Cargando…
Evaluation of Optimized Tube-Gel Methods of Sample Preparation for Large-Scale Plant Proteomics
The so-called tube-gel method is a sample preparation protocol allowing for management of SDS for protein solubilization through in-gel protein trapping. Because of its simplicity, we assumed that once miniaturized, this method could become a standard for large scale experiments. We evaluated the pe...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5874765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29385730 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/proteomes6010006 |
_version_ | 1783310228310196224 |
---|---|
author | Balliau, Thierry Blein-Nicolas, Mélisande Zivy, Michel |
author_facet | Balliau, Thierry Blein-Nicolas, Mélisande Zivy, Michel |
author_sort | Balliau, Thierry |
collection | PubMed |
description | The so-called tube-gel method is a sample preparation protocol allowing for management of SDS for protein solubilization through in-gel protein trapping. Because of its simplicity, we assumed that once miniaturized, this method could become a standard for large scale experiments. We evaluated the performances of two variants of the miniaturized version of the tube-gel method based on different solubilization buffers (Tris-SDS or urea-SDS). To this end, we compared them to two other digestion methods: (i) liquid digestion after protein solubilization in the absence of SDS (liquid method) and (ii) filter-aided sample preparation (FASP). As large-scale experiments may require long term gel storage, we also examined to which extent gel aging affected the results of the proteomics analysis. We showed that both tube-gel and FASP methods extracted membrane proteins better than the liquid method, while the latter allowed the identification and quantification of a greater number of proteins. All methods were equivalent regarding quantitative stability. However, important differences were observed regarding post-translational modifications. In particular, methionine oxidation was higher with the tube-gel method than with the other methods. Based on these results, and considering time, simplicity, and cost aspects, we conclude that the miniaturized tube-gel method is suitable for sample preparation in the context of large-scale experiments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5874765 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58747652018-04-02 Evaluation of Optimized Tube-Gel Methods of Sample Preparation for Large-Scale Plant Proteomics Balliau, Thierry Blein-Nicolas, Mélisande Zivy, Michel Proteomes Article The so-called tube-gel method is a sample preparation protocol allowing for management of SDS for protein solubilization through in-gel protein trapping. Because of its simplicity, we assumed that once miniaturized, this method could become a standard for large scale experiments. We evaluated the performances of two variants of the miniaturized version of the tube-gel method based on different solubilization buffers (Tris-SDS or urea-SDS). To this end, we compared them to two other digestion methods: (i) liquid digestion after protein solubilization in the absence of SDS (liquid method) and (ii) filter-aided sample preparation (FASP). As large-scale experiments may require long term gel storage, we also examined to which extent gel aging affected the results of the proteomics analysis. We showed that both tube-gel and FASP methods extracted membrane proteins better than the liquid method, while the latter allowed the identification and quantification of a greater number of proteins. All methods were equivalent regarding quantitative stability. However, important differences were observed regarding post-translational modifications. In particular, methionine oxidation was higher with the tube-gel method than with the other methods. Based on these results, and considering time, simplicity, and cost aspects, we conclude that the miniaturized tube-gel method is suitable for sample preparation in the context of large-scale experiments. MDPI 2018-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5874765/ /pubmed/29385730 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/proteomes6010006 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Balliau, Thierry Blein-Nicolas, Mélisande Zivy, Michel Evaluation of Optimized Tube-Gel Methods of Sample Preparation for Large-Scale Plant Proteomics |
title | Evaluation of Optimized Tube-Gel Methods of Sample Preparation for Large-Scale Plant Proteomics |
title_full | Evaluation of Optimized Tube-Gel Methods of Sample Preparation for Large-Scale Plant Proteomics |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Optimized Tube-Gel Methods of Sample Preparation for Large-Scale Plant Proteomics |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Optimized Tube-Gel Methods of Sample Preparation for Large-Scale Plant Proteomics |
title_short | Evaluation of Optimized Tube-Gel Methods of Sample Preparation for Large-Scale Plant Proteomics |
title_sort | evaluation of optimized tube-gel methods of sample preparation for large-scale plant proteomics |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5874765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29385730 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/proteomes6010006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT balliauthierry evaluationofoptimizedtubegelmethodsofsamplepreparationforlargescaleplantproteomics AT bleinnicolasmelisande evaluationofoptimizedtubegelmethodsofsamplepreparationforlargescaleplantproteomics AT zivymichel evaluationofoptimizedtubegelmethodsofsamplepreparationforlargescaleplantproteomics |