Cargando…

Evaluation of transversus abdominis plane block for renal transplant recipients – A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of published studies

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing renal transplant (RT) have altered drug/opioid pharmacokinetics. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in renal transplant recipients has been recently evaluated for analgesic and opioid-sparing potential by many trials. METHODOLOGY: The studies comparing TAP-block...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Preet Mohinder, Borle, Anuradha, Makkar, Jeetinder Kaur, Trisha, Aanjan, Sinha, Aashish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29628838
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_598_17
_version_ 1783310322352783360
author Singh, Preet Mohinder
Borle, Anuradha
Makkar, Jeetinder Kaur
Trisha, Aanjan
Sinha, Aashish
author_facet Singh, Preet Mohinder
Borle, Anuradha
Makkar, Jeetinder Kaur
Trisha, Aanjan
Sinha, Aashish
author_sort Singh, Preet Mohinder
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing renal transplant (RT) have altered drug/opioid pharmacokinetics. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in renal transplant recipients has been recently evaluated for analgesic and opioid-sparing potential by many trials. METHODOLOGY: The studies comparing TAP-block to conventional analgesic regimens for RT were searched. Comparisons were made for total opioids consumed (as morphine-equivalents) during the first postoperative 24-h (primary objective), intraoperative, and immediate-postoperative period. Pain scores and postoperative nausea-vomiting (PONV) were also evaluated. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was used to quantify the strength of analysis. RESULTS: Ten-trials with 258 and 237 patients in control and TAP-block group, respectively, were included. TAP-block decreased the 24-h (reported in 9-trials) opioid consumption by 14.61 ± 4.34 mg (reduction by 42.7%, random-effects, P < 0.001, I(2) = 97.82%). Sample size of the present analysis (472) was well past the required “information-size” variable (396) as per the TSA for a power of 85%. Intraoperative opioid consumption also decreased by 2.06 ± 0.63 mg (reduction of 27.8%) (random effects, P < 0.001, I(2) = 98.84%). Pain scores with TAP-block were significantly lower in both early and delayed postoperative phase. Odds ratio for PONV without TAP block was 1.99 ± 1.05 (Fixed-effects, P = 0.04, I(2) = 0%). Publication bias was likely (Egger's test, X-intercept=7.89, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: TAP-block significantly lowers the intraoperative and cumulative postoperative 24-h opioid consumption in RT recipients. Persistent and better pain control is achieved when TAP-Block is used. Benefits of TAP block extend beyond the analgesic actions alone as it also decreases the 24-h incidence of postoperative nausea vomiting as well. The technique of the block needs standardization for RT recipients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5875216
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58752162018-04-07 Evaluation of transversus abdominis plane block for renal transplant recipients – A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of published studies Singh, Preet Mohinder Borle, Anuradha Makkar, Jeetinder Kaur Trisha, Aanjan Sinha, Aashish Saudi J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing renal transplant (RT) have altered drug/opioid pharmacokinetics. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in renal transplant recipients has been recently evaluated for analgesic and opioid-sparing potential by many trials. METHODOLOGY: The studies comparing TAP-block to conventional analgesic regimens for RT were searched. Comparisons were made for total opioids consumed (as morphine-equivalents) during the first postoperative 24-h (primary objective), intraoperative, and immediate-postoperative period. Pain scores and postoperative nausea-vomiting (PONV) were also evaluated. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was used to quantify the strength of analysis. RESULTS: Ten-trials with 258 and 237 patients in control and TAP-block group, respectively, were included. TAP-block decreased the 24-h (reported in 9-trials) opioid consumption by 14.61 ± 4.34 mg (reduction by 42.7%, random-effects, P < 0.001, I(2) = 97.82%). Sample size of the present analysis (472) was well past the required “information-size” variable (396) as per the TSA for a power of 85%. Intraoperative opioid consumption also decreased by 2.06 ± 0.63 mg (reduction of 27.8%) (random effects, P < 0.001, I(2) = 98.84%). Pain scores with TAP-block were significantly lower in both early and delayed postoperative phase. Odds ratio for PONV without TAP block was 1.99 ± 1.05 (Fixed-effects, P = 0.04, I(2) = 0%). Publication bias was likely (Egger's test, X-intercept=7.89, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: TAP-block significantly lowers the intraoperative and cumulative postoperative 24-h opioid consumption in RT recipients. Persistent and better pain control is achieved when TAP-Block is used. Benefits of TAP block extend beyond the analgesic actions alone as it also decreases the 24-h incidence of postoperative nausea vomiting as well. The technique of the block needs standardization for RT recipients. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5875216/ /pubmed/29628838 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_598_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Singh, Preet Mohinder
Borle, Anuradha
Makkar, Jeetinder Kaur
Trisha, Aanjan
Sinha, Aashish
Evaluation of transversus abdominis plane block for renal transplant recipients – A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of published studies
title Evaluation of transversus abdominis plane block for renal transplant recipients – A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of published studies
title_full Evaluation of transversus abdominis plane block for renal transplant recipients – A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of published studies
title_fullStr Evaluation of transversus abdominis plane block for renal transplant recipients – A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of published studies
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of transversus abdominis plane block for renal transplant recipients – A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of published studies
title_short Evaluation of transversus abdominis plane block for renal transplant recipients – A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of published studies
title_sort evaluation of transversus abdominis plane block for renal transplant recipients – a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of published studies
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29628838
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_598_17
work_keys_str_mv AT singhpreetmohinder evaluationoftransversusabdominisplaneblockforrenaltransplantrecipientsametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysisofpublishedstudies
AT borleanuradha evaluationoftransversusabdominisplaneblockforrenaltransplantrecipientsametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysisofpublishedstudies
AT makkarjeetinderkaur evaluationoftransversusabdominisplaneblockforrenaltransplantrecipientsametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysisofpublishedstudies
AT trishaaanjan evaluationoftransversusabdominisplaneblockforrenaltransplantrecipientsametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysisofpublishedstudies
AT sinhaaashish evaluationoftransversusabdominisplaneblockforrenaltransplantrecipientsametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysisofpublishedstudies