Cargando…

Evaluation of a commercial cardiac motion phantom for dual‐energy chest radiography

Misregistration due to cardiac motion causes artifacts in two‐exposure dual‐energy subtraction images, in both the soft‐tissue‐only image and the bone‐only image. Two previous investigations have attempted to avoid misregistration artifacts by using cardiac gating of the first and second exposures....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hsieh, Ching‐Yi, Gladish, Gregory, Willis, Charles E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24710435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4508
_version_ 1783310349787725824
author Hsieh, Ching‐Yi
Gladish, Gregory
Willis, Charles E.
author_facet Hsieh, Ching‐Yi
Gladish, Gregory
Willis, Charles E.
author_sort Hsieh, Ching‐Yi
collection PubMed
description Misregistration due to cardiac motion causes artifacts in two‐exposure dual‐energy subtraction images, in both the soft‐tissue‐only image and the bone‐only image. Two previous investigations have attempted to avoid misregistration artifacts by using cardiac gating of the first and second exposures. The severity of misregistration was affected by the heart rate, the time interval between the low‐ and high‐energy exposures, the total duration of the two exposures, and the phase of the cardiac cycle at the start of the exposure sequence. We sought to determine whether a commercial phantom with a simulated beating heart can be use to investigate the factors affecting misregistration in dual‐energy chest radiography. We made dual‐energy images of the phantom in postero–anterior orientation using the indirect digital radiography system (GE XQ/i). We acquired digital images at heart rates between 40 beats per minute and 120 beats per minute and transferred them to a computer, where the area of the artifact on the silhouette of the heart was measured from both soft‐tissue‐only and bone‐only images. For comparison, we measured misregistration in clinical dual‐energy subtraction images by the same method. Generally speaking, without synchronization of the exposure sequence with the cardiac cycle, the area of the misregistration artifact increased with heart rate for both the phantom and clinical images. However, the phantom exaggerated the magnitude of misregistration relative to clinical images. Although this phantom was designed for horizontal operation and computed tomography imaging, it can be use in an upright configuration to simulate heart motion for investigation of dual‐energy misregistration artifacts and control. PACS numbers: 87.59.bf, 87.57.cf, 87.57N
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5875465
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58754652018-04-02 Evaluation of a commercial cardiac motion phantom for dual‐energy chest radiography Hsieh, Ching‐Yi Gladish, Gregory Willis, Charles E. J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging Misregistration due to cardiac motion causes artifacts in two‐exposure dual‐energy subtraction images, in both the soft‐tissue‐only image and the bone‐only image. Two previous investigations have attempted to avoid misregistration artifacts by using cardiac gating of the first and second exposures. The severity of misregistration was affected by the heart rate, the time interval between the low‐ and high‐energy exposures, the total duration of the two exposures, and the phase of the cardiac cycle at the start of the exposure sequence. We sought to determine whether a commercial phantom with a simulated beating heart can be use to investigate the factors affecting misregistration in dual‐energy chest radiography. We made dual‐energy images of the phantom in postero–anterior orientation using the indirect digital radiography system (GE XQ/i). We acquired digital images at heart rates between 40 beats per minute and 120 beats per minute and transferred them to a computer, where the area of the artifact on the silhouette of the heart was measured from both soft‐tissue‐only and bone‐only images. For comparison, we measured misregistration in clinical dual‐energy subtraction images by the same method. Generally speaking, without synchronization of the exposure sequence with the cardiac cycle, the area of the misregistration artifact increased with heart rate for both the phantom and clinical images. However, the phantom exaggerated the magnitude of misregistration relative to clinical images. Although this phantom was designed for horizontal operation and computed tomography imaging, it can be use in an upright configuration to simulate heart motion for investigation of dual‐energy misregistration artifacts and control. PACS numbers: 87.59.bf, 87.57.cf, 87.57N John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5875465/ /pubmed/24710435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4508 Text en © 2014 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Medical Imaging
Hsieh, Ching‐Yi
Gladish, Gregory
Willis, Charles E.
Evaluation of a commercial cardiac motion phantom for dual‐energy chest radiography
title Evaluation of a commercial cardiac motion phantom for dual‐energy chest radiography
title_full Evaluation of a commercial cardiac motion phantom for dual‐energy chest radiography
title_fullStr Evaluation of a commercial cardiac motion phantom for dual‐energy chest radiography
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a commercial cardiac motion phantom for dual‐energy chest radiography
title_short Evaluation of a commercial cardiac motion phantom for dual‐energy chest radiography
title_sort evaluation of a commercial cardiac motion phantom for dual‐energy chest radiography
topic Medical Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24710435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4508
work_keys_str_mv AT hsiehchingyi evaluationofacommercialcardiacmotionphantomfordualenergychestradiography
AT gladishgregory evaluationofacommercialcardiacmotionphantomfordualenergychestradiography
AT willischarlese evaluationofacommercialcardiacmotionphantomfordualenergychestradiography