Cargando…
ENDURALIFE-Powered Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Defibrillator Devices for Treating Heart Failure: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance
ENDURALIFE™-powered cardiac resynchronisation therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) devices were the subject of an evaluation by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, through its Medical Technologies Evaluation Programme, for the treatment of heart failure. Boston Scientific (manufacturer)...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5874269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29086228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40258-017-0354-6 |
_version_ | 1783310130194939904 |
---|---|
author | Evans, James Michael Cleves, Andrew Morgan, Helen Millar, Liesl Carolan-Rees, Grace |
author_facet | Evans, James Michael Cleves, Andrew Morgan, Helen Millar, Liesl Carolan-Rees, Grace |
author_sort | Evans, James Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | ENDURALIFE™-powered cardiac resynchronisation therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) devices were the subject of an evaluation by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, through its Medical Technologies Evaluation Programme, for the treatment of heart failure. Boston Scientific (manufacturer) submitted a case for the adoption of the technology, claiming that it has a longer battery life resulting in a longer time to CRT-D replacement. Other claimed benefits were fewer complications associated with replacement procedures, fewer hospital admissions, less time spent in hospital and reduced demand on cardiology device implantation rooms. The submission was critiqued by Cedar, an external assessment centre. The submitted clinical evidence showed that ENDURALIFE-powered devices implanted during the period 2008–2010 were superior, in terms of longevity, to other devices at that time. Submitted economic evidence indicated that, because of a reduction in the need for replacement procedures, ENDURALIFE-powered devices were cost saving when compared to comparator devices. Cedar highlighted uncertainty of the applicability of the clinical evidence to devices marketed today. The Medical Technologies Advisory Committee noted that this was unavoidable due to the follow-up time required to study battery life. Clinical experts noted that increased battery life is an important patient benefit. However, centres use devices from multiple manufacturers to negate pressure on clinical services in the event of a major device recall. The clinical and economic evidence showed benefits to the patient, and further analysis requested by the committee suggested that ENDURALIFE-powered CRT-Ds may save between £2120 and £5627 per patient over 15 years through a reduction in the need for replacement procedures. ENDURALIFE-powered CRT-D devices received a positive recommendation in Medical Technologies Guidance 33. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5874269 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58742692018-03-30 ENDURALIFE-Powered Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Defibrillator Devices for Treating Heart Failure: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance Evans, James Michael Cleves, Andrew Morgan, Helen Millar, Liesl Carolan-Rees, Grace Appl Health Econ Health Policy Review Article ENDURALIFE™-powered cardiac resynchronisation therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) devices were the subject of an evaluation by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, through its Medical Technologies Evaluation Programme, for the treatment of heart failure. Boston Scientific (manufacturer) submitted a case for the adoption of the technology, claiming that it has a longer battery life resulting in a longer time to CRT-D replacement. Other claimed benefits were fewer complications associated with replacement procedures, fewer hospital admissions, less time spent in hospital and reduced demand on cardiology device implantation rooms. The submission was critiqued by Cedar, an external assessment centre. The submitted clinical evidence showed that ENDURALIFE-powered devices implanted during the period 2008–2010 were superior, in terms of longevity, to other devices at that time. Submitted economic evidence indicated that, because of a reduction in the need for replacement procedures, ENDURALIFE-powered devices were cost saving when compared to comparator devices. Cedar highlighted uncertainty of the applicability of the clinical evidence to devices marketed today. The Medical Technologies Advisory Committee noted that this was unavoidable due to the follow-up time required to study battery life. Clinical experts noted that increased battery life is an important patient benefit. However, centres use devices from multiple manufacturers to negate pressure on clinical services in the event of a major device recall. The clinical and economic evidence showed benefits to the patient, and further analysis requested by the committee suggested that ENDURALIFE-powered CRT-Ds may save between £2120 and £5627 per patient over 15 years through a reduction in the need for replacement procedures. ENDURALIFE-powered CRT-D devices received a positive recommendation in Medical Technologies Guidance 33. Springer International Publishing 2017-10-31 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5874269/ /pubmed/29086228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40258-017-0354-6 Text en © The Authors 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Evans, James Michael Cleves, Andrew Morgan, Helen Millar, Liesl Carolan-Rees, Grace ENDURALIFE-Powered Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Defibrillator Devices for Treating Heart Failure: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance |
title | ENDURALIFE-Powered Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Defibrillator Devices for Treating Heart Failure: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance |
title_full | ENDURALIFE-Powered Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Defibrillator Devices for Treating Heart Failure: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance |
title_fullStr | ENDURALIFE-Powered Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Defibrillator Devices for Treating Heart Failure: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance |
title_full_unstemmed | ENDURALIFE-Powered Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Defibrillator Devices for Treating Heart Failure: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance |
title_short | ENDURALIFE-Powered Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Defibrillator Devices for Treating Heart Failure: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance |
title_sort | enduralife-powered cardiac resynchronisation therapy defibrillator devices for treating heart failure: a nice medical technology guidance |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5874269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29086228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40258-017-0354-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT evansjamesmichael enduralifepoweredcardiacresynchronisationtherapydefibrillatordevicesfortreatingheartfailureanicemedicaltechnologyguidance AT clevesandrew enduralifepoweredcardiacresynchronisationtherapydefibrillatordevicesfortreatingheartfailureanicemedicaltechnologyguidance AT morganhelen enduralifepoweredcardiacresynchronisationtherapydefibrillatordevicesfortreatingheartfailureanicemedicaltechnologyguidance AT millarliesl enduralifepoweredcardiacresynchronisationtherapydefibrillatordevicesfortreatingheartfailureanicemedicaltechnologyguidance AT carolanreesgrace enduralifepoweredcardiacresynchronisationtherapydefibrillatordevicesfortreatingheartfailureanicemedicaltechnologyguidance |