Cargando…

ACR testing of a dedicated head SPECT unit

Physics testing necessary for program accreditation is rigorously defined by the ACR. This testing is easily applied to most conventional SPECT systems based on gamma camera technology. The inSPira HD is a dedicated head SPECT system based on a rotating dual clamshell design that acquires data in a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sensakovic, William F., Hough, Matthew C., Kimbley, Elizabeth A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25207395
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i4.4632
_version_ 1783310363302821888
author Sensakovic, William F.
Hough, Matthew C.
Kimbley, Elizabeth A.
author_facet Sensakovic, William F.
Hough, Matthew C.
Kimbley, Elizabeth A.
author_sort Sensakovic, William F.
collection PubMed
description Physics testing necessary for program accreditation is rigorously defined by the ACR. This testing is easily applied to most conventional SPECT systems based on gamma camera technology. The inSPira HD is a dedicated head SPECT system based on a rotating dual clamshell design that acquires data in a dual‐spiral geometry. The unique geometry and configuration force alterations of the standard ACR physics testing protocol. Various tests, such as intrinsic planar uniformity and/or resolution, do not apply. The Data Spectrum Deluxe Phantom used for conventional SPECT testing cannot fit in the inSPira HD scanner bore, making (currently) unapproved use of the Small Deluxe SPECT Phantom necessary. Matrix size, collimator type, scanning time, reconstruction method, and attenuation correction were all varied from the typically prescribed ACR instructions. Visible spheres, sphere contrast, visible rod groups, uniformity, and root mean square (RMS) noise were measured. The acquired SPECT images surpassed the minimum ACR requirements for both spatial resolution (9.5 mm spheres resolved) and contrast (6.4 mm rod groups resolved). Sphere contrast was generally high. Integral uniformity was 4% and RMS noise was 1.7%. Noise appeared more correlated than in images from a conventional SPECT scanner. Attenuation‐corrected images produced from direct CT scanning of the phantom and a manufacturer supplied model of the phantom demonstrated negligible differences. PACS numbers: 87.57.C‐, 87.57.uh, 87.63.lj
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5875529
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58755292018-04-02 ACR testing of a dedicated head SPECT unit Sensakovic, William F. Hough, Matthew C. Kimbley, Elizabeth A. J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes Physics testing necessary for program accreditation is rigorously defined by the ACR. This testing is easily applied to most conventional SPECT systems based on gamma camera technology. The inSPira HD is a dedicated head SPECT system based on a rotating dual clamshell design that acquires data in a dual‐spiral geometry. The unique geometry and configuration force alterations of the standard ACR physics testing protocol. Various tests, such as intrinsic planar uniformity and/or resolution, do not apply. The Data Spectrum Deluxe Phantom used for conventional SPECT testing cannot fit in the inSPira HD scanner bore, making (currently) unapproved use of the Small Deluxe SPECT Phantom necessary. Matrix size, collimator type, scanning time, reconstruction method, and attenuation correction were all varied from the typically prescribed ACR instructions. Visible spheres, sphere contrast, visible rod groups, uniformity, and root mean square (RMS) noise were measured. The acquired SPECT images surpassed the minimum ACR requirements for both spatial resolution (9.5 mm spheres resolved) and contrast (6.4 mm rod groups resolved). Sphere contrast was generally high. Integral uniformity was 4% and RMS noise was 1.7%. Noise appeared more correlated than in images from a conventional SPECT scanner. Attenuation‐corrected images produced from direct CT scanning of the phantom and a manufacturer supplied model of the phantom demonstrated negligible differences. PACS numbers: 87.57.C‐, 87.57.uh, 87.63.lj John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5875529/ /pubmed/25207395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i4.4632 Text en © 2014 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Notes
Sensakovic, William F.
Hough, Matthew C.
Kimbley, Elizabeth A.
ACR testing of a dedicated head SPECT unit
title ACR testing of a dedicated head SPECT unit
title_full ACR testing of a dedicated head SPECT unit
title_fullStr ACR testing of a dedicated head SPECT unit
title_full_unstemmed ACR testing of a dedicated head SPECT unit
title_short ACR testing of a dedicated head SPECT unit
title_sort acr testing of a dedicated head spect unit
topic Technical Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25207395
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i4.4632
work_keys_str_mv AT sensakovicwilliamf acrtestingofadedicatedheadspectunit
AT houghmatthewc acrtestingofadedicatedheadspectunit
AT kimbleyelizabetha acrtestingofadedicatedheadspectunit