Cargando…

Patient radiation exposure during general fluoroscopy examinations

The purpose of this study was to assess the level of patient radiation dose received in general fluoroscopy examinations, compare the findings with the international diagnostic reference levels (IDRLs), and establish the initial institutional (local) LDRLs. A comprehensive survey was conducted for g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wambani, Jeska S., Korir, Geoffrey K., Tries, Mark A., Korir, Ian K., Sakwa, Jedidah M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24710443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4555
_version_ 1783310353016291328
author Wambani, Jeska S.
Korir, Geoffrey K.
Tries, Mark A.
Korir, Ian K.
Sakwa, Jedidah M.
author_facet Wambani, Jeska S.
Korir, Geoffrey K.
Tries, Mark A.
Korir, Ian K.
Sakwa, Jedidah M.
author_sort Wambani, Jeska S.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to assess the level of patient radiation dose received in general fluoroscopy examinations, compare the findings with the international diagnostic reference levels (IDRLs), and establish the initial institutional (local) LDRLs. A comprehensive survey was conducted for general fluoroscopy examinations using the medical records of a Radiology Department of a leading regional hospital over a period close to one year. The cumulative reference point air kerma [Formula: see text] , kerma area product (KAP) and fluoroscopy time (FT) were recorded for six hundred and fifty (30% pediatric and 70% adult) patients undergoing routine fluoroscopy examinations using X‐ray equipment with built‐in integrated dose measuring system. Results which were obtained for adult general fluoroscopy indicated that 83% and 33% were below the IDRLs for KAP and fluoroscopy time, respectively. In children, 60% were found to be below the only available KAP diagnostic reference levels. Local diagnostic reference levels (LDRLs) have been proposed with respect to the missing DRLs for the K(a r), KAP, and fluoroscopy time. The majority of the examinations in the study were performed with longer fluoroscopy time, patient dose values per examination type were found to be broad and the mean values above the international diagnostic reference levels. This calls for proper and improved training and radiation protection skills for the responsible personnel, especially the equipment operators. PACS numbers: 87.53.Bn, 87.59.C‐, 87.59.cf, 87.53.Bn, 87.50.‐a, 87.53.‐j
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5875479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58754792018-04-02 Patient radiation exposure during general fluoroscopy examinations Wambani, Jeska S. Korir, Geoffrey K. Tries, Mark A. Korir, Ian K. Sakwa, Jedidah M. J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging The purpose of this study was to assess the level of patient radiation dose received in general fluoroscopy examinations, compare the findings with the international diagnostic reference levels (IDRLs), and establish the initial institutional (local) LDRLs. A comprehensive survey was conducted for general fluoroscopy examinations using the medical records of a Radiology Department of a leading regional hospital over a period close to one year. The cumulative reference point air kerma [Formula: see text] , kerma area product (KAP) and fluoroscopy time (FT) were recorded for six hundred and fifty (30% pediatric and 70% adult) patients undergoing routine fluoroscopy examinations using X‐ray equipment with built‐in integrated dose measuring system. Results which were obtained for adult general fluoroscopy indicated that 83% and 33% were below the IDRLs for KAP and fluoroscopy time, respectively. In children, 60% were found to be below the only available KAP diagnostic reference levels. Local diagnostic reference levels (LDRLs) have been proposed with respect to the missing DRLs for the K(a r), KAP, and fluoroscopy time. The majority of the examinations in the study were performed with longer fluoroscopy time, patient dose values per examination type were found to be broad and the mean values above the international diagnostic reference levels. This calls for proper and improved training and radiation protection skills for the responsible personnel, especially the equipment operators. PACS numbers: 87.53.Bn, 87.59.C‐, 87.59.cf, 87.53.Bn, 87.50.‐a, 87.53.‐j John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5875479/ /pubmed/24710443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4555 Text en © 2014 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Medical Imaging
Wambani, Jeska S.
Korir, Geoffrey K.
Tries, Mark A.
Korir, Ian K.
Sakwa, Jedidah M.
Patient radiation exposure during general fluoroscopy examinations
title Patient radiation exposure during general fluoroscopy examinations
title_full Patient radiation exposure during general fluoroscopy examinations
title_fullStr Patient radiation exposure during general fluoroscopy examinations
title_full_unstemmed Patient radiation exposure during general fluoroscopy examinations
title_short Patient radiation exposure during general fluoroscopy examinations
title_sort patient radiation exposure during general fluoroscopy examinations
topic Medical Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24710443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4555
work_keys_str_mv AT wambanijeskas patientradiationexposureduringgeneralfluoroscopyexaminations
AT korirgeoffreyk patientradiationexposureduringgeneralfluoroscopyexaminations
AT triesmarka patientradiationexposureduringgeneralfluoroscopyexaminations
AT koririank patientradiationexposureduringgeneralfluoroscopyexaminations
AT sakwajedidahm patientradiationexposureduringgeneralfluoroscopyexaminations