Cargando…
Assessment of setup uncertainties for various tumor sites when using daily CBCT for more than 2200 VMAT treatments
The aim of this study was assess the patient setup errors for various tumor sites based on clinical data from a sufficient number of treatments with volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using daily pretreatment CBCT imaging guidance. In addition, we calculated and compared the planning target vol...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875470/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24710431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4418 |
_version_ | 1783310350957936640 |
---|---|
author | Oh, Young‐Kee Baek, Jong‐Geun Kim, Ok‐Bae Kim, Jin‐Hee |
author_facet | Oh, Young‐Kee Baek, Jong‐Geun Kim, Ok‐Bae Kim, Jin‐Hee |
author_sort | Oh, Young‐Kee |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was assess the patient setup errors for various tumor sites based on clinical data from a sufficient number of treatments with volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using daily pretreatment CBCT imaging guidance. In addition, we calculated and compared the planning target volume (PTV) margins for all disease sites based on an analysis of specific systematic and random errors in our institution. All patients underwent pretreatment kV‐CBCT imaging. The various tumor sites were divided into four categories; 21 brain (438 fractions), 35 head‐and‐neck tumors (H&N, 933 fractions), 19 thorax and abdomen tumors (T&A, 313 fractions), and 17 prostate cancer tumors (546 fractions). Overall distributions of setup corrections in all directions, frequencies of 3D vector lengths, institution‐specific setup error, and PTV margins were analyzed. The longitudinal distribution for the T&A site represented an asymmetric offset in the negative direction. Rotational distributions were comparable for all treatment sites, and the prostate site had the narrowest distribution of [Formula: see text]. The cumulative frequencies of 3D vector length of ≥ 7 mm were rare for brain lesions and H&N, but more common for T&A and prostate lesions at 25.6% and 12.1%, respectively. The overall mean error for all treatment sites were within [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] , with the exception of the T&A site, which had overall mean error of 2 mm in the negative longitudinal direction. The largest magnitude of systematic error and random error for the brain lesions and H&N was 1.4 mm in the translational directions, and 3.3 mm for T&A and prostate lesions. The PTV margins required in this analysis are ≤ 4 mm for the brain lesions and H&N in all translational directions, but ranged from 4 to 10 mm for T&A and prostate lesions. Analysis of each institution's specific setup errors using daily CBCT is essential for determining PTV margins and reducing setup uncertainties, because setup errors vary according to each immobilization system and patient. PACS number: 87.55.km |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5875470 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58754702018-04-02 Assessment of setup uncertainties for various tumor sites when using daily CBCT for more than 2200 VMAT treatments Oh, Young‐Kee Baek, Jong‐Geun Kim, Ok‐Bae Kim, Jin‐Hee J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The aim of this study was assess the patient setup errors for various tumor sites based on clinical data from a sufficient number of treatments with volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using daily pretreatment CBCT imaging guidance. In addition, we calculated and compared the planning target volume (PTV) margins for all disease sites based on an analysis of specific systematic and random errors in our institution. All patients underwent pretreatment kV‐CBCT imaging. The various tumor sites were divided into four categories; 21 brain (438 fractions), 35 head‐and‐neck tumors (H&N, 933 fractions), 19 thorax and abdomen tumors (T&A, 313 fractions), and 17 prostate cancer tumors (546 fractions). Overall distributions of setup corrections in all directions, frequencies of 3D vector lengths, institution‐specific setup error, and PTV margins were analyzed. The longitudinal distribution for the T&A site represented an asymmetric offset in the negative direction. Rotational distributions were comparable for all treatment sites, and the prostate site had the narrowest distribution of [Formula: see text]. The cumulative frequencies of 3D vector length of ≥ 7 mm were rare for brain lesions and H&N, but more common for T&A and prostate lesions at 25.6% and 12.1%, respectively. The overall mean error for all treatment sites were within [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] , with the exception of the T&A site, which had overall mean error of 2 mm in the negative longitudinal direction. The largest magnitude of systematic error and random error for the brain lesions and H&N was 1.4 mm in the translational directions, and 3.3 mm for T&A and prostate lesions. The PTV margins required in this analysis are ≤ 4 mm for the brain lesions and H&N in all translational directions, but ranged from 4 to 10 mm for T&A and prostate lesions. Analysis of each institution's specific setup errors using daily CBCT is essential for determining PTV margins and reducing setup uncertainties, because setup errors vary according to each immobilization system and patient. PACS number: 87.55.km John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5875470/ /pubmed/24710431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4418 Text en © 2014 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Oh, Young‐Kee Baek, Jong‐Geun Kim, Ok‐Bae Kim, Jin‐Hee Assessment of setup uncertainties for various tumor sites when using daily CBCT for more than 2200 VMAT treatments |
title | Assessment of setup uncertainties for various tumor sites when using daily CBCT for more than 2200 VMAT treatments |
title_full | Assessment of setup uncertainties for various tumor sites when using daily CBCT for more than 2200 VMAT treatments |
title_fullStr | Assessment of setup uncertainties for various tumor sites when using daily CBCT for more than 2200 VMAT treatments |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of setup uncertainties for various tumor sites when using daily CBCT for more than 2200 VMAT treatments |
title_short | Assessment of setup uncertainties for various tumor sites when using daily CBCT for more than 2200 VMAT treatments |
title_sort | assessment of setup uncertainties for various tumor sites when using daily cbct for more than 2200 vmat treatments |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875470/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24710431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4418 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ohyoungkee assessmentofsetupuncertaintiesforvarioustumorsiteswhenusingdailycbctformorethan2200vmattreatments AT baekjonggeun assessmentofsetupuncertaintiesforvarioustumorsiteswhenusingdailycbctformorethan2200vmattreatments AT kimokbae assessmentofsetupuncertaintiesforvarioustumorsiteswhenusingdailycbctformorethan2200vmattreatments AT kimjinhee assessmentofsetupuncertaintiesforvarioustumorsiteswhenusingdailycbctformorethan2200vmattreatments |