Cargando…

Assessment of national dosimetry quality audits results for teletherapy machines from 1989 to 2015

The purpose of this study was to ensure accuracy in radiation dose delivery, external dosimetry quality audit has an equal importance with routine dosimetry performed at clinics. To do so, dosimetry quality audit was organized by the Secondary Standard Dosimetry Laboratory (SSDL) of Pakistan Institu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muhammad, Wazir, Ullah, Asad, Mahmood, Khalid, Matiullah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5874894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27538269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i2.5984
_version_ 1783310255129624576
author Muhammad, Wazir
Ullah, Asad
Mahmood, Khalid
Matiullah,
author_facet Muhammad, Wazir
Ullah, Asad
Mahmood, Khalid
Matiullah,
author_sort Muhammad, Wazir
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to ensure accuracy in radiation dose delivery, external dosimetry quality audit has an equal importance with routine dosimetry performed at clinics. To do so, dosimetry quality audit was organized by the Secondary Standard Dosimetry Laboratory (SSDL) of Pakistan Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology (PINSTECH) at the national level to investigate and minimize uncertainties involved in the measurement of absorbed dose, and to improve the accuracy of dose measurement at different radiotherapy hospitals. A total of 181 dosimetry quality audits (i.e., 102 of Co‐60 and 79 of linear accelerators) for teletherapy units installed at 22 different sites were performed from 1989 to 2015. The percent deviation between users’ calculated/stated dose and evaluated dose (in the result of on‐site dosimetry visits) were calculated and the results were analyzed with respect to the limits of [Formula: see text] (ICRU “optimal model”) [Formula: see text] (IAEA on‐site dosimetry visits limit) and [Formula: see text] (ICRU minimal or “lowest acceptable” model). The results showed that out of 181 total on‐site dosimetry visits, 20.44%, 16.02%, and 4.42% were out of acceptable limits of [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] , respectively. The importance of a proper ongoing quality assurance program, recommendations of the followed protocols, and properly calibrated thermometers, pressure gauges, and humidity meters at radiotherapy hospitals are essential in maintaining consistency and uniformity of absorbed dose measurements for precision in dose delivery. PACS number(s): 87.50.cm, 87.50.sj, 87.50.up, 87.50.wj, 87.50.yk, 87.55.km, 87.55.Qr
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5874894
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58748942018-04-02 Assessment of national dosimetry quality audits results for teletherapy machines from 1989 to 2015 Muhammad, Wazir Ullah, Asad Mahmood, Khalid Matiullah, J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The purpose of this study was to ensure accuracy in radiation dose delivery, external dosimetry quality audit has an equal importance with routine dosimetry performed at clinics. To do so, dosimetry quality audit was organized by the Secondary Standard Dosimetry Laboratory (SSDL) of Pakistan Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology (PINSTECH) at the national level to investigate and minimize uncertainties involved in the measurement of absorbed dose, and to improve the accuracy of dose measurement at different radiotherapy hospitals. A total of 181 dosimetry quality audits (i.e., 102 of Co‐60 and 79 of linear accelerators) for teletherapy units installed at 22 different sites were performed from 1989 to 2015. The percent deviation between users’ calculated/stated dose and evaluated dose (in the result of on‐site dosimetry visits) were calculated and the results were analyzed with respect to the limits of [Formula: see text] (ICRU “optimal model”) [Formula: see text] (IAEA on‐site dosimetry visits limit) and [Formula: see text] (ICRU minimal or “lowest acceptable” model). The results showed that out of 181 total on‐site dosimetry visits, 20.44%, 16.02%, and 4.42% were out of acceptable limits of [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] , respectively. The importance of a proper ongoing quality assurance program, recommendations of the followed protocols, and properly calibrated thermometers, pressure gauges, and humidity meters at radiotherapy hospitals are essential in maintaining consistency and uniformity of absorbed dose measurements for precision in dose delivery. PACS number(s): 87.50.cm, 87.50.sj, 87.50.up, 87.50.wj, 87.50.yk, 87.55.km, 87.55.Qr John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5874894/ /pubmed/27538269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i2.5984 Text en © 2016 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Muhammad, Wazir
Ullah, Asad
Mahmood, Khalid
Matiullah,
Assessment of national dosimetry quality audits results for teletherapy machines from 1989 to 2015
title Assessment of national dosimetry quality audits results for teletherapy machines from 1989 to 2015
title_full Assessment of national dosimetry quality audits results for teletherapy machines from 1989 to 2015
title_fullStr Assessment of national dosimetry quality audits results for teletherapy machines from 1989 to 2015
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of national dosimetry quality audits results for teletherapy machines from 1989 to 2015
title_short Assessment of national dosimetry quality audits results for teletherapy machines from 1989 to 2015
title_sort assessment of national dosimetry quality audits results for teletherapy machines from 1989 to 2015
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5874894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27538269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i2.5984
work_keys_str_mv AT muhammadwazir assessmentofnationaldosimetryqualityauditsresultsforteletherapymachinesfrom1989to2015
AT ullahasad assessmentofnationaldosimetryqualityauditsresultsforteletherapymachinesfrom1989to2015
AT mahmoodkhalid assessmentofnationaldosimetryqualityauditsresultsforteletherapymachinesfrom1989to2015
AT matiullah assessmentofnationaldosimetryqualityauditsresultsforteletherapymachinesfrom1989to2015