Cargando…

Patient specific methods for room‐mounted x‐ray imagers for monoscopic/stereoscopic prostate motion monitoring

PURPOSE: To investigate the improvement of combined monoscopic/stereoscopic prostate motion monitoring with room‐mounted dual x‐ray systems by adopting patient specific methods. METHODS: The linac couch was used as a motion stage to simulate 40 highly dynamic real patient prostate trajectories. For...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stevens, M. Tynan R., Parsons, Dave D., Robar, James L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5874929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28470816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12092
_version_ 1783310263367237632
author Stevens, M. Tynan R.
Parsons, Dave D.
Robar, James L.
author_facet Stevens, M. Tynan R.
Parsons, Dave D.
Robar, James L.
author_sort Stevens, M. Tynan R.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate the improvement of combined monoscopic/stereoscopic prostate motion monitoring with room‐mounted dual x‐ray systems by adopting patient specific methods. METHODS: The linac couch was used as a motion stage to simulate 40 highly dynamic real patient prostate trajectories. For each trajectory, 40 s pretreatment and 120 s treatment periods were extracted to represent a typical treatment fraction. Motion was monitored via continuous stereoscopic x‐ray imaging of a single gold fiducial and images were retrospectively divided into periods of stereoscopic and monoscopic imaging to simulate periodic blocking of the room‐mounted system by the gantry during arc‐based therapy. The accuracy of the combined motion monitoring was assessed by comparison with the linac couch log files. To estimate 3‐D marker position during monoscopic imaging, the use of population statistics was compared to both maximum likelihood estimation and stereoscopic localization based estimation of individualized prostate probability density functions (PDFs) from the pretreatment period. The inclusion of intrafraction updating was compared to pretreatment initialization alone. RESULTS: Combined mono/stereoscopic localization was successfully implemented. During the transitions from stereoscopic to monoscopic imaging, fiducial localization exhibits sharp discontinuities when population PDFs were employed. Patient specific PDFs successfully reduced the localization error when estimated from stereoscopic localizations, whereas maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) was too unstable in the room‐mounted geometry. Intrafraction stereoscopic updating provided further increases in accuracy. Residual error tended to decrease throughout the treatment fraction, as the patient‐specific PDFs became more refined. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first demonstration of toggled monoscopic/stereoscopic localization using room‐mounted dual x‐ray imagers, enabling continuous intrafraction motion monitoring for these systems. We showed that both pretreatment individualization and intrafraction updating should be used to provide the most accurate motion monitoring.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5874929
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58749292018-04-02 Patient specific methods for room‐mounted x‐ray imagers for monoscopic/stereoscopic prostate motion monitoring Stevens, M. Tynan R. Parsons, Dave D. Robar, James L. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: To investigate the improvement of combined monoscopic/stereoscopic prostate motion monitoring with room‐mounted dual x‐ray systems by adopting patient specific methods. METHODS: The linac couch was used as a motion stage to simulate 40 highly dynamic real patient prostate trajectories. For each trajectory, 40 s pretreatment and 120 s treatment periods were extracted to represent a typical treatment fraction. Motion was monitored via continuous stereoscopic x‐ray imaging of a single gold fiducial and images were retrospectively divided into periods of stereoscopic and monoscopic imaging to simulate periodic blocking of the room‐mounted system by the gantry during arc‐based therapy. The accuracy of the combined motion monitoring was assessed by comparison with the linac couch log files. To estimate 3‐D marker position during monoscopic imaging, the use of population statistics was compared to both maximum likelihood estimation and stereoscopic localization based estimation of individualized prostate probability density functions (PDFs) from the pretreatment period. The inclusion of intrafraction updating was compared to pretreatment initialization alone. RESULTS: Combined mono/stereoscopic localization was successfully implemented. During the transitions from stereoscopic to monoscopic imaging, fiducial localization exhibits sharp discontinuities when population PDFs were employed. Patient specific PDFs successfully reduced the localization error when estimated from stereoscopic localizations, whereas maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) was too unstable in the room‐mounted geometry. Intrafraction stereoscopic updating provided further increases in accuracy. Residual error tended to decrease throughout the treatment fraction, as the patient‐specific PDFs became more refined. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first demonstration of toggled monoscopic/stereoscopic localization using room‐mounted dual x‐ray imagers, enabling continuous intrafraction motion monitoring for these systems. We showed that both pretreatment individualization and intrafraction updating should be used to provide the most accurate motion monitoring. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5874929/ /pubmed/28470816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12092 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Stevens, M. Tynan R.
Parsons, Dave D.
Robar, James L.
Patient specific methods for room‐mounted x‐ray imagers for monoscopic/stereoscopic prostate motion monitoring
title Patient specific methods for room‐mounted x‐ray imagers for monoscopic/stereoscopic prostate motion monitoring
title_full Patient specific methods for room‐mounted x‐ray imagers for monoscopic/stereoscopic prostate motion monitoring
title_fullStr Patient specific methods for room‐mounted x‐ray imagers for monoscopic/stereoscopic prostate motion monitoring
title_full_unstemmed Patient specific methods for room‐mounted x‐ray imagers for monoscopic/stereoscopic prostate motion monitoring
title_short Patient specific methods for room‐mounted x‐ray imagers for monoscopic/stereoscopic prostate motion monitoring
title_sort patient specific methods for room‐mounted x‐ray imagers for monoscopic/stereoscopic prostate motion monitoring
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5874929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28470816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12092
work_keys_str_mv AT stevensmtynanr patientspecificmethodsforroommountedxrayimagersformonoscopicstereoscopicprostatemotionmonitoring
AT parsonsdaved patientspecificmethodsforroommountedxrayimagersformonoscopicstereoscopicprostatemotionmonitoring
AT robarjamesl patientspecificmethodsforroommountedxrayimagersformonoscopicstereoscopicprostatemotionmonitoring