Cargando…

Evaluation of Optimized Tube-Gel Methods of Sample Preparation for Large-Scale Plant Proteomics

The so-called tube-gel method is a sample preparation protocol allowing for management of SDS for protein solubilization through in-gel protein trapping. Because of its simplicity, we assumed that once miniaturized, this method could become a standard for large scale experiments. We evaluated the pe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Balliau, Thierry, Blein-Nicolas, Mélisande, Zivy, Michel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5874765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29385730
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/proteomes6010006
_version_ 1783310228310196224
author Balliau, Thierry
Blein-Nicolas, Mélisande
Zivy, Michel
author_facet Balliau, Thierry
Blein-Nicolas, Mélisande
Zivy, Michel
author_sort Balliau, Thierry
collection PubMed
description The so-called tube-gel method is a sample preparation protocol allowing for management of SDS for protein solubilization through in-gel protein trapping. Because of its simplicity, we assumed that once miniaturized, this method could become a standard for large scale experiments. We evaluated the performances of two variants of the miniaturized version of the tube-gel method based on different solubilization buffers (Tris-SDS or urea-SDS). To this end, we compared them to two other digestion methods: (i) liquid digestion after protein solubilization in the absence of SDS (liquid method) and (ii) filter-aided sample preparation (FASP). As large-scale experiments may require long term gel storage, we also examined to which extent gel aging affected the results of the proteomics analysis. We showed that both tube-gel and FASP methods extracted membrane proteins better than the liquid method, while the latter allowed the identification and quantification of a greater number of proteins. All methods were equivalent regarding quantitative stability. However, important differences were observed regarding post-translational modifications. In particular, methionine oxidation was higher with the tube-gel method than with the other methods. Based on these results, and considering time, simplicity, and cost aspects, we conclude that the miniaturized tube-gel method is suitable for sample preparation in the context of large-scale experiments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5874765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58747652018-04-02 Evaluation of Optimized Tube-Gel Methods of Sample Preparation for Large-Scale Plant Proteomics Balliau, Thierry Blein-Nicolas, Mélisande Zivy, Michel Proteomes Article The so-called tube-gel method is a sample preparation protocol allowing for management of SDS for protein solubilization through in-gel protein trapping. Because of its simplicity, we assumed that once miniaturized, this method could become a standard for large scale experiments. We evaluated the performances of two variants of the miniaturized version of the tube-gel method based on different solubilization buffers (Tris-SDS or urea-SDS). To this end, we compared them to two other digestion methods: (i) liquid digestion after protein solubilization in the absence of SDS (liquid method) and (ii) filter-aided sample preparation (FASP). As large-scale experiments may require long term gel storage, we also examined to which extent gel aging affected the results of the proteomics analysis. We showed that both tube-gel and FASP methods extracted membrane proteins better than the liquid method, while the latter allowed the identification and quantification of a greater number of proteins. All methods were equivalent regarding quantitative stability. However, important differences were observed regarding post-translational modifications. In particular, methionine oxidation was higher with the tube-gel method than with the other methods. Based on these results, and considering time, simplicity, and cost aspects, we conclude that the miniaturized tube-gel method is suitable for sample preparation in the context of large-scale experiments. MDPI 2018-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5874765/ /pubmed/29385730 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/proteomes6010006 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Balliau, Thierry
Blein-Nicolas, Mélisande
Zivy, Michel
Evaluation of Optimized Tube-Gel Methods of Sample Preparation for Large-Scale Plant Proteomics
title Evaluation of Optimized Tube-Gel Methods of Sample Preparation for Large-Scale Plant Proteomics
title_full Evaluation of Optimized Tube-Gel Methods of Sample Preparation for Large-Scale Plant Proteomics
title_fullStr Evaluation of Optimized Tube-Gel Methods of Sample Preparation for Large-Scale Plant Proteomics
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Optimized Tube-Gel Methods of Sample Preparation for Large-Scale Plant Proteomics
title_short Evaluation of Optimized Tube-Gel Methods of Sample Preparation for Large-Scale Plant Proteomics
title_sort evaluation of optimized tube-gel methods of sample preparation for large-scale plant proteomics
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5874765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29385730
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/proteomes6010006
work_keys_str_mv AT balliauthierry evaluationofoptimizedtubegelmethodsofsamplepreparationforlargescaleplantproteomics
AT bleinnicolasmelisande evaluationofoptimizedtubegelmethodsofsamplepreparationforlargescaleplantproteomics
AT zivymichel evaluationofoptimizedtubegelmethodsofsamplepreparationforlargescaleplantproteomics