Cargando…

Patient preferences in the treatment of hemophilia A: impact of storage conditions on product choice

OBJECTIVES: To gain insights into the usage of factor VIII (FVIII) products by patients diagnosed with moderate/severe hemophilia A, and to assess the impact and perceived importance of product storage. METHODS: In this study, 200 patients diagnosed with moderate or severe hemophilia A across seven...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tischer, Bernd, Marino, Renato, Napolitano, Mariasanta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29618923
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S151812
_version_ 1783310376113274880
author Tischer, Bernd
Marino, Renato
Napolitano, Mariasanta
author_facet Tischer, Bernd
Marino, Renato
Napolitano, Mariasanta
author_sort Tischer, Bernd
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To gain insights into the usage of factor VIII (FVIII) products by patients diagnosed with moderate/severe hemophilia A, and to assess the impact and perceived importance of product storage. METHODS: In this study, 200 patients diagnosed with moderate or severe hemophilia A across seven countries participated. Data were collected via a 30-minute, face-to-face interview in six countries and via a web-based survey in the seventh country. The questionnaire evaluated the effect of six features associated with FVIII products on the choice of the product; the structure and flow of data collection was designed to eliminate potential bias. RESULTS: Two-thirds of the respondents were using recombinant FVIII products. Only 17% were generally dissatisfied with current FVIII products, whereas >40% of the respondents were dissatisfied with frequency of administration and storage issues when traveling. The majority noted restrictions in their daily activities, particularly travel and sports. Most of them (85%), stored their product in the refrigerator and of these, 88% believed that it should always be stored there. These patients were also less satisfied with the product overall, more concerned about storage temperature, more restricted in daily activities, and spent more time on preparation and injection compared with patients who stored their product at room temperature. Conjoint analysis revealed that origin of FVIII (plasma-derived vs recombinant) was the strongest driver of product choice among all respondents, followed by storage flexibility (temperature), reconstitution device, and administration frequency. In this study, we did not investigate the efficacy and safety of the product. CONCLUSION: Not refrigerating FVIII products was associated with greater patient satisfaction and less restriction on daily activities. If efficacy and safety are unaffected, then storing FVIII at room temperature might have a positive impact on product choice. Few patients were aware that FVIII can be stored without refrigeration, suggesting that health care professionals who treat hemophilia should communicate this aspect to the patient (depending on the labeled option); this approach might offer patients greater flexibility when traveling and require less time for reconstitution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5875588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58755882018-04-04 Patient preferences in the treatment of hemophilia A: impact of storage conditions on product choice Tischer, Bernd Marino, Renato Napolitano, Mariasanta Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research OBJECTIVES: To gain insights into the usage of factor VIII (FVIII) products by patients diagnosed with moderate/severe hemophilia A, and to assess the impact and perceived importance of product storage. METHODS: In this study, 200 patients diagnosed with moderate or severe hemophilia A across seven countries participated. Data were collected via a 30-minute, face-to-face interview in six countries and via a web-based survey in the seventh country. The questionnaire evaluated the effect of six features associated with FVIII products on the choice of the product; the structure and flow of data collection was designed to eliminate potential bias. RESULTS: Two-thirds of the respondents were using recombinant FVIII products. Only 17% were generally dissatisfied with current FVIII products, whereas >40% of the respondents were dissatisfied with frequency of administration and storage issues when traveling. The majority noted restrictions in their daily activities, particularly travel and sports. Most of them (85%), stored their product in the refrigerator and of these, 88% believed that it should always be stored there. These patients were also less satisfied with the product overall, more concerned about storage temperature, more restricted in daily activities, and spent more time on preparation and injection compared with patients who stored their product at room temperature. Conjoint analysis revealed that origin of FVIII (plasma-derived vs recombinant) was the strongest driver of product choice among all respondents, followed by storage flexibility (temperature), reconstitution device, and administration frequency. In this study, we did not investigate the efficacy and safety of the product. CONCLUSION: Not refrigerating FVIII products was associated with greater patient satisfaction and less restriction on daily activities. If efficacy and safety are unaffected, then storing FVIII at room temperature might have a positive impact on product choice. Few patients were aware that FVIII can be stored without refrigeration, suggesting that health care professionals who treat hemophilia should communicate this aspect to the patient (depending on the labeled option); this approach might offer patients greater flexibility when traveling and require less time for reconstitution. Dove Medical Press 2018-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5875588/ /pubmed/29618923 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S151812 Text en © 2018 Tischer et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Tischer, Bernd
Marino, Renato
Napolitano, Mariasanta
Patient preferences in the treatment of hemophilia A: impact of storage conditions on product choice
title Patient preferences in the treatment of hemophilia A: impact of storage conditions on product choice
title_full Patient preferences in the treatment of hemophilia A: impact of storage conditions on product choice
title_fullStr Patient preferences in the treatment of hemophilia A: impact of storage conditions on product choice
title_full_unstemmed Patient preferences in the treatment of hemophilia A: impact of storage conditions on product choice
title_short Patient preferences in the treatment of hemophilia A: impact of storage conditions on product choice
title_sort patient preferences in the treatment of hemophilia a: impact of storage conditions on product choice
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29618923
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S151812
work_keys_str_mv AT tischerbernd patientpreferencesinthetreatmentofhemophiliaaimpactofstorageconditionsonproductchoice
AT marinorenato patientpreferencesinthetreatmentofhemophiliaaimpactofstorageconditionsonproductchoice
AT napolitanomariasanta patientpreferencesinthetreatmentofhemophiliaaimpactofstorageconditionsonproductchoice