Cargando…

Impact of the observers' experience on daily prostate localization accuracy in ultrasound‐based IGRT with the Clarity platform

The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of daily prostate localization with ultrasound imaging of various radiation oncologists with nonhomogeneous expertise. For ten patients who underwent radical radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer, 11 radiation oncologists reviewed daily ultrasou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fiandra, Christian, Guarneri, Alessia, Muñoz, Fernando, Moretto, Francesco, Filippi, Andrea Riccardo, Levis, Mario, Ragona, Riccardo, Ricardi, Umberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25207407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i4.4795
_version_ 1783310362133659648
author Fiandra, Christian
Guarneri, Alessia
Muñoz, Fernando
Moretto, Francesco
Filippi, Andrea Riccardo
Levis, Mario
Ragona, Riccardo
Ricardi, Umberto
author_facet Fiandra, Christian
Guarneri, Alessia
Muñoz, Fernando
Moretto, Francesco
Filippi, Andrea Riccardo
Levis, Mario
Ragona, Riccardo
Ricardi, Umberto
author_sort Fiandra, Christian
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of daily prostate localization with ultrasound imaging of various radiation oncologists with nonhomogeneous expertise. For ten patients who underwent radical radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer, 11 radiation oncologists reviewed daily ultrasound scans acquired during three different treatment sessions. The average values of two senior radiation oncologists, considered to be expert observers, were selected as reference. The remaining nine observers were divided into two groups, Group 1 and Group 2, with more and less than one year of experience, respectively. The recorded shifts in prostate position were divided in three classes: <3 mm, 3–5 mm, and > 5 mm. Deviations from reference were less than 3 mm in all directions in 91% and 81% of measurements in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. The maximum difference in terms of root mean square error (RMSE) was reported for superior‐inferior (SI) direction, in particular a mean difference of 3.24 mm was observed for Group 2 in respect to the reference; moreover RMSE was 1 and 1.3 mm higher for Group 2 for anterior‐posterior (AP) and left‐right (LR) directions, respectively. The difference between Groups 1 and 2 was significant (p < 0.01) for all directions. The mean values for the shifts in all three directions between Group 1 and the references were 0.235 mm, 0.385 mm, and 0.009 mm for the LR, SI, and AP directions, respectively. The position of the prostate gland is more easily detectable ([Formula: see text]) in the AP direction, while the visibility is lower for LR ([Formula: see text]) and SI boundaries (p < 0.05). The observers' experience is essential for positioning the target correctly; therefore, a training period is recommended before putting the system into clinical practice. PACS number: 87.63.dh
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5875522
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58755222018-04-02 Impact of the observers' experience on daily prostate localization accuracy in ultrasound‐based IGRT with the Clarity platform Fiandra, Christian Guarneri, Alessia Muñoz, Fernando Moretto, Francesco Filippi, Andrea Riccardo Levis, Mario Ragona, Riccardo Ricardi, Umberto J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of daily prostate localization with ultrasound imaging of various radiation oncologists with nonhomogeneous expertise. For ten patients who underwent radical radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer, 11 radiation oncologists reviewed daily ultrasound scans acquired during three different treatment sessions. The average values of two senior radiation oncologists, considered to be expert observers, were selected as reference. The remaining nine observers were divided into two groups, Group 1 and Group 2, with more and less than one year of experience, respectively. The recorded shifts in prostate position were divided in three classes: <3 mm, 3–5 mm, and > 5 mm. Deviations from reference were less than 3 mm in all directions in 91% and 81% of measurements in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. The maximum difference in terms of root mean square error (RMSE) was reported for superior‐inferior (SI) direction, in particular a mean difference of 3.24 mm was observed for Group 2 in respect to the reference; moreover RMSE was 1 and 1.3 mm higher for Group 2 for anterior‐posterior (AP) and left‐right (LR) directions, respectively. The difference between Groups 1 and 2 was significant (p < 0.01) for all directions. The mean values for the shifts in all three directions between Group 1 and the references were 0.235 mm, 0.385 mm, and 0.009 mm for the LR, SI, and AP directions, respectively. The position of the prostate gland is more easily detectable ([Formula: see text]) in the AP direction, while the visibility is lower for LR ([Formula: see text]) and SI boundaries (p < 0.05). The observers' experience is essential for positioning the target correctly; therefore, a training period is recommended before putting the system into clinical practice. PACS number: 87.63.dh John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5875522/ /pubmed/25207407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i4.4795 Text en © 2014 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Fiandra, Christian
Guarneri, Alessia
Muñoz, Fernando
Moretto, Francesco
Filippi, Andrea Riccardo
Levis, Mario
Ragona, Riccardo
Ricardi, Umberto
Impact of the observers' experience on daily prostate localization accuracy in ultrasound‐based IGRT with the Clarity platform
title Impact of the observers' experience on daily prostate localization accuracy in ultrasound‐based IGRT with the Clarity platform
title_full Impact of the observers' experience on daily prostate localization accuracy in ultrasound‐based IGRT with the Clarity platform
title_fullStr Impact of the observers' experience on daily prostate localization accuracy in ultrasound‐based IGRT with the Clarity platform
title_full_unstemmed Impact of the observers' experience on daily prostate localization accuracy in ultrasound‐based IGRT with the Clarity platform
title_short Impact of the observers' experience on daily prostate localization accuracy in ultrasound‐based IGRT with the Clarity platform
title_sort impact of the observers' experience on daily prostate localization accuracy in ultrasound‐based igrt with the clarity platform
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25207407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i4.4795
work_keys_str_mv AT fiandrachristian impactoftheobserversexperienceondailyprostatelocalizationaccuracyinultrasoundbasedigrtwiththeclarityplatform
AT guarnerialessia impactoftheobserversexperienceondailyprostatelocalizationaccuracyinultrasoundbasedigrtwiththeclarityplatform
AT munozfernando impactoftheobserversexperienceondailyprostatelocalizationaccuracyinultrasoundbasedigrtwiththeclarityplatform
AT morettofrancesco impactoftheobserversexperienceondailyprostatelocalizationaccuracyinultrasoundbasedigrtwiththeclarityplatform
AT filippiandreariccardo impactoftheobserversexperienceondailyprostatelocalizationaccuracyinultrasoundbasedigrtwiththeclarityplatform
AT levismario impactoftheobserversexperienceondailyprostatelocalizationaccuracyinultrasoundbasedigrtwiththeclarityplatform
AT ragonariccardo impactoftheobserversexperienceondailyprostatelocalizationaccuracyinultrasoundbasedigrtwiththeclarityplatform
AT ricardiumberto impactoftheobserversexperienceondailyprostatelocalizationaccuracyinultrasoundbasedigrtwiththeclarityplatform