Cargando…

Potential benefits of crawl position for prone radiation therapy in breast cancer

PURPOSE: To investigate crawl position with the arm at the treated side alongside the body and at the opposite side above the head for prone treatment in patients requiring breast and regional lymph node irradiation. METHODS: Patient support devices for crawl position were built for CT simulation an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boute, Bert, De Neve, Wilfried, Speleers, Bruno, Van Greveling, Annick, Monten, Christel, Van Hoof, Tom, Van de Velde, Joris, Paelinck, Leen, De Gersem, Werner, Vercauteren, Tom, Detand, Jan, Veldeman, Liv
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5874953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28649708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12118
_version_ 1783310268720218112
author Boute, Bert
De Neve, Wilfried
Speleers, Bruno
Van Greveling, Annick
Monten, Christel
Van Hoof, Tom
Van de Velde, Joris
Paelinck, Leen
De Gersem, Werner
Vercauteren, Tom
Detand, Jan
Veldeman, Liv
author_facet Boute, Bert
De Neve, Wilfried
Speleers, Bruno
Van Greveling, Annick
Monten, Christel
Van Hoof, Tom
Van de Velde, Joris
Paelinck, Leen
De Gersem, Werner
Vercauteren, Tom
Detand, Jan
Veldeman, Liv
author_sort Boute, Bert
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate crawl position with the arm at the treated side alongside the body and at the opposite side above the head for prone treatment in patients requiring breast and regional lymph node irradiation. METHODS: Patient support devices for crawl position were built for CT simulation and treatment. An asymmetric fork design resulted from an iterative process of prototype construction and testing. The fork's large horn supports the hemi‐thorax, shoulder, and elevated arm at the nontreated side and the head. The short, narrow horn supports the arm at the treated side. Between both horns, the treated breast and its regional lymph nodes are exposed. Endpoints were pain, comfort, set‐up precision, beam access to the breast and lymph nodes, and plan dose metrics. Pain and comfort were tested by volunteers (n = 9); set‐up precision, beam access, and plan dose metrics were tested by means of a patient study (n = 10). The AIO™ (Orfit, Wijnegem, Belgium) prone breastboard (AIO™) was used as a reference regarding comfort and set‐up precision. RESULTS: Pain at the sternum, the ipsilateral shoulder, upper arm, and neck was lower in crawl position than with bilateral arm elevation on AIO™. Comfort and set‐up precision were better on the crawl prototype than on AIO™. In crawl position, beam directions in the coronal and near‐sagittal planes have access to the breast or regional lymph nodes without traversing device components. Plan comparison between supine and crawl positions showed better dose homogeneity for the breast and lymph node targets and dose reductions to all organs at risk for crawl position. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation therapy for breast and regional lymph nodes in crawl position is feasible. Good comfort and set‐up precision were demonstrated. Planning results support the hypothesis that breast and regional lymph nodes can be treated in crawl position with less dose to organs at risk and equal or better dose distribution in the target volumes than in supine position. The crawl technique is a candidate methodology for further investigation for patients requiring breast and regional lymph node irradiation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5874953
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58749532018-04-02 Potential benefits of crawl position for prone radiation therapy in breast cancer Boute, Bert De Neve, Wilfried Speleers, Bruno Van Greveling, Annick Monten, Christel Van Hoof, Tom Van de Velde, Joris Paelinck, Leen De Gersem, Werner Vercauteren, Tom Detand, Jan Veldeman, Liv J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: To investigate crawl position with the arm at the treated side alongside the body and at the opposite side above the head for prone treatment in patients requiring breast and regional lymph node irradiation. METHODS: Patient support devices for crawl position were built for CT simulation and treatment. An asymmetric fork design resulted from an iterative process of prototype construction and testing. The fork's large horn supports the hemi‐thorax, shoulder, and elevated arm at the nontreated side and the head. The short, narrow horn supports the arm at the treated side. Between both horns, the treated breast and its regional lymph nodes are exposed. Endpoints were pain, comfort, set‐up precision, beam access to the breast and lymph nodes, and plan dose metrics. Pain and comfort were tested by volunteers (n = 9); set‐up precision, beam access, and plan dose metrics were tested by means of a patient study (n = 10). The AIO™ (Orfit, Wijnegem, Belgium) prone breastboard (AIO™) was used as a reference regarding comfort and set‐up precision. RESULTS: Pain at the sternum, the ipsilateral shoulder, upper arm, and neck was lower in crawl position than with bilateral arm elevation on AIO™. Comfort and set‐up precision were better on the crawl prototype than on AIO™. In crawl position, beam directions in the coronal and near‐sagittal planes have access to the breast or regional lymph nodes without traversing device components. Plan comparison between supine and crawl positions showed better dose homogeneity for the breast and lymph node targets and dose reductions to all organs at risk for crawl position. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation therapy for breast and regional lymph nodes in crawl position is feasible. Good comfort and set‐up precision were demonstrated. Planning results support the hypothesis that breast and regional lymph nodes can be treated in crawl position with less dose to organs at risk and equal or better dose distribution in the target volumes than in supine position. The crawl technique is a candidate methodology for further investigation for patients requiring breast and regional lymph node irradiation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5874953/ /pubmed/28649708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12118 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Boute, Bert
De Neve, Wilfried
Speleers, Bruno
Van Greveling, Annick
Monten, Christel
Van Hoof, Tom
Van de Velde, Joris
Paelinck, Leen
De Gersem, Werner
Vercauteren, Tom
Detand, Jan
Veldeman, Liv
Potential benefits of crawl position for prone radiation therapy in breast cancer
title Potential benefits of crawl position for prone radiation therapy in breast cancer
title_full Potential benefits of crawl position for prone radiation therapy in breast cancer
title_fullStr Potential benefits of crawl position for prone radiation therapy in breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Potential benefits of crawl position for prone radiation therapy in breast cancer
title_short Potential benefits of crawl position for prone radiation therapy in breast cancer
title_sort potential benefits of crawl position for prone radiation therapy in breast cancer
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5874953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28649708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12118
work_keys_str_mv AT boutebert potentialbenefitsofcrawlpositionforproneradiationtherapyinbreastcancer
AT denevewilfried potentialbenefitsofcrawlpositionforproneradiationtherapyinbreastcancer
AT speleersbruno potentialbenefitsofcrawlpositionforproneradiationtherapyinbreastcancer
AT vangrevelingannick potentialbenefitsofcrawlpositionforproneradiationtherapyinbreastcancer
AT montenchristel potentialbenefitsofcrawlpositionforproneradiationtherapyinbreastcancer
AT vanhooftom potentialbenefitsofcrawlpositionforproneradiationtherapyinbreastcancer
AT vandeveldejoris potentialbenefitsofcrawlpositionforproneradiationtherapyinbreastcancer
AT paelinckleen potentialbenefitsofcrawlpositionforproneradiationtherapyinbreastcancer
AT degersemwerner potentialbenefitsofcrawlpositionforproneradiationtherapyinbreastcancer
AT vercauterentom potentialbenefitsofcrawlpositionforproneradiationtherapyinbreastcancer
AT detandjan potentialbenefitsofcrawlpositionforproneradiationtherapyinbreastcancer
AT veldemanliv potentialbenefitsofcrawlpositionforproneradiationtherapyinbreastcancer