Cargando…

Improved electron collimation system design for Elekta linear accelerators

Prototype 10 × 10 and 20 × 20‐cm(2) electron collimators were designed for the Elekta Infinity accelerator (MLCi2 treatment head), with the goal of reducing the trimmer weight of excessively heavy current applicators while maintaining acceptable beam flatness (±3% major axes, ±4% diagonals) and IEC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pitcher, Garrett M., Hogstrom, Kenneth R., Carver, Robert L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5874813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28801965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12155
_version_ 1783310236795273216
author Pitcher, Garrett M.
Hogstrom, Kenneth R.
Carver, Robert L.
author_facet Pitcher, Garrett M.
Hogstrom, Kenneth R.
Carver, Robert L.
author_sort Pitcher, Garrett M.
collection PubMed
description Prototype 10 × 10 and 20 × 20‐cm(2) electron collimators were designed for the Elekta Infinity accelerator (MLCi2 treatment head), with the goal of reducing the trimmer weight of excessively heavy current applicators while maintaining acceptable beam flatness (±3% major axes, ±4% diagonals) and IEC leakage dose. Prototype applicators were designed initially using tungsten trimmers of constant thickness (1% electron transmission) and cross‐sections with inner and outer edges positioned at 95% and 2% off‐axis ratios (OARs), respectively, cast by the upstream collimating component. Despite redefining applicator size at isocenter (not 5 cm upstream) and reducing the energy range from 4–22 to 6–20 MeV, the designed 10 × 10 and 20 × 20‐cm(2) applicator trimmers weighed 6.87 and 10.49 kg, respectively, exceeding that of the current applicators (5.52 and 8.36 kg, respectively). Subsequently, five design modifications using analytical and/or Monte Carlo (MC) calculations were applied, reducing trimmer weight while maintaining acceptable in‐field flatness and mean leakage dose. Design Modification 1 beveled the outer trimmer edges, taking advantage of only low‐energy beams scattering primary electrons sufficiently to reach the outer trimmer edge. Design Modification 2 optimized the upper and middle trimmer distances from isocenter for minimal trimmer weights. Design Modification 3 moved inner trimmer edges inward, reducing trimmer weight. Design Modification 4 determined optimal X‐ray jaw positions for each energy. Design Modification 5 adjusted middle and lower trimmer shapes and reduced upper trimmer thickness by 50%. Design Modifications 1→5 reduced trimmer weights from 6.87→5.86→5.52→5.87→5.43→3.73 kg for the 10 × 10‐cm(2) applicator and 10.49→9.04→8.62→7.73→7.35→5.09 kg for the 20 × 20‐cm(2) applicator. MC simulations confirmed these final designs produced acceptable in‐field flatness and met IEC‐specified leakage dose at 7, 13, and 20 MeV. These results allowed collimation system design for 6 × 6–25 × 25‐cm(2) applicators. Reducing trimmer weights by as much as 4 kg (25 × 25‐cm(2) applicator) should result in easier applicator handling by the radiotherapy team.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5874813
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58748132018-04-02 Improved electron collimation system design for Elekta linear accelerators Pitcher, Garrett M. Hogstrom, Kenneth R. Carver, Robert L. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Prototype 10 × 10 and 20 × 20‐cm(2) electron collimators were designed for the Elekta Infinity accelerator (MLCi2 treatment head), with the goal of reducing the trimmer weight of excessively heavy current applicators while maintaining acceptable beam flatness (±3% major axes, ±4% diagonals) and IEC leakage dose. Prototype applicators were designed initially using tungsten trimmers of constant thickness (1% electron transmission) and cross‐sections with inner and outer edges positioned at 95% and 2% off‐axis ratios (OARs), respectively, cast by the upstream collimating component. Despite redefining applicator size at isocenter (not 5 cm upstream) and reducing the energy range from 4–22 to 6–20 MeV, the designed 10 × 10 and 20 × 20‐cm(2) applicator trimmers weighed 6.87 and 10.49 kg, respectively, exceeding that of the current applicators (5.52 and 8.36 kg, respectively). Subsequently, five design modifications using analytical and/or Monte Carlo (MC) calculations were applied, reducing trimmer weight while maintaining acceptable in‐field flatness and mean leakage dose. Design Modification 1 beveled the outer trimmer edges, taking advantage of only low‐energy beams scattering primary electrons sufficiently to reach the outer trimmer edge. Design Modification 2 optimized the upper and middle trimmer distances from isocenter for minimal trimmer weights. Design Modification 3 moved inner trimmer edges inward, reducing trimmer weight. Design Modification 4 determined optimal X‐ray jaw positions for each energy. Design Modification 5 adjusted middle and lower trimmer shapes and reduced upper trimmer thickness by 50%. Design Modifications 1→5 reduced trimmer weights from 6.87→5.86→5.52→5.87→5.43→3.73 kg for the 10 × 10‐cm(2) applicator and 10.49→9.04→8.62→7.73→7.35→5.09 kg for the 20 × 20‐cm(2) applicator. MC simulations confirmed these final designs produced acceptable in‐field flatness and met IEC‐specified leakage dose at 7, 13, and 20 MeV. These results allowed collimation system design for 6 × 6–25 × 25‐cm(2) applicators. Reducing trimmer weights by as much as 4 kg (25 × 25‐cm(2) applicator) should result in easier applicator handling by the radiotherapy team. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5874813/ /pubmed/28801965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12155 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Pitcher, Garrett M.
Hogstrom, Kenneth R.
Carver, Robert L.
Improved electron collimation system design for Elekta linear accelerators
title Improved electron collimation system design for Elekta linear accelerators
title_full Improved electron collimation system design for Elekta linear accelerators
title_fullStr Improved electron collimation system design for Elekta linear accelerators
title_full_unstemmed Improved electron collimation system design for Elekta linear accelerators
title_short Improved electron collimation system design for Elekta linear accelerators
title_sort improved electron collimation system design for elekta linear accelerators
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5874813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28801965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12155
work_keys_str_mv AT pitchergarrettm improvedelectroncollimationsystemdesignforelektalinearaccelerators
AT hogstromkennethr improvedelectroncollimationsystemdesignforelektalinearaccelerators
AT carverrobertl improvedelectroncollimationsystemdesignforelektalinearaccelerators