Cargando…
Comparison of the recommendations of the AAPM TG‐51 and TG‐51 addendum reference dosimetry protocols
This work quantified differences between recommendations of the TG‐51 and TG‐51 addendum reference dosimetry protocols. Reference dosimetry was performed for flattened photon beams with nominal energies of 6, 10, 15, and 23 MV, as well as flattening‐filter free (FFF) beam energies of 6 and 10 MV, fo...
Autores principales: | McCaw, Travis J., Hwang, Min‐Sig, Jang, Si Young, Huq, M. Saiful |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5874962/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28574211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12110 |
Ejemplares similares
-
TG‐51 reference dosimetry for the Halcyon™: A clinical experience
por: Lloyd, Samantha A.M., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Comparison of AAPM Addendum to TG‐51, IAEA TRS‐398, and JSMP 12: Calibration of photon beams in water
por: Kinoshita, Naoki, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Comparison of IPSM 1990 photon dosimetry code of practice with IAEA TRS‐398 and AAPM TG‐51.
por: Castrillón, Silvia Vargas, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Differences in electron beam dosimetry using two commercial ionization chambers and the TG‐21 protocol: Another reason to switch to TG‐51
por: Followill, David S., et al.
Publicado: (2003) -
Reference Dosimetry according to the New German Protocol DIN 6800-2 and Comparison with IAEA TRS 398 and AAPM TG 51(*)
por: Zakaria, A, et al.
Publicado: (2011)