Cargando…
In vivo dosimetry for total body irradiation: five‐year results and technique comparison
The aim of this work is to establish if the new CT‐based total body irradiation (TBI) planning techniques used at University College London Hospital (UCLH) and Royal Free Hospital (RFH) are comparable to the previous technique at the Middlesex Hospital (MXH) by analyzing predicted and measured diode...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25207423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i4.4939 |
_version_ | 1783310363528265728 |
---|---|
author | Patel, Reshma P. Warry, Alison J. Eaton, David J. Collis, Christopher H. Rosenberg, Ivan |
author_facet | Patel, Reshma P. Warry, Alison J. Eaton, David J. Collis, Christopher H. Rosenberg, Ivan |
author_sort | Patel, Reshma P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this work is to establish if the new CT‐based total body irradiation (TBI) planning techniques used at University College London Hospital (UCLH) and Royal Free Hospital (RFH) are comparable to the previous technique at the Middlesex Hospital (MXH) by analyzing predicted and measured diode results. TBI aims to deliver a homogeneous dose to the entire body, typically using extended SSD fields with beam modulation to limit doses to organs at risk. In vivo dosimetry is used to verify the accuracy of delivered doses. In 2005, when the Middlesex Hospital was decommissioned and merged with UCLH, both UCLH and the RFH introduced updated CT‐planned TBI techniques, based on the old MXH technique. More CT slices and in vivo measurement points were used by both; UCLH introduced a beam modulation technique using MLC segments, while RFH updated to a combination of lead compensators and bolus. Semiconductor diodes were used to measure entrance and exit doses in several anatomical locations along the entire body. Diode results from both centers for over five years of treatments were analyzed and compared to the previous MXH technique for accuracy and precision of delivered doses. The most stable location was the field center with standard deviations of 4.1% (MXH), 3.7% (UCLH), and 1.7% (RFH). The least stable position was the ankles. Mean variation with fraction number was within 1.5% for all three techniques. In vivo dosimetry can be used to verify complex modulated CT‐planned TBI, and demonstrate improvements and limitations in techniques. The results show that the new UCLH technique is no worse than the previous MXH one and comparable to the current RFH technique. PACS numbers: 87.55.Qr, 87.56.N‐ |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5875530 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58755302018-04-02 In vivo dosimetry for total body irradiation: five‐year results and technique comparison Patel, Reshma P. Warry, Alison J. Eaton, David J. Collis, Christopher H. Rosenberg, Ivan J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The aim of this work is to establish if the new CT‐based total body irradiation (TBI) planning techniques used at University College London Hospital (UCLH) and Royal Free Hospital (RFH) are comparable to the previous technique at the Middlesex Hospital (MXH) by analyzing predicted and measured diode results. TBI aims to deliver a homogeneous dose to the entire body, typically using extended SSD fields with beam modulation to limit doses to organs at risk. In vivo dosimetry is used to verify the accuracy of delivered doses. In 2005, when the Middlesex Hospital was decommissioned and merged with UCLH, both UCLH and the RFH introduced updated CT‐planned TBI techniques, based on the old MXH technique. More CT slices and in vivo measurement points were used by both; UCLH introduced a beam modulation technique using MLC segments, while RFH updated to a combination of lead compensators and bolus. Semiconductor diodes were used to measure entrance and exit doses in several anatomical locations along the entire body. Diode results from both centers for over five years of treatments were analyzed and compared to the previous MXH technique for accuracy and precision of delivered doses. The most stable location was the field center with standard deviations of 4.1% (MXH), 3.7% (UCLH), and 1.7% (RFH). The least stable position was the ankles. Mean variation with fraction number was within 1.5% for all three techniques. In vivo dosimetry can be used to verify complex modulated CT‐planned TBI, and demonstrate improvements and limitations in techniques. The results show that the new UCLH technique is no worse than the previous MXH one and comparable to the current RFH technique. PACS numbers: 87.55.Qr, 87.56.N‐ John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5875530/ /pubmed/25207423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i4.4939 Text en © 2014 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Patel, Reshma P. Warry, Alison J. Eaton, David J. Collis, Christopher H. Rosenberg, Ivan In vivo dosimetry for total body irradiation: five‐year results and technique comparison |
title |
In vivo dosimetry for total body irradiation: five‐year results and technique comparison |
title_full |
In vivo dosimetry for total body irradiation: five‐year results and technique comparison |
title_fullStr |
In vivo dosimetry for total body irradiation: five‐year results and technique comparison |
title_full_unstemmed |
In vivo dosimetry for total body irradiation: five‐year results and technique comparison |
title_short |
In vivo dosimetry for total body irradiation: five‐year results and technique comparison |
title_sort | in vivo dosimetry for total body irradiation: five‐year results and technique comparison |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25207423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i4.4939 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patelreshmap invivodosimetryfortotalbodyirradiationfiveyearresultsandtechniquecomparison AT warryalisonj invivodosimetryfortotalbodyirradiationfiveyearresultsandtechniquecomparison AT eatondavidj invivodosimetryfortotalbodyirradiationfiveyearresultsandtechniquecomparison AT collischristopherh invivodosimetryfortotalbodyirradiationfiveyearresultsandtechniquecomparison AT rosenbergivan invivodosimetryfortotalbodyirradiationfiveyearresultsandtechniquecomparison |