Cargando…
Going the distance: validation of Acuros and AAA at an extended SSD of 400 cm
Accurate dose calculation and treatment delivery is essential for total body irradiation (TBI). In an effort to verify the accuracy of TBI dose calculation at our institution, we evaluated both the Varian Eclipse AAA and Acuros algorithms to predict dose distributions at an extended source‐to‐surfac...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27074473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i2.5913 |
_version_ | 1783310367806455808 |
---|---|
author | Lamichhane, Narottam Patel, Vivek N. Studenski, Matthew T. |
author_facet | Lamichhane, Narottam Patel, Vivek N. Studenski, Matthew T. |
author_sort | Lamichhane, Narottam |
collection | PubMed |
description | Accurate dose calculation and treatment delivery is essential for total body irradiation (TBI). In an effort to verify the accuracy of TBI dose calculation at our institution, we evaluated both the Varian Eclipse AAA and Acuros algorithms to predict dose distributions at an extended source‐to‐surface distance (SSD) of 400 cm. Measurements were compared to calculated values for a 6 MV beam in physical and virtual phantoms at 400 cm SSD using open beams for both [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] field sizes. Inline and crossline profiles were acquired at equivalent depths of 5 cm, 10 cm, and 20 cm. Depth‐dose curves were acquired using EBT2 film and an ion chamber for both field sizes. Finally, a RANDO phantom was used to simulate an actual TBI treatment. At this extended SSD, care must be taken using the planning system as there is good relative agreement between measured and calculated profiles for both algorithms, but there are deviations in terms of the absolute dose. Acuros has better agreement than AAA in the penumbra region. PACS number(s): 87.55.kd |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5875551 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58755512018-04-02 Going the distance: validation of Acuros and AAA at an extended SSD of 400 cm Lamichhane, Narottam Patel, Vivek N. Studenski, Matthew T. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Accurate dose calculation and treatment delivery is essential for total body irradiation (TBI). In an effort to verify the accuracy of TBI dose calculation at our institution, we evaluated both the Varian Eclipse AAA and Acuros algorithms to predict dose distributions at an extended source‐to‐surface distance (SSD) of 400 cm. Measurements were compared to calculated values for a 6 MV beam in physical and virtual phantoms at 400 cm SSD using open beams for both [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] field sizes. Inline and crossline profiles were acquired at equivalent depths of 5 cm, 10 cm, and 20 cm. Depth‐dose curves were acquired using EBT2 film and an ion chamber for both field sizes. Finally, a RANDO phantom was used to simulate an actual TBI treatment. At this extended SSD, care must be taken using the planning system as there is good relative agreement between measured and calculated profiles for both algorithms, but there are deviations in terms of the absolute dose. Acuros has better agreement than AAA in the penumbra region. PACS number(s): 87.55.kd John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5875551/ /pubmed/27074473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i2.5913 Text en © 2016 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Lamichhane, Narottam Patel, Vivek N. Studenski, Matthew T. Going the distance: validation of Acuros and AAA at an extended SSD of 400 cm |
title | Going the distance: validation of Acuros and AAA at an extended SSD of 400 cm |
title_full | Going the distance: validation of Acuros and AAA at an extended SSD of 400 cm |
title_fullStr | Going the distance: validation of Acuros and AAA at an extended SSD of 400 cm |
title_full_unstemmed | Going the distance: validation of Acuros and AAA at an extended SSD of 400 cm |
title_short | Going the distance: validation of Acuros and AAA at an extended SSD of 400 cm |
title_sort | going the distance: validation of acuros and aaa at an extended ssd of 400 cm |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27074473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i2.5913 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lamichhanenarottam goingthedistancevalidationofacurosandaaaatanextendedssdof400cm AT patelvivekn goingthedistancevalidationofacurosandaaaatanextendedssdof400cm AT studenskimatthewt goingthedistancevalidationofacurosandaaaatanextendedssdof400cm |