Cargando…

Effect of VERO pan‐tilt motion on the dose distribution

Tumor tracking is an option for intra‐fractional motion management in radiotherapy. The VERO gimbal tracking system creates a unique beam geometry and understanding the effect of the gimbal motion in terms of dose distribution is important to assess the dose deviation from the reference conditions....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prasetio, Heru, Yohannes, Indra, Bert, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5874935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28585287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12112
_version_ 1783310264530108416
author Prasetio, Heru
Yohannes, Indra
Bert, Christoph
author_facet Prasetio, Heru
Yohannes, Indra
Bert, Christoph
author_sort Prasetio, Heru
collection PubMed
description Tumor tracking is an option for intra‐fractional motion management in radiotherapy. The VERO gimbal tracking system creates a unique beam geometry and understanding the effect of the gimbal motion in terms of dose distribution is important to assess the dose deviation from the reference conditions. Beam profiles, output factors (OF) and percentage depth doses (PDD) were measured and evaluated to investigate this effect. In order to find regions affected by the pan‐tilt motion, synthesized 2D dose distributions were generated. An evaluation of the 2D dose distribution with the reference position was done using dose difference criteria 1%–4%. The OF and point dose at central axis were measured and compared with the reference position. Furthermore, the PDDs were measured using a special monitoring approach to filtering inaccurate points during the acquisition. Beam profiles evaluation showed that the effect of pan‐tilt at inline direction was stronger than at the crossline direction. The maximum average deviation of the full width half maximum (FWHM), flatness, symmetry, penumbra left and right were 0.39 ± 0.25 mm, 0.62 ± 0.50%, 0.76 ± 0.59%, 0.22 ± 0.16 mm, and 0.19 ± 0.15 mm respectively. The ÔF and the measured dose average deviation were <0.5%. The mechanical accuracies during the PDD measurements were 0.28 ± 0.09 mm and 0.21 ± 0.09 mm for pan and tilt and pan or tilt position. The PDD average deviations were 0.58 ± 0.26 % and 0.54 ± 0.25 % for pan‐or‐tilt and pan‐and‐tilt position respectively. All the results showed that the deviation at pan and tilt position are higher than pan or tilt. The most influences were observed for the penumbra region and the shift of radiation beam path.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5874935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58749352018-04-02 Effect of VERO pan‐tilt motion on the dose distribution Prasetio, Heru Yohannes, Indra Bert, Christoph J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Tumor tracking is an option for intra‐fractional motion management in radiotherapy. The VERO gimbal tracking system creates a unique beam geometry and understanding the effect of the gimbal motion in terms of dose distribution is important to assess the dose deviation from the reference conditions. Beam profiles, output factors (OF) and percentage depth doses (PDD) were measured and evaluated to investigate this effect. In order to find regions affected by the pan‐tilt motion, synthesized 2D dose distributions were generated. An evaluation of the 2D dose distribution with the reference position was done using dose difference criteria 1%–4%. The OF and point dose at central axis were measured and compared with the reference position. Furthermore, the PDDs were measured using a special monitoring approach to filtering inaccurate points during the acquisition. Beam profiles evaluation showed that the effect of pan‐tilt at inline direction was stronger than at the crossline direction. The maximum average deviation of the full width half maximum (FWHM), flatness, symmetry, penumbra left and right were 0.39 ± 0.25 mm, 0.62 ± 0.50%, 0.76 ± 0.59%, 0.22 ± 0.16 mm, and 0.19 ± 0.15 mm respectively. The ÔF and the measured dose average deviation were <0.5%. The mechanical accuracies during the PDD measurements were 0.28 ± 0.09 mm and 0.21 ± 0.09 mm for pan and tilt and pan or tilt position. The PDD average deviations were 0.58 ± 0.26 % and 0.54 ± 0.25 % for pan‐or‐tilt and pan‐and‐tilt position respectively. All the results showed that the deviation at pan and tilt position are higher than pan or tilt. The most influences were observed for the penumbra region and the shift of radiation beam path. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5874935/ /pubmed/28585287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12112 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Prasetio, Heru
Yohannes, Indra
Bert, Christoph
Effect of VERO pan‐tilt motion on the dose distribution
title Effect of VERO pan‐tilt motion on the dose distribution
title_full Effect of VERO pan‐tilt motion on the dose distribution
title_fullStr Effect of VERO pan‐tilt motion on the dose distribution
title_full_unstemmed Effect of VERO pan‐tilt motion on the dose distribution
title_short Effect of VERO pan‐tilt motion on the dose distribution
title_sort effect of vero pan‐tilt motion on the dose distribution
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5874935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28585287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12112
work_keys_str_mv AT prasetioheru effectofveropantiltmotiononthedosedistribution
AT yohannesindra effectofveropantiltmotiononthedosedistribution
AT bertchristoph effectofveropantiltmotiononthedosedistribution