Cargando…
A simple model for predicting the signal for a head‐mounted transmission chamber system, allowing IMRT in‐vivo dosimetry without pretreatment linac time
The DAVID is a transparent, multi‐wire transmission‐style detector that attaches to a linear accelerator (linac) collimator for use as an in vivo detector. Currently, the normal method for using the DAVID is to measure a signal at the time of phantom‐based pretreatment verification and use that sign...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25207413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i4.4842 |
_version_ | 1783310358868393984 |
---|---|
author | Johnson, Daniel Weston, Steven J. Cosgrove, Vivian P. Thwaites, David I. |
author_facet | Johnson, Daniel Weston, Steven J. Cosgrove, Vivian P. Thwaites, David I. |
author_sort | Johnson, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | The DAVID is a transparent, multi‐wire transmission‐style detector that attaches to a linear accelerator (linac) collimator for use as an in vivo detector. Currently, the normal method for using the DAVID is to measure a signal at the time of phantom‐based pretreatment verification and use that signal as a baseline to compare with in vivo measurements for subsequent treatment fractions. The device has previously been shown to be both stable and accurate. (1) , (2) This work presents the development of a predictive algorithm for the expected signal, eradicating the need to spend time on the linac prior to treatment, and thereby making the process more efficient. The DAVID response at each wire is a consequence of both primary radiation, from the leaf pair associated with the wire, and scatter radiation as a result of radiation incident on other parts of the detector scattering in the Perspex plate. The primary radiation was shown to be linearly proportional to both leaf separation and delivered monitor units (MU). The scatter signal dropped off exponentially with regard to distance. Both of these effects were modeled; the resulting algorithm was used to predict the response from ten five‐field IMRT head and neck plans. The system predicted all DAVID signals to within 5%, and was able to detect artificially generated changes in linac output. Having shown that the algorithm works, a new working paradigm is suggested, and the errors that can be detected are outlined. PACS number: 87.55.N |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5875507 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58755072018-04-02 A simple model for predicting the signal for a head‐mounted transmission chamber system, allowing IMRT in‐vivo dosimetry without pretreatment linac time Johnson, Daniel Weston, Steven J. Cosgrove, Vivian P. Thwaites, David I. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The DAVID is a transparent, multi‐wire transmission‐style detector that attaches to a linear accelerator (linac) collimator for use as an in vivo detector. Currently, the normal method for using the DAVID is to measure a signal at the time of phantom‐based pretreatment verification and use that signal as a baseline to compare with in vivo measurements for subsequent treatment fractions. The device has previously been shown to be both stable and accurate. (1) , (2) This work presents the development of a predictive algorithm for the expected signal, eradicating the need to spend time on the linac prior to treatment, and thereby making the process more efficient. The DAVID response at each wire is a consequence of both primary radiation, from the leaf pair associated with the wire, and scatter radiation as a result of radiation incident on other parts of the detector scattering in the Perspex plate. The primary radiation was shown to be linearly proportional to both leaf separation and delivered monitor units (MU). The scatter signal dropped off exponentially with regard to distance. Both of these effects were modeled; the resulting algorithm was used to predict the response from ten five‐field IMRT head and neck plans. The system predicted all DAVID signals to within 5%, and was able to detect artificially generated changes in linac output. Having shown that the algorithm works, a new working paradigm is suggested, and the errors that can be detected are outlined. PACS number: 87.55.N John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5875507/ /pubmed/25207413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i4.4842 Text en © 2014 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Johnson, Daniel Weston, Steven J. Cosgrove, Vivian P. Thwaites, David I. A simple model for predicting the signal for a head‐mounted transmission chamber system, allowing IMRT in‐vivo dosimetry without pretreatment linac time |
title | A simple model for predicting the signal for a head‐mounted transmission chamber system, allowing IMRT in‐vivo dosimetry without pretreatment linac time |
title_full | A simple model for predicting the signal for a head‐mounted transmission chamber system, allowing IMRT in‐vivo dosimetry without pretreatment linac time |
title_fullStr | A simple model for predicting the signal for a head‐mounted transmission chamber system, allowing IMRT in‐vivo dosimetry without pretreatment linac time |
title_full_unstemmed | A simple model for predicting the signal for a head‐mounted transmission chamber system, allowing IMRT in‐vivo dosimetry without pretreatment linac time |
title_short | A simple model for predicting the signal for a head‐mounted transmission chamber system, allowing IMRT in‐vivo dosimetry without pretreatment linac time |
title_sort | simple model for predicting the signal for a head‐mounted transmission chamber system, allowing imrt in‐vivo dosimetry without pretreatment linac time |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25207413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i4.4842 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnsondaniel asimplemodelforpredictingthesignalforaheadmountedtransmissionchambersystemallowingimrtinvivodosimetrywithoutpretreatmentlinactime AT westonstevenj asimplemodelforpredictingthesignalforaheadmountedtransmissionchambersystemallowingimrtinvivodosimetrywithoutpretreatmentlinactime AT cosgrovevivianp asimplemodelforpredictingthesignalforaheadmountedtransmissionchambersystemallowingimrtinvivodosimetrywithoutpretreatmentlinactime AT thwaitesdavidi asimplemodelforpredictingthesignalforaheadmountedtransmissionchambersystemallowingimrtinvivodosimetrywithoutpretreatmentlinactime AT johnsondaniel simplemodelforpredictingthesignalforaheadmountedtransmissionchambersystemallowingimrtinvivodosimetrywithoutpretreatmentlinactime AT westonstevenj simplemodelforpredictingthesignalforaheadmountedtransmissionchambersystemallowingimrtinvivodosimetrywithoutpretreatmentlinactime AT cosgrovevivianp simplemodelforpredictingthesignalforaheadmountedtransmissionchambersystemallowingimrtinvivodosimetrywithoutpretreatmentlinactime AT thwaitesdavidi simplemodelforpredictingthesignalforaheadmountedtransmissionchambersystemallowingimrtinvivodosimetrywithoutpretreatmentlinactime |