Cargando…

A simpler method for total scalp irradiation: the multijaw‐size concave arc technique

The lateral electron‐photon technique (LEPT) and intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) are commonly used for total scalp irradiation. However, the treatment planning and irradiation are laborious and time‐consuming. We herein present the multijaw‐size concave arc technique (MCAT) as a total s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Inoue, Minoru, Konno, Masahiro, Ogawa, Hirofumi, Harada, Hideyuki, Asakura, Hirofumi, Fuji, Hiroshi, Murayama, Shigeyuki, Nishimura, Tetsuo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25207405
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i4.4786
_version_ 1783310359342350336
author Inoue, Minoru
Konno, Masahiro
Ogawa, Hirofumi
Harada, Hideyuki
Asakura, Hirofumi
Fuji, Hiroshi
Murayama, Shigeyuki
Nishimura, Tetsuo
author_facet Inoue, Minoru
Konno, Masahiro
Ogawa, Hirofumi
Harada, Hideyuki
Asakura, Hirofumi
Fuji, Hiroshi
Murayama, Shigeyuki
Nishimura, Tetsuo
author_sort Inoue, Minoru
collection PubMed
description The lateral electron‐photon technique (LEPT) and intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) are commonly used for total scalp irradiation. However, the treatment planning and irradiation are laborious and time‐consuming. We herein present the multijaw‐size concave arc technique (MCAT) as a total scalp irradiation method that overcomes these problems. CT datasets for eight patients previously treated for angiosarcoma of the scalp were replanned using MCAT, LEPT, and IMRT. The MCAT was designed with a dynamic conformal arc for the total scalp, with a multileaf collimator to shield the brain. Two additional conformal arcs with a decreased upper‐jaw position of the first dynamic conformal arc were used to reduce the cranial hotspots. The prescribed dose was 40 Gy (2 Gy/fraction) to 95% of the planning target volume (PTV, defined as the total scalp plus a 4 mm margin). MCAT was compared with LEPT and IMRT with respect to the PTV dose homogeneity (D5%–95%), underdosage (V < 90%), overdosage (V > 110%), doses to the brain, and the delivery time and monitor units (MUs) for single irradiation. We were able to formulate treatment plans for all three techniques that could deliver the prescription dose in all patients. MCAT was significantly superior to LEPT with respect to PTV dose homogeneity, overdosage, and underdosage, although MCAT was inferior to IMRT with respect to dose homogeneity and overdosage. The mean brain dose and high‐dosage volume of all three techniques were low, but IMRT provided larger volume to the brain than did the other two techniques in the low dosage region. In MCAT, the mean delivery time could be reduced by approximately half or more, and the mean MUs could be reduced by at least 100 compared to the other two techniques. MCAT can achieve total scalp irradiation with substantially fewer MUs and a shorter delivery time than LEPT and IMRT. PACS number: 87.55.D‐
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5875509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58755092018-04-02 A simpler method for total scalp irradiation: the multijaw‐size concave arc technique Inoue, Minoru Konno, Masahiro Ogawa, Hirofumi Harada, Hideyuki Asakura, Hirofumi Fuji, Hiroshi Murayama, Shigeyuki Nishimura, Tetsuo J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The lateral electron‐photon technique (LEPT) and intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) are commonly used for total scalp irradiation. However, the treatment planning and irradiation are laborious and time‐consuming. We herein present the multijaw‐size concave arc technique (MCAT) as a total scalp irradiation method that overcomes these problems. CT datasets for eight patients previously treated for angiosarcoma of the scalp were replanned using MCAT, LEPT, and IMRT. The MCAT was designed with a dynamic conformal arc for the total scalp, with a multileaf collimator to shield the brain. Two additional conformal arcs with a decreased upper‐jaw position of the first dynamic conformal arc were used to reduce the cranial hotspots. The prescribed dose was 40 Gy (2 Gy/fraction) to 95% of the planning target volume (PTV, defined as the total scalp plus a 4 mm margin). MCAT was compared with LEPT and IMRT with respect to the PTV dose homogeneity (D5%–95%), underdosage (V < 90%), overdosage (V > 110%), doses to the brain, and the delivery time and monitor units (MUs) for single irradiation. We were able to formulate treatment plans for all three techniques that could deliver the prescription dose in all patients. MCAT was significantly superior to LEPT with respect to PTV dose homogeneity, overdosage, and underdosage, although MCAT was inferior to IMRT with respect to dose homogeneity and overdosage. The mean brain dose and high‐dosage volume of all three techniques were low, but IMRT provided larger volume to the brain than did the other two techniques in the low dosage region. In MCAT, the mean delivery time could be reduced by approximately half or more, and the mean MUs could be reduced by at least 100 compared to the other two techniques. MCAT can achieve total scalp irradiation with substantially fewer MUs and a shorter delivery time than LEPT and IMRT. PACS number: 87.55.D‐ John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5875509/ /pubmed/25207405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i4.4786 Text en © 2014 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Inoue, Minoru
Konno, Masahiro
Ogawa, Hirofumi
Harada, Hideyuki
Asakura, Hirofumi
Fuji, Hiroshi
Murayama, Shigeyuki
Nishimura, Tetsuo
A simpler method for total scalp irradiation: the multijaw‐size concave arc technique
title A simpler method for total scalp irradiation: the multijaw‐size concave arc technique
title_full A simpler method for total scalp irradiation: the multijaw‐size concave arc technique
title_fullStr A simpler method for total scalp irradiation: the multijaw‐size concave arc technique
title_full_unstemmed A simpler method for total scalp irradiation: the multijaw‐size concave arc technique
title_short A simpler method for total scalp irradiation: the multijaw‐size concave arc technique
title_sort simpler method for total scalp irradiation: the multijaw‐size concave arc technique
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25207405
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i4.4786
work_keys_str_mv AT inoueminoru asimplermethodfortotalscalpirradiationthemultijawsizeconcavearctechnique
AT konnomasahiro asimplermethodfortotalscalpirradiationthemultijawsizeconcavearctechnique
AT ogawahirofumi asimplermethodfortotalscalpirradiationthemultijawsizeconcavearctechnique
AT haradahideyuki asimplermethodfortotalscalpirradiationthemultijawsizeconcavearctechnique
AT asakurahirofumi asimplermethodfortotalscalpirradiationthemultijawsizeconcavearctechnique
AT fujihiroshi asimplermethodfortotalscalpirradiationthemultijawsizeconcavearctechnique
AT murayamashigeyuki asimplermethodfortotalscalpirradiationthemultijawsizeconcavearctechnique
AT nishimuratetsuo asimplermethodfortotalscalpirradiationthemultijawsizeconcavearctechnique
AT inoueminoru simplermethodfortotalscalpirradiationthemultijawsizeconcavearctechnique
AT konnomasahiro simplermethodfortotalscalpirradiationthemultijawsizeconcavearctechnique
AT ogawahirofumi simplermethodfortotalscalpirradiationthemultijawsizeconcavearctechnique
AT haradahideyuki simplermethodfortotalscalpirradiationthemultijawsizeconcavearctechnique
AT asakurahirofumi simplermethodfortotalscalpirradiationthemultijawsizeconcavearctechnique
AT fujihiroshi simplermethodfortotalscalpirradiationthemultijawsizeconcavearctechnique
AT murayamashigeyuki simplermethodfortotalscalpirradiationthemultijawsizeconcavearctechnique
AT nishimuratetsuo simplermethodfortotalscalpirradiationthemultijawsizeconcavearctechnique