5874144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29527843
http://dx.doi.org/10.4046/trd.2017.0090
_version_ 1783310113197522944
author Paik, Seung Sook
Hwang, In Kyoung
Park, Myung Jae
Lee, Seung Hyeun
author_facet Paik, Seung Sook
Hwang, In Kyoung
Park, Myung Jae
Lee, Seung Hyeun
author_sort Paik, Seung Sook
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although targeted therapy and immuno-oncology have shifted the treatment paradigm for lung cancer, platinum-based combination is still the standard of care for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Pemetrexed continuation maintenance therapy has been approved and increasingly used for patients with nonsquamous NSCLC. However, the efficacy of this strategy has not been proven in patients without driving mutations. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical benefit of pemetrexed continuation maintenance to conventional platinum-based doublet in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-negative lung adenocarcinoma. METHODS: A total of 114 patients with EGFR-negative lung adenocarcinoma who were treated with platinum doublet were retrospectively enrolled. We compared the survival rates between patients received pemetrexed maintenance after four-cycled pemetrexed/cisplatin and those received at least four-cycled platinum doublet without maintenance chemotherapy as a first-line treatment. RESULTS: Forty-one patients received pemetrexed maintenance and 73 received conventional platinum doublet. Median progression-free survival (PFS), which was defined as the time from the day of response evaluation after four cycles of chemotherapy to disease progression or death, was significantly higher in the pemetrexed maintenance group compared to conventional group (5.8 months vs. 2.2 months, p<0.001). Median overall survival showed an increasing trend in the pemetrexed maintenance group (22.3 months vs. 16.1 months, p=0.098). Multivariate analyses showed that pemetrexed maintenance chemotherapy was associated with better PFS (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.15–0.87). CONCLUSION: Compared to conventional platinum-based chemotherapy, premetrexed continuation maintenance treatment is associated with better clinical outcome for the patients with EGFR wild-type lung adenocarcinoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5874144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Korean Academy of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58741442018-04-07 Pemetrexed Continuation Maintenance versus Conventional Platinum-Based Doublet Chemotherapy in EGFR-Negative Lung Adenocarcinoma: Retrospective Analysis Paik, Seung Sook Hwang, In Kyoung Park, Myung Jae Lee, Seung Hyeun Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul) Original Article BACKGROUND: Although targeted therapy and immuno-oncology have shifted the treatment paradigm for lung cancer, platinum-based combination is still the standard of care for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Pemetrexed continuation maintenance therapy has been approved and increasingly used for patients with nonsquamous NSCLC. However, the efficacy of this strategy has not been proven in patients without driving mutations. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical benefit of pemetrexed continuation maintenance to conventional platinum-based doublet in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-negative lung adenocarcinoma. METHODS: A total of 114 patients with EGFR-negative lung adenocarcinoma who were treated with platinum doublet were retrospectively enrolled. We compared the survival rates between patients received pemetrexed maintenance after four-cycled pemetrexed/cisplatin and those received at least four-cycled platinum doublet without maintenance chemotherapy as a first-line treatment. RESULTS: Forty-one patients received pemetrexed maintenance and 73 received conventional platinum doublet. Median progression-free survival (PFS), which was defined as the time from the day of response evaluation after four cycles of chemotherapy to disease progression or death, was significantly higher in the pemetrexed maintenance group compared to conventional group (5.8 months vs. 2.2 months, p<0.001). Median overall survival showed an increasing trend in the pemetrexed maintenance group (22.3 months vs. 16.1 months, p=0.098). Multivariate analyses showed that pemetrexed maintenance chemotherapy was associated with better PFS (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.15–0.87). CONCLUSION: Compared to conventional platinum-based chemotherapy, premetrexed continuation maintenance treatment is associated with better clinical outcome for the patients with EGFR wild-type lung adenocarcinoma. The Korean Academy of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases 2018-04 2018-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5874144/ /pubmed/29527843 http://dx.doi.org/10.4046/trd.2017.0090 Text en Copyright©2018. The Korean Academy of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ It is identical to the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Paik, Seung Sook
Hwang, In Kyoung
Park, Myung Jae
Lee, Seung Hyeun
Pemetrexed Continuation Maintenance versus Conventional Platinum-Based Doublet Chemotherapy in EGFR-Negative Lung Adenocarcinoma: Retrospective Analysis
title Pemetrexed Continuation Maintenance versus Conventional Platinum-Based Doublet Chemotherapy in EGFR-Negative Lung Adenocarcinoma: Retrospective Analysis
title_full Pemetrexed Continuation Maintenance versus Conventional Platinum-Based Doublet Chemotherapy in EGFR-Negative Lung Adenocarcinoma: Retrospective Analysis
title_fullStr Pemetrexed Continuation Maintenance versus Conventional Platinum-Based Doublet Chemotherapy in EGFR-Negative Lung Adenocarcinoma: Retrospective Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Pemetrexed Continuation Maintenance versus Conventional Platinum-Based Doublet Chemotherapy in EGFR-Negative Lung Adenocarcinoma: Retrospective Analysis
title_short Pemetrexed Continuation Maintenance versus Conventional Platinum-Based Doublet Chemotherapy in EGFR-Negative Lung Adenocarcinoma: Retrospective Analysis
title_sort pemetrexed continuation maintenance versus conventional platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in egfr-negative lung adenocarcinoma: retrospective analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5874144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29527843
http://dx.doi.org/10.4046/trd.2017.0090
work_keys_str_mv AT paikseungsook pemetrexedcontinuationmaintenanceversusconventionalplatinumbaseddoubletchemotherapyinegfrnegativelungadenocarcinomaretrospectiveanalysis
AT hwanginkyoung pemetrexedcontinuationmaintenanceversusconventionalplatinumbaseddoubletchemotherapyinegfrnegativelungadenocarcinomaretrospectiveanalysis
AT parkmyungjae pemetrexedcontinuationmaintenanceversusconventionalplatinumbaseddoubletchemotherapyinegfrnegativelungadenocarcinomaretrospectiveanalysis
AT leeseunghyeun pemetrexedcontinuationmaintenanceversusconventionalplatinumbaseddoubletchemotherapyinegfrnegativelungadenocarcinomaretrospectiveanalysis