Cargando…

Assessment of setup uncertainties for various tumor sites when using daily CBCT for more than 2200 VMAT treatments

The aim of this study was assess the patient setup errors for various tumor sites based on clinical data from a sufficient number of treatments with volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using daily pretreatment CBCT imaging guidance. In addition, we calculated and compared the planning target vol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oh, Young‐Kee, Baek, Jong‐Geun, Kim, Ok‐Bae, Kim, Jin‐Hee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24710431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4418
_version_ 1783310350957936640
author Oh, Young‐Kee
Baek, Jong‐Geun
Kim, Ok‐Bae
Kim, Jin‐Hee
author_facet Oh, Young‐Kee
Baek, Jong‐Geun
Kim, Ok‐Bae
Kim, Jin‐Hee
author_sort Oh, Young‐Kee
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was assess the patient setup errors for various tumor sites based on clinical data from a sufficient number of treatments with volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using daily pretreatment CBCT imaging guidance. In addition, we calculated and compared the planning target volume (PTV) margins for all disease sites based on an analysis of specific systematic and random errors in our institution. All patients underwent pretreatment kV‐CBCT imaging. The various tumor sites were divided into four categories; 21 brain (438 fractions), 35 head‐and‐neck tumors (H&N, 933 fractions), 19 thorax and abdomen tumors (T&A, 313 fractions), and 17 prostate cancer tumors (546 fractions). Overall distributions of setup corrections in all directions, frequencies of 3D vector lengths, institution‐specific setup error, and PTV margins were analyzed. The longitudinal distribution for the T&A site represented an asymmetric offset in the negative direction. Rotational distributions were comparable for all treatment sites, and the prostate site had the narrowest distribution of [Formula: see text]. The cumulative frequencies of 3D vector length of ≥ 7 mm were rare for brain lesions and H&N, but more common for T&A and prostate lesions at 25.6% and 12.1%, respectively. The overall mean error for all treatment sites were within [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] , with the exception of the T&A site, which had overall mean error of 2 mm in the negative longitudinal direction. The largest magnitude of systematic error and random error for the brain lesions and H&N was 1.4 mm in the translational directions, and 3.3 mm for T&A and prostate lesions. The PTV margins required in this analysis are ≤ 4 mm for the brain lesions and H&N in all translational directions, but ranged from 4 to 10 mm for T&A and prostate lesions. Analysis of each institution's specific setup errors using daily CBCT is essential for determining PTV margins and reducing setup uncertainties, because setup errors vary according to each immobilization system and patient. PACS number: 87.55.km
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5875470
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58754702018-04-02 Assessment of setup uncertainties for various tumor sites when using daily CBCT for more than 2200 VMAT treatments Oh, Young‐Kee Baek, Jong‐Geun Kim, Ok‐Bae Kim, Jin‐Hee J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The aim of this study was assess the patient setup errors for various tumor sites based on clinical data from a sufficient number of treatments with volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using daily pretreatment CBCT imaging guidance. In addition, we calculated and compared the planning target volume (PTV) margins for all disease sites based on an analysis of specific systematic and random errors in our institution. All patients underwent pretreatment kV‐CBCT imaging. The various tumor sites were divided into four categories; 21 brain (438 fractions), 35 head‐and‐neck tumors (H&N, 933 fractions), 19 thorax and abdomen tumors (T&A, 313 fractions), and 17 prostate cancer tumors (546 fractions). Overall distributions of setup corrections in all directions, frequencies of 3D vector lengths, institution‐specific setup error, and PTV margins were analyzed. The longitudinal distribution for the T&A site represented an asymmetric offset in the negative direction. Rotational distributions were comparable for all treatment sites, and the prostate site had the narrowest distribution of [Formula: see text]. The cumulative frequencies of 3D vector length of ≥ 7 mm were rare for brain lesions and H&N, but more common for T&A and prostate lesions at 25.6% and 12.1%, respectively. The overall mean error for all treatment sites were within [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] , with the exception of the T&A site, which had overall mean error of 2 mm in the negative longitudinal direction. The largest magnitude of systematic error and random error for the brain lesions and H&N was 1.4 mm in the translational directions, and 3.3 mm for T&A and prostate lesions. The PTV margins required in this analysis are ≤ 4 mm for the brain lesions and H&N in all translational directions, but ranged from 4 to 10 mm for T&A and prostate lesions. Analysis of each institution's specific setup errors using daily CBCT is essential for determining PTV margins and reducing setup uncertainties, because setup errors vary according to each immobilization system and patient. PACS number: 87.55.km John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5875470/ /pubmed/24710431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4418 Text en © 2014 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Oh, Young‐Kee
Baek, Jong‐Geun
Kim, Ok‐Bae
Kim, Jin‐Hee
Assessment of setup uncertainties for various tumor sites when using daily CBCT for more than 2200 VMAT treatments
title Assessment of setup uncertainties for various tumor sites when using daily CBCT for more than 2200 VMAT treatments
title_full Assessment of setup uncertainties for various tumor sites when using daily CBCT for more than 2200 VMAT treatments
title_fullStr Assessment of setup uncertainties for various tumor sites when using daily CBCT for more than 2200 VMAT treatments
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of setup uncertainties for various tumor sites when using daily CBCT for more than 2200 VMAT treatments
title_short Assessment of setup uncertainties for various tumor sites when using daily CBCT for more than 2200 VMAT treatments
title_sort assessment of setup uncertainties for various tumor sites when using daily cbct for more than 2200 vmat treatments
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24710431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4418
work_keys_str_mv AT ohyoungkee assessmentofsetupuncertaintiesforvarioustumorsiteswhenusingdailycbctformorethan2200vmattreatments
AT baekjonggeun assessmentofsetupuncertaintiesforvarioustumorsiteswhenusingdailycbctformorethan2200vmattreatments
AT kimokbae assessmentofsetupuncertaintiesforvarioustumorsiteswhenusingdailycbctformorethan2200vmattreatments
AT kimjinhee assessmentofsetupuncertaintiesforvarioustumorsiteswhenusingdailycbctformorethan2200vmattreatments