Cargando…

Validation of nonrigid registration in pretreatment and follow‐up PET/CT scans for quantification of tumor residue in lung cancer patients

Nonrigid registrations of pre‐ and postradiotherapy (RT) PET/CT scans of NSCLC patients were performed with different algorithms and validated tracking internal landmarks. Dice overlap ratios (DR) of high FDG‐uptake areas in registered PET/CT scans were then calculated to study patterns of relapse....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spijkerman, Jolanda, Fontanarosa, Davide, Das, Marco, van Elmpt, Wouter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25207414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i4.4847
_version_ 1783310362365394944
author Spijkerman, Jolanda
Fontanarosa, Davide
Das, Marco
van Elmpt, Wouter
author_facet Spijkerman, Jolanda
Fontanarosa, Davide
Das, Marco
van Elmpt, Wouter
author_sort Spijkerman, Jolanda
collection PubMed
description Nonrigid registrations of pre‐ and postradiotherapy (RT) PET/CT scans of NSCLC patients were performed with different algorithms and validated tracking internal landmarks. Dice overlap ratios (DR) of high FDG‐uptake areas in registered PET/CT scans were then calculated to study patterns of relapse. For 22 patients, pre‐ and post‐RT PET/CT scans were registered first rigidly and then nonrigidly. For three patients, two types (based on Demons or Morphons) of nonrigid registration algorithms each with four different parameter settings were applied and assessed using landmark validation. The two best performing methods were tested on all patients, who were then classified into three groups: large (Group 1), minor (Group 2) or insufficient improvement (Group 3) of registration accuracy. For Group 1 and 2, DRs between high FDG‐uptake areas in pre‐ and post‐RT PET scans were determined. Distances between corresponding landmarks on deformed pre‐RT and post‐RT scans decreased for all registration methods. Differences between Demons and Morphons methods were smaller than 1 mm. For Group 1, landmark distance decreased from 9.5 ± 2.1 mm to 3.8 ± 1.2 mm (mean ± 1 SD, p < 0.001), and for Group 3 from 13.6 ± 3.2 mm to 8.0 ± 2.2 mm ([Formula: see text]). No significant change was observed for Group 2 where distances decreased from 5.6 ± 1.3 mm to 4.5 ± 1.1 mm ([Formula: see text]). DRs of high FDG‐uptake areas improved significantly after nonrigid registration for most patients in Group 1. Landmark validation of nonrigid registration methods for follow‐up CT imaging in NSCLC is necessary. Nonrigid registration significantly improves matching between pre‐ and post‐RT CT scans for a subset of patients, although not in all patients. Hence, the quality of the registration needs to be assessed for each patient individually. Successful nonrigid registration increased the overlap between pre‐ and post‐RT high FDG‐uptake regions. PACS number: 87.57.Q‐, 87.57.C‐, 87.57.N‐, 87.57.‐s, 87.55.‐x, 87.55.D‐, 87.55.dh, 87.57.uk, 87.57.nj
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5875523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58755232018-04-02 Validation of nonrigid registration in pretreatment and follow‐up PET/CT scans for quantification of tumor residue in lung cancer patients Spijkerman, Jolanda Fontanarosa, Davide Das, Marco van Elmpt, Wouter J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Nonrigid registrations of pre‐ and postradiotherapy (RT) PET/CT scans of NSCLC patients were performed with different algorithms and validated tracking internal landmarks. Dice overlap ratios (DR) of high FDG‐uptake areas in registered PET/CT scans were then calculated to study patterns of relapse. For 22 patients, pre‐ and post‐RT PET/CT scans were registered first rigidly and then nonrigidly. For three patients, two types (based on Demons or Morphons) of nonrigid registration algorithms each with four different parameter settings were applied and assessed using landmark validation. The two best performing methods were tested on all patients, who were then classified into three groups: large (Group 1), minor (Group 2) or insufficient improvement (Group 3) of registration accuracy. For Group 1 and 2, DRs between high FDG‐uptake areas in pre‐ and post‐RT PET scans were determined. Distances between corresponding landmarks on deformed pre‐RT and post‐RT scans decreased for all registration methods. Differences between Demons and Morphons methods were smaller than 1 mm. For Group 1, landmark distance decreased from 9.5 ± 2.1 mm to 3.8 ± 1.2 mm (mean ± 1 SD, p < 0.001), and for Group 3 from 13.6 ± 3.2 mm to 8.0 ± 2.2 mm ([Formula: see text]). No significant change was observed for Group 2 where distances decreased from 5.6 ± 1.3 mm to 4.5 ± 1.1 mm ([Formula: see text]). DRs of high FDG‐uptake areas improved significantly after nonrigid registration for most patients in Group 1. Landmark validation of nonrigid registration methods for follow‐up CT imaging in NSCLC is necessary. Nonrigid registration significantly improves matching between pre‐ and post‐RT CT scans for a subset of patients, although not in all patients. Hence, the quality of the registration needs to be assessed for each patient individually. Successful nonrigid registration increased the overlap between pre‐ and post‐RT high FDG‐uptake regions. PACS number: 87.57.Q‐, 87.57.C‐, 87.57.N‐, 87.57.‐s, 87.55.‐x, 87.55.D‐, 87.55.dh, 87.57.uk, 87.57.nj John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5875523/ /pubmed/25207414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i4.4847 Text en © 2014 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Spijkerman, Jolanda
Fontanarosa, Davide
Das, Marco
van Elmpt, Wouter
Validation of nonrigid registration in pretreatment and follow‐up PET/CT scans for quantification of tumor residue in lung cancer patients
title Validation of nonrigid registration in pretreatment and follow‐up PET/CT scans for quantification of tumor residue in lung cancer patients
title_full Validation of nonrigid registration in pretreatment and follow‐up PET/CT scans for quantification of tumor residue in lung cancer patients
title_fullStr Validation of nonrigid registration in pretreatment and follow‐up PET/CT scans for quantification of tumor residue in lung cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed Validation of nonrigid registration in pretreatment and follow‐up PET/CT scans for quantification of tumor residue in lung cancer patients
title_short Validation of nonrigid registration in pretreatment and follow‐up PET/CT scans for quantification of tumor residue in lung cancer patients
title_sort validation of nonrigid registration in pretreatment and follow‐up pet/ct scans for quantification of tumor residue in lung cancer patients
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25207414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i4.4847
work_keys_str_mv AT spijkermanjolanda validationofnonrigidregistrationinpretreatmentandfollowuppetctscansforquantificationoftumorresidueinlungcancerpatients
AT fontanarosadavide validationofnonrigidregistrationinpretreatmentandfollowuppetctscansforquantificationoftumorresidueinlungcancerpatients
AT dasmarco validationofnonrigidregistrationinpretreatmentandfollowuppetctscansforquantificationoftumorresidueinlungcancerpatients
AT vanelmptwouter validationofnonrigidregistrationinpretreatmentandfollowuppetctscansforquantificationoftumorresidueinlungcancerpatients