Cargando…
A pilot study of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an extremely difficult disease to treat. This pilot study investigates the feasibility of using volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), and compares VMAT to static field intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for five...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5874856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27074478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i2.5980 |
_version_ | 1783310246700122112 |
---|---|
author | Runxiao, Li Yankun, Cao Lan, Wang |
author_facet | Runxiao, Li Yankun, Cao Lan, Wang |
author_sort | Runxiao, Li |
collection | PubMed |
description | Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an extremely difficult disease to treat. This pilot study investigates the feasibility of using volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), and compares VMAT to static field intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for five patients. To identify the best treatment technique for MPM, in five patients, we made a representative comparative analysis of two kinds of techniques for radiation therapy planning: IMRT and VMAT. The plans were created for an Elekta Synergy linear accelerator with 6 MV photons using Oncentra version 4.3 treatment planning system. Dose prescription was 50 Gy to the average of the planning target volume (PTV). PTV coverage and homogeneity, dose of organs at risk, numbers of segments, MUs, and delivery time were evaluated for all techniques. VMAT allowed better homogeneous and conformity indices compared with IMRT ([Formula: see text] vs. 0.12, [Formula: see text] vs. 0.77, respectively, [Formula: see text]). VMAT plan had a significantly shorter delivery time (326 s) compared with in IMRT plans (510 s), ([Formula: see text]). In the dose verification, an average of 93.16% of the detector points passed the 3%/3 mmγ criterion for VMAT plans, while in IMRT plans the dose verification was 95.12%.([Formula: see text]). PACS number(s): 87.55.D, 87.55.km, 87.56.Fc |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5874856 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58748562018-04-02 A pilot study of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma Runxiao, Li Yankun, Cao Lan, Wang J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an extremely difficult disease to treat. This pilot study investigates the feasibility of using volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), and compares VMAT to static field intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for five patients. To identify the best treatment technique for MPM, in five patients, we made a representative comparative analysis of two kinds of techniques for radiation therapy planning: IMRT and VMAT. The plans were created for an Elekta Synergy linear accelerator with 6 MV photons using Oncentra version 4.3 treatment planning system. Dose prescription was 50 Gy to the average of the planning target volume (PTV). PTV coverage and homogeneity, dose of organs at risk, numbers of segments, MUs, and delivery time were evaluated for all techniques. VMAT allowed better homogeneous and conformity indices compared with IMRT ([Formula: see text] vs. 0.12, [Formula: see text] vs. 0.77, respectively, [Formula: see text]). VMAT plan had a significantly shorter delivery time (326 s) compared with in IMRT plans (510 s), ([Formula: see text]). In the dose verification, an average of 93.16% of the detector points passed the 3%/3 mmγ criterion for VMAT plans, while in IMRT plans the dose verification was 95.12%.([Formula: see text]). PACS number(s): 87.55.D, 87.55.km, 87.56.Fc John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5874856/ /pubmed/27074478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i2.5980 Text en © 2016 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Runxiao, Li Yankun, Cao Lan, Wang A pilot study of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma |
title | A pilot study of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma |
title_full | A pilot study of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma |
title_fullStr | A pilot study of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma |
title_full_unstemmed | A pilot study of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma |
title_short | A pilot study of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma |
title_sort | pilot study of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5874856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27074478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i2.5980 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT runxiaoli apilotstudyofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyformalignantpleuralmesothelioma AT yankuncao apilotstudyofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyformalignantpleuralmesothelioma AT lanwang apilotstudyofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyformalignantpleuralmesothelioma AT runxiaoli pilotstudyofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyformalignantpleuralmesothelioma AT yankuncao pilotstudyofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyformalignantpleuralmesothelioma AT lanwang pilotstudyofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyformalignantpleuralmesothelioma |