Cargando…

Technical note: Correlation between TQA data trends and TomoHD functional status

TomoTherapy Quality Assurance (TQA) is a software package developed to monitor certain aspects of machine performance. In this study, the TQA quantities or data trends most effective in monitoring energy drifts and magnetron stability were determined respectively. This retrospective study used data...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Hervé H.F., Ho, Joan P.Y., Yang, Bin, Cheung, Kin Yin, Yu, Siu Ki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24710441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4548
Descripción
Sumario:TomoTherapy Quality Assurance (TQA) is a software package developed to monitor certain aspects of machine performance. In this study, the TQA quantities or data trends most effective in monitoring energy drifts and magnetron stability were determined respectively. This retrospective study used data collected from three TomoHD units. The TQA modules investigated were Step‐Wedge Helical, Step‐Wedge Static, and Basic Dosimetry. First, the TQA quantities correlated with energy changes ([Formula: see text] , where r is the Pearson's correlation coefficient) were found. The corresponding sensitivities to percentage depth dose (PDD) ratio changes were then calculated and compared. Second, the pulse‐by‐pulse dose stability was compared before and after each magnetron replacement using a nonparametric comparison test (Welch's t‐test), and the raw dose profiles were surveyed. In this study, exit detector flatness obtained in Basic Dosimetry was shown to be the most sensitive [Formula: see text] to energy changes, followed by the energy differences in Step‐Wedge Static [Formula: see text] and Step‐Wedge Helical [Formula: see text]. The three quantities could detect a PDD ratio change of [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] , respectively. Pulse‐by‐Pulse Dose1 from Basic Dosimetry over a one‐week period before and after a magnetron replacement showed a significant difference [Formula: see text] in only three of the nine instances. On the other hand, a raw output profile free from discontinuities, frequent dropped pulses and abnormal spikes was found to indicate that the magnetron would continue to function normally for a week 89% of the time. PACS numbers: 87.56.bd, 87.56.Fc, 84.40.Fe