Cargando…

A review of data in medical request and the patient questionnaire for magnetic resonance evaluation of silicone breast implants

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the quality and quantity of data in the questionnaires and in request forms for magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted with data from 300 medical records. The research used the following data from the questionnaires: patient age, reason for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anger, Jaime, Elias, Pablo Eduardo, Moraes, Paula de Camargo, Hamerschlak, Nelson
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29267430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082017AO4147
_version_ 1783310312649261056
author Anger, Jaime
Elias, Pablo Eduardo
Moraes, Paula de Camargo
Hamerschlak, Nelson
author_facet Anger, Jaime
Elias, Pablo Eduardo
Moraes, Paula de Camargo
Hamerschlak, Nelson
author_sort Anger, Jaime
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To analyze the quality and quantity of data in the questionnaires and in request forms for magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted with data from 300 medical records. The research used the following data from the questionnaires: patient age, reason for the magnetic resonance imaging, reason for placing the breast implant, report of any signs or symptoms, time elapsed since surgery to place the current breast implant, replacement implant surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiation therapy treatments. From the magnetic resonance imaging request forms, information about the breast implant, the implant placement surgery, patient clinical information and ordering physician specialty were verified. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 48.8 years, and the mean time elapsed since breast implant surgery was 5 years. A total of 60% of women in the sample were submitted to aesthetic surgery, while 23.7% were submitted to chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. In the request forms, 23.7% of physicians added some piece of information about the patient, whereas 2.3% of them informed the type of implant and 5.2% informed about the surgery. CONCLUSION: The amount of information in the magnetic resonance imaging request forms is very limited, and this may hinder quality of radiological reports. Institutional and technological measures should be implemented to encourage the requesting physicians and radiologists to share information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5875161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58751612018-03-30 A review of data in medical request and the patient questionnaire for magnetic resonance evaluation of silicone breast implants Anger, Jaime Elias, Pablo Eduardo Moraes, Paula de Camargo Hamerschlak, Nelson Einstein (Sao Paulo) Original Article OBJECTIVE: To analyze the quality and quantity of data in the questionnaires and in request forms for magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted with data from 300 medical records. The research used the following data from the questionnaires: patient age, reason for the magnetic resonance imaging, reason for placing the breast implant, report of any signs or symptoms, time elapsed since surgery to place the current breast implant, replacement implant surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiation therapy treatments. From the magnetic resonance imaging request forms, information about the breast implant, the implant placement surgery, patient clinical information and ordering physician specialty were verified. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 48.8 years, and the mean time elapsed since breast implant surgery was 5 years. A total of 60% of women in the sample were submitted to aesthetic surgery, while 23.7% were submitted to chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. In the request forms, 23.7% of physicians added some piece of information about the patient, whereas 2.3% of them informed the type of implant and 5.2% informed about the surgery. CONCLUSION: The amount of information in the magnetic resonance imaging request forms is very limited, and this may hinder quality of radiological reports. Institutional and technological measures should be implemented to encourage the requesting physicians and radiologists to share information. Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5875161/ /pubmed/29267430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082017AO4147 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Anger, Jaime
Elias, Pablo Eduardo
Moraes, Paula de Camargo
Hamerschlak, Nelson
A review of data in medical request and the patient questionnaire for magnetic resonance evaluation of silicone breast implants
title A review of data in medical request and the patient questionnaire for magnetic resonance evaluation of silicone breast implants
title_full A review of data in medical request and the patient questionnaire for magnetic resonance evaluation of silicone breast implants
title_fullStr A review of data in medical request and the patient questionnaire for magnetic resonance evaluation of silicone breast implants
title_full_unstemmed A review of data in medical request and the patient questionnaire for magnetic resonance evaluation of silicone breast implants
title_short A review of data in medical request and the patient questionnaire for magnetic resonance evaluation of silicone breast implants
title_sort review of data in medical request and the patient questionnaire for magnetic resonance evaluation of silicone breast implants
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29267430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082017AO4147
work_keys_str_mv AT angerjaime areviewofdatainmedicalrequestandthepatientquestionnaireformagneticresonanceevaluationofsiliconebreastimplants
AT eliaspabloeduardo areviewofdatainmedicalrequestandthepatientquestionnaireformagneticresonanceevaluationofsiliconebreastimplants
AT moraespauladecamargo areviewofdatainmedicalrequestandthepatientquestionnaireformagneticresonanceevaluationofsiliconebreastimplants
AT hamerschlaknelson areviewofdatainmedicalrequestandthepatientquestionnaireformagneticresonanceevaluationofsiliconebreastimplants
AT angerjaime reviewofdatainmedicalrequestandthepatientquestionnaireformagneticresonanceevaluationofsiliconebreastimplants
AT eliaspabloeduardo reviewofdatainmedicalrequestandthepatientquestionnaireformagneticresonanceevaluationofsiliconebreastimplants
AT moraespauladecamargo reviewofdatainmedicalrequestandthepatientquestionnaireformagneticresonanceevaluationofsiliconebreastimplants
AT hamerschlaknelson reviewofdatainmedicalrequestandthepatientquestionnaireformagneticresonanceevaluationofsiliconebreastimplants