Cargando…

In vivo dosimetry for total body irradiation: five‐year results and technique comparison

The aim of this work is to establish if the new CT‐based total body irradiation (TBI) planning techniques used at University College London Hospital (UCLH) and Royal Free Hospital (RFH) are comparable to the previous technique at the Middlesex Hospital (MXH) by analyzing predicted and measured diode...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Reshma P., Warry, Alison J., Eaton, David J., Collis, Christopher H., Rosenberg, Ivan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25207423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i4.4939
_version_ 1783310363528265728
author Patel, Reshma P.
Warry, Alison J.
Eaton, David J.
Collis, Christopher H.
Rosenberg, Ivan
author_facet Patel, Reshma P.
Warry, Alison J.
Eaton, David J.
Collis, Christopher H.
Rosenberg, Ivan
author_sort Patel, Reshma P.
collection PubMed
description The aim of this work is to establish if the new CT‐based total body irradiation (TBI) planning techniques used at University College London Hospital (UCLH) and Royal Free Hospital (RFH) are comparable to the previous technique at the Middlesex Hospital (MXH) by analyzing predicted and measured diode results. TBI aims to deliver a homogeneous dose to the entire body, typically using extended SSD fields with beam modulation to limit doses to organs at risk. In vivo dosimetry is used to verify the accuracy of delivered doses. In 2005, when the Middlesex Hospital was decommissioned and merged with UCLH, both UCLH and the RFH introduced updated CT‐planned TBI techniques, based on the old MXH technique. More CT slices and in vivo measurement points were used by both; UCLH introduced a beam modulation technique using MLC segments, while RFH updated to a combination of lead compensators and bolus. Semiconductor diodes were used to measure entrance and exit doses in several anatomical locations along the entire body. Diode results from both centers for over five years of treatments were analyzed and compared to the previous MXH technique for accuracy and precision of delivered doses. The most stable location was the field center with standard deviations of 4.1% (MXH), 3.7% (UCLH), and 1.7% (RFH). The least stable position was the ankles. Mean variation with fraction number was within 1.5% for all three techniques. In vivo dosimetry can be used to verify complex modulated CT‐planned TBI, and demonstrate improvements and limitations in techniques. The results show that the new UCLH technique is no worse than the previous MXH one and comparable to the current RFH technique. PACS numbers: 87.55.Qr, 87.56.N‐
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5875530
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58755302018-04-02 In vivo dosimetry for total body irradiation: five‐year results and technique comparison Patel, Reshma P. Warry, Alison J. Eaton, David J. Collis, Christopher H. Rosenberg, Ivan J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The aim of this work is to establish if the new CT‐based total body irradiation (TBI) planning techniques used at University College London Hospital (UCLH) and Royal Free Hospital (RFH) are comparable to the previous technique at the Middlesex Hospital (MXH) by analyzing predicted and measured diode results. TBI aims to deliver a homogeneous dose to the entire body, typically using extended SSD fields with beam modulation to limit doses to organs at risk. In vivo dosimetry is used to verify the accuracy of delivered doses. In 2005, when the Middlesex Hospital was decommissioned and merged with UCLH, both UCLH and the RFH introduced updated CT‐planned TBI techniques, based on the old MXH technique. More CT slices and in vivo measurement points were used by both; UCLH introduced a beam modulation technique using MLC segments, while RFH updated to a combination of lead compensators and bolus. Semiconductor diodes were used to measure entrance and exit doses in several anatomical locations along the entire body. Diode results from both centers for over five years of treatments were analyzed and compared to the previous MXH technique for accuracy and precision of delivered doses. The most stable location was the field center with standard deviations of 4.1% (MXH), 3.7% (UCLH), and 1.7% (RFH). The least stable position was the ankles. Mean variation with fraction number was within 1.5% for all three techniques. In vivo dosimetry can be used to verify complex modulated CT‐planned TBI, and demonstrate improvements and limitations in techniques. The results show that the new UCLH technique is no worse than the previous MXH one and comparable to the current RFH technique. PACS numbers: 87.55.Qr, 87.56.N‐ John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5875530/ /pubmed/25207423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i4.4939 Text en © 2014 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Patel, Reshma P.
Warry, Alison J.
Eaton, David J.
Collis, Christopher H.
Rosenberg, Ivan
In vivo dosimetry for total body irradiation: five‐year results and technique comparison
title In vivo dosimetry for total body irradiation: five‐year results and technique comparison
title_full In vivo dosimetry for total body irradiation: five‐year results and technique comparison
title_fullStr In vivo dosimetry for total body irradiation: five‐year results and technique comparison
title_full_unstemmed In vivo dosimetry for total body irradiation: five‐year results and technique comparison
title_short In vivo dosimetry for total body irradiation: five‐year results and technique comparison
title_sort in vivo dosimetry for total body irradiation: five‐year results and technique comparison
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25207423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i4.4939
work_keys_str_mv AT patelreshmap invivodosimetryfortotalbodyirradiationfiveyearresultsandtechniquecomparison
AT warryalisonj invivodosimetryfortotalbodyirradiationfiveyearresultsandtechniquecomparison
AT eatondavidj invivodosimetryfortotalbodyirradiationfiveyearresultsandtechniquecomparison
AT collischristopherh invivodosimetryfortotalbodyirradiationfiveyearresultsandtechniquecomparison
AT rosenbergivan invivodosimetryfortotalbodyirradiationfiveyearresultsandtechniquecomparison