Cargando…
Patient radiation exposure during general fluoroscopy examinations
The purpose of this study was to assess the level of patient radiation dose received in general fluoroscopy examinations, compare the findings with the international diagnostic reference levels (IDRLs), and establish the initial institutional (local) LDRLs. A comprehensive survey was conducted for g...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24710443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4555 |
_version_ | 1783310353016291328 |
---|---|
author | Wambani, Jeska S. Korir, Geoffrey K. Tries, Mark A. Korir, Ian K. Sakwa, Jedidah M. |
author_facet | Wambani, Jeska S. Korir, Geoffrey K. Tries, Mark A. Korir, Ian K. Sakwa, Jedidah M. |
author_sort | Wambani, Jeska S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to assess the level of patient radiation dose received in general fluoroscopy examinations, compare the findings with the international diagnostic reference levels (IDRLs), and establish the initial institutional (local) LDRLs. A comprehensive survey was conducted for general fluoroscopy examinations using the medical records of a Radiology Department of a leading regional hospital over a period close to one year. The cumulative reference point air kerma [Formula: see text] , kerma area product (KAP) and fluoroscopy time (FT) were recorded for six hundred and fifty (30% pediatric and 70% adult) patients undergoing routine fluoroscopy examinations using X‐ray equipment with built‐in integrated dose measuring system. Results which were obtained for adult general fluoroscopy indicated that 83% and 33% were below the IDRLs for KAP and fluoroscopy time, respectively. In children, 60% were found to be below the only available KAP diagnostic reference levels. Local diagnostic reference levels (LDRLs) have been proposed with respect to the missing DRLs for the K(a r), KAP, and fluoroscopy time. The majority of the examinations in the study were performed with longer fluoroscopy time, patient dose values per examination type were found to be broad and the mean values above the international diagnostic reference levels. This calls for proper and improved training and radiation protection skills for the responsible personnel, especially the equipment operators. PACS numbers: 87.53.Bn, 87.59.C‐, 87.59.cf, 87.53.Bn, 87.50.‐a, 87.53.‐j |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5875479 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58754792018-04-02 Patient radiation exposure during general fluoroscopy examinations Wambani, Jeska S. Korir, Geoffrey K. Tries, Mark A. Korir, Ian K. Sakwa, Jedidah M. J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging The purpose of this study was to assess the level of patient radiation dose received in general fluoroscopy examinations, compare the findings with the international diagnostic reference levels (IDRLs), and establish the initial institutional (local) LDRLs. A comprehensive survey was conducted for general fluoroscopy examinations using the medical records of a Radiology Department of a leading regional hospital over a period close to one year. The cumulative reference point air kerma [Formula: see text] , kerma area product (KAP) and fluoroscopy time (FT) were recorded for six hundred and fifty (30% pediatric and 70% adult) patients undergoing routine fluoroscopy examinations using X‐ray equipment with built‐in integrated dose measuring system. Results which were obtained for adult general fluoroscopy indicated that 83% and 33% were below the IDRLs for KAP and fluoroscopy time, respectively. In children, 60% were found to be below the only available KAP diagnostic reference levels. Local diagnostic reference levels (LDRLs) have been proposed with respect to the missing DRLs for the K(a r), KAP, and fluoroscopy time. The majority of the examinations in the study were performed with longer fluoroscopy time, patient dose values per examination type were found to be broad and the mean values above the international diagnostic reference levels. This calls for proper and improved training and radiation protection skills for the responsible personnel, especially the equipment operators. PACS numbers: 87.53.Bn, 87.59.C‐, 87.59.cf, 87.53.Bn, 87.50.‐a, 87.53.‐j John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5875479/ /pubmed/24710443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4555 Text en © 2014 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Medical Imaging Wambani, Jeska S. Korir, Geoffrey K. Tries, Mark A. Korir, Ian K. Sakwa, Jedidah M. Patient radiation exposure during general fluoroscopy examinations |
title | Patient radiation exposure during general fluoroscopy examinations |
title_full | Patient radiation exposure during general fluoroscopy examinations |
title_fullStr | Patient radiation exposure during general fluoroscopy examinations |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient radiation exposure during general fluoroscopy examinations |
title_short | Patient radiation exposure during general fluoroscopy examinations |
title_sort | patient radiation exposure during general fluoroscopy examinations |
topic | Medical Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24710443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4555 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wambanijeskas patientradiationexposureduringgeneralfluoroscopyexaminations AT korirgeoffreyk patientradiationexposureduringgeneralfluoroscopyexaminations AT triesmarka patientradiationexposureduringgeneralfluoroscopyexaminations AT koririank patientradiationexposureduringgeneralfluoroscopyexaminations AT sakwajedidahm patientradiationexposureduringgeneralfluoroscopyexaminations |