Cargando…
Efficiency of biological versus physical optimization for single‐arc VMAT for prostate and head and neck cases
The aim of this work was to compare different approaches to VMAT optimization (biological vs. physical DVH‐based) in two commercial treatment planning systems (TPS) for head and neck and prostate cases, using Pareto fronts. VMAT vs. IMRT Pareto front comparison was additionally performed in order to...
Autores principales: | Pyshniak, Vadzim, Fotina, Irina, Zverava, Alena, Siamkouski, Stanislau, Zayats, Elena, Kopanitsa, Georgy, Okuntsau, Dzmitry |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25207394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i4.4514 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Exploratory study of the association of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan robustness with local failure in head and neck cancer
por: Liu, Wei, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Evaluation of auto‐planning in IMRT and VMAT for head and neck cancer
por: Ouyang, Zi, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
HyperArc VMAT stereotactic radiotherapy for locally recurrent previously‐irradiated head and neck cancers: Plan quality, treatment delivery accuracy, and efficiency
por: Pokhrel, Damodar, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Algorithm for an automatic treatment planning system using a single‐arc VMAT for prostate cancer
por: Kodama, Takumi, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Skin/mucosa avoidance radiotherapy (SMART) versus conventional volumetric arc‐based radiotherapy (VMAT) for the treatment of head and neck cancer: Dosimetric feasibility study
por: Anderson, Cheryl, et al.
Publicado: (2023)