Cargando…

Electron beam energy QA — a note on measurement tolerances

Monthly QA is recommended to verify the constancy of high‐energy electron beams generated for clinical use by linear accelerators. The tolerances are defined as [Formula: see text] in beam penetration according to AAPM task group report 142. The practical implementation is typically achieved by meas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meyer, Juergen, Nyflot, Matthew J., Smith, Wade P., Wootton, Landon S., Young, Lori, Yang, Fei, Kim, Minsun, Hendrickson, Kristi R. G., Ford, Eric, Kalet, Alan M., Cao, Ning, Dempsey, Claire, Sandison, George A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27074488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i2.6049
_version_ 1783310371757490176
author Meyer, Juergen
Nyflot, Matthew J.
Smith, Wade P.
Wootton, Landon S.
Young, Lori
Yang, Fei
Kim, Minsun
Hendrickson, Kristi R. G.
Ford, Eric
Kalet, Alan M.
Cao, Ning
Dempsey, Claire
Sandison, George A.
author_facet Meyer, Juergen
Nyflot, Matthew J.
Smith, Wade P.
Wootton, Landon S.
Young, Lori
Yang, Fei
Kim, Minsun
Hendrickson, Kristi R. G.
Ford, Eric
Kalet, Alan M.
Cao, Ning
Dempsey, Claire
Sandison, George A.
author_sort Meyer, Juergen
collection PubMed
description Monthly QA is recommended to verify the constancy of high‐energy electron beams generated for clinical use by linear accelerators. The tolerances are defined as [Formula: see text] in beam penetration according to AAPM task group report 142. The practical implementation is typically achieved by measuring the ratio of readings at two different depths, preferably near the depth of maximum dose and at the depth corresponding to half the dose maximum. Based on beam commissioning data, we show that the relationship between the ranges of energy ratios for different electron energies is highly nonlinear. We provide a formalism that translates measurement deviations in the reference ratios into change in beam penetration for electron energies for six Elekta (6‐18 MeV) and eight Varian (6‐22 MeV) electron beams. Experimental checks were conducted for each Elekta energy to compare calculated values with measurements, and it was shown that they are in agreement. For example, for a 6 MeV beam a deviation in the measured ionization ratio of [Formula: see text] might still be acceptable (i.e., be within [Formula: see text]), whereas for an 18 MeV beam the corresponding tolerance might be [Formula: see text]. These values strongly depend on the initial ratio chosen. In summary, the relationship between differences of the ionization ratio and the corresponding beam energy are derived. The findings can be translated into acceptable tolerance values for monthly QA of electron beam energies. PACS number(s): 87.55, 87.56
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5875568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58755682018-04-02 Electron beam energy QA — a note on measurement tolerances Meyer, Juergen Nyflot, Matthew J. Smith, Wade P. Wootton, Landon S. Young, Lori Yang, Fei Kim, Minsun Hendrickson, Kristi R. G. Ford, Eric Kalet, Alan M. Cao, Ning Dempsey, Claire Sandison, George A. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Monthly QA is recommended to verify the constancy of high‐energy electron beams generated for clinical use by linear accelerators. The tolerances are defined as [Formula: see text] in beam penetration according to AAPM task group report 142. The practical implementation is typically achieved by measuring the ratio of readings at two different depths, preferably near the depth of maximum dose and at the depth corresponding to half the dose maximum. Based on beam commissioning data, we show that the relationship between the ranges of energy ratios for different electron energies is highly nonlinear. We provide a formalism that translates measurement deviations in the reference ratios into change in beam penetration for electron energies for six Elekta (6‐18 MeV) and eight Varian (6‐22 MeV) electron beams. Experimental checks were conducted for each Elekta energy to compare calculated values with measurements, and it was shown that they are in agreement. For example, for a 6 MeV beam a deviation in the measured ionization ratio of [Formula: see text] might still be acceptable (i.e., be within [Formula: see text]), whereas for an 18 MeV beam the corresponding tolerance might be [Formula: see text]. These values strongly depend on the initial ratio chosen. In summary, the relationship between differences of the ionization ratio and the corresponding beam energy are derived. The findings can be translated into acceptable tolerance values for monthly QA of electron beam energies. PACS number(s): 87.55, 87.56 John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5875568/ /pubmed/27074488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i2.6049 Text en © 2016 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Meyer, Juergen
Nyflot, Matthew J.
Smith, Wade P.
Wootton, Landon S.
Young, Lori
Yang, Fei
Kim, Minsun
Hendrickson, Kristi R. G.
Ford, Eric
Kalet, Alan M.
Cao, Ning
Dempsey, Claire
Sandison, George A.
Electron beam energy QA — a note on measurement tolerances
title Electron beam energy QA — a note on measurement tolerances
title_full Electron beam energy QA — a note on measurement tolerances
title_fullStr Electron beam energy QA — a note on measurement tolerances
title_full_unstemmed Electron beam energy QA — a note on measurement tolerances
title_short Electron beam energy QA — a note on measurement tolerances
title_sort electron beam energy qa — a note on measurement tolerances
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27074488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i2.6049
work_keys_str_mv AT meyerjuergen electronbeamenergyqaanoteonmeasurementtolerances
AT nyflotmatthewj electronbeamenergyqaanoteonmeasurementtolerances
AT smithwadep electronbeamenergyqaanoteonmeasurementtolerances
AT woottonlandons electronbeamenergyqaanoteonmeasurementtolerances
AT younglori electronbeamenergyqaanoteonmeasurementtolerances
AT yangfei electronbeamenergyqaanoteonmeasurementtolerances
AT kimminsun electronbeamenergyqaanoteonmeasurementtolerances
AT hendricksonkristirg electronbeamenergyqaanoteonmeasurementtolerances
AT forderic electronbeamenergyqaanoteonmeasurementtolerances
AT kaletalanm electronbeamenergyqaanoteonmeasurementtolerances
AT caoning electronbeamenergyqaanoteonmeasurementtolerances
AT dempseyclaire electronbeamenergyqaanoteonmeasurementtolerances
AT sandisongeorgea electronbeamenergyqaanoteonmeasurementtolerances