Cargando…

Inter‐ and intrafractional dose uncertainty in hypofractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery

The purpose of this study is to evaluate inter‐ and intrafractional dose variations resulting from head position deviations for patients treated with the Extend relocatable frame system utilized in hypofractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS). While previous reports characterized the residual se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Taeho, Sheehan, Jason, Schlesinger, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27074468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i2.5851
_version_ 1783310371287728128
author Kim, Taeho
Sheehan, Jason
Schlesinger, David
author_facet Kim, Taeho
Sheehan, Jason
Schlesinger, David
author_sort Kim, Taeho
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study is to evaluate inter‐ and intrafractional dose variations resulting from head position deviations for patients treated with the Extend relocatable frame system utilized in hypofractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS). While previous reports characterized the residual setup and intrafraction uncertainties of the system, the dosimetric consequences have not been investigated. A digital gauge was used to measure the head position of 16 consecutive Extend patients (62 fractions) at the time of simulation, before each fraction, and immediately following each fraction. Vector interfraction (difference between simulation and prefraction positions) and intrafraction (difference between postfraction and prefraction positions) shifts in patient position were calculated. Planned dose distributions were shifted by the offset to determine the time‐of‐treatment dose. Variations in mean and maximum target and organ at risk (OAR) doses as a function of positional shift were evaluated. The mean vector interfraction shift was 0.64 mm (Standard Deviation (SD): 0.25 mm, maximum: 1.17 mm). The mean intrafraction shift was 0.39 mm (SD: 0.25 mm, maximum: 1.44 mm). The mean variation in mean target dose was 0.66% (SD: 1.15%, maximum: 5.77%) for interfraction shifts and 0.26% (SD: 0.34%, maximum: 1.85%) for intrafraction shifts. The mean variation in maximum dose to OARs was 7.15% (SD: 5.73%, maximum: 30.59%) for interfraction shifts and 4.07% (SD: 4.22%, maximum: 17.04%) for intrafraction shifts. Linear fitting of the mean variation in maximum dose to OARs as a function of position yielded dose deviations of 10.58%/mm for interfractional shifts and 7.69%/mm for intrafractional shifts. Positional uncertainties when performing hypofractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery with the Extend system are small and comparable to frame‐based uncertainties ([Formula: see text]). However, the steep dose gradient characteristics of GKRS mean that the dosimetric consequences of positional uncertainties should be considered as part of treatment planning. These dose uncertainties should be evaluated in the context of tumor response and OAR tolerance for hypofractionated treatment scenarios where any increase in dose may be tempered by the increased protection hypofractionation provides to normal tissue. PACS number(s): 87.52.‐g
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5875566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58755662018-04-02 Inter‐ and intrafractional dose uncertainty in hypofractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery Kim, Taeho Sheehan, Jason Schlesinger, David J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The purpose of this study is to evaluate inter‐ and intrafractional dose variations resulting from head position deviations for patients treated with the Extend relocatable frame system utilized in hypofractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS). While previous reports characterized the residual setup and intrafraction uncertainties of the system, the dosimetric consequences have not been investigated. A digital gauge was used to measure the head position of 16 consecutive Extend patients (62 fractions) at the time of simulation, before each fraction, and immediately following each fraction. Vector interfraction (difference between simulation and prefraction positions) and intrafraction (difference between postfraction and prefraction positions) shifts in patient position were calculated. Planned dose distributions were shifted by the offset to determine the time‐of‐treatment dose. Variations in mean and maximum target and organ at risk (OAR) doses as a function of positional shift were evaluated. The mean vector interfraction shift was 0.64 mm (Standard Deviation (SD): 0.25 mm, maximum: 1.17 mm). The mean intrafraction shift was 0.39 mm (SD: 0.25 mm, maximum: 1.44 mm). The mean variation in mean target dose was 0.66% (SD: 1.15%, maximum: 5.77%) for interfraction shifts and 0.26% (SD: 0.34%, maximum: 1.85%) for intrafraction shifts. The mean variation in maximum dose to OARs was 7.15% (SD: 5.73%, maximum: 30.59%) for interfraction shifts and 4.07% (SD: 4.22%, maximum: 17.04%) for intrafraction shifts. Linear fitting of the mean variation in maximum dose to OARs as a function of position yielded dose deviations of 10.58%/mm for interfractional shifts and 7.69%/mm for intrafractional shifts. Positional uncertainties when performing hypofractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery with the Extend system are small and comparable to frame‐based uncertainties ([Formula: see text]). However, the steep dose gradient characteristics of GKRS mean that the dosimetric consequences of positional uncertainties should be considered as part of treatment planning. These dose uncertainties should be evaluated in the context of tumor response and OAR tolerance for hypofractionated treatment scenarios where any increase in dose may be tempered by the increased protection hypofractionation provides to normal tissue. PACS number(s): 87.52.‐g John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5875566/ /pubmed/27074468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i2.5851 Text en © 2016 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Kim, Taeho
Sheehan, Jason
Schlesinger, David
Inter‐ and intrafractional dose uncertainty in hypofractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery
title Inter‐ and intrafractional dose uncertainty in hypofractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery
title_full Inter‐ and intrafractional dose uncertainty in hypofractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery
title_fullStr Inter‐ and intrafractional dose uncertainty in hypofractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery
title_full_unstemmed Inter‐ and intrafractional dose uncertainty in hypofractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery
title_short Inter‐ and intrafractional dose uncertainty in hypofractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery
title_sort inter‐ and intrafractional dose uncertainty in hypofractionated gamma knife radiosurgery
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27074468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i2.5851
work_keys_str_mv AT kimtaeho interandintrafractionaldoseuncertaintyinhypofractionatedgammakniferadiosurgery
AT sheehanjason interandintrafractionaldoseuncertaintyinhypofractionatedgammakniferadiosurgery
AT schlesingerdavid interandintrafractionaldoseuncertaintyinhypofractionatedgammakniferadiosurgery