Cargando…
Impacts of smoke-free public places legislation on inequalities in youth smoking uptake: study protocol for a secondary analysis of UK survey data
INTRODUCTION: Smoke-free public places legislation has been introduced in many countries to protect the public from the harmful effects of secondhand smoking. While evaluations of smoke-free policies have demonstrated major public health benefits, the impact on youth smoking and inequalities in smok...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29593026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022490 |
_version_ | 1783310380875907072 |
---|---|
author | Anyanwu, Philip Emeka Craig, Peter Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal Green, Michael James |
author_facet | Anyanwu, Philip Emeka Craig, Peter Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal Green, Michael James |
author_sort | Anyanwu, Philip Emeka |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Smoke-free public places legislation has been introduced in many countries to protect the public from the harmful effects of secondhand smoking. While evaluations of smoke-free policies have demonstrated major public health benefits, the impact on youth smoking and inequalities in smoking remains unclear. This project aims to evaluate how smoke-free public places legislation in the UK has impacted on inequalities in youth smoking uptake, and how much of any impact is via changes in parental smoking behaviour. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study will constitute secondary analyses of UK data (from the British Household Panel Survey and the Understanding Society study). Merging these datasets gives coverage of the period from 1994 to 2016. Missing data will be handled using multiple imputation. The primary outcomes are the rates and inequalities in initiation, experimentation, escalation to daily smoking and quitting among youths aged 11–15 years. Secondary outcomes include the prevalence of smoking among parents of these youths. Discrete-time event history analysis will be conducted to examine whether changes in the probability of youth smoking transitions are associated with the implementation of the smoke-free public places legislation; and whether any observed effects differ by socioeconomic position and parental smoking. A multilevel logistic regression model will be used to investigate whether there is a step change or change in trend for the prevalence of parental smoking after the policy was implemented. The models will be adjusted for relevant factors (including cigarette taxation, the change in the legal age for purchase of cigarettes and e-cigarette prevalence) that may be associated with the implementation of the legislation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This project will use anonymised survey data which have been collected following independent ethical review. The dissemination of the study findings will adopt multiple communication channels targeting both scientific and non-scientific audiences. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5875608 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58756082018-04-02 Impacts of smoke-free public places legislation on inequalities in youth smoking uptake: study protocol for a secondary analysis of UK survey data Anyanwu, Philip Emeka Craig, Peter Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal Green, Michael James BMJ Open Smoking and Tobacco INTRODUCTION: Smoke-free public places legislation has been introduced in many countries to protect the public from the harmful effects of secondhand smoking. While evaluations of smoke-free policies have demonstrated major public health benefits, the impact on youth smoking and inequalities in smoking remains unclear. This project aims to evaluate how smoke-free public places legislation in the UK has impacted on inequalities in youth smoking uptake, and how much of any impact is via changes in parental smoking behaviour. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study will constitute secondary analyses of UK data (from the British Household Panel Survey and the Understanding Society study). Merging these datasets gives coverage of the period from 1994 to 2016. Missing data will be handled using multiple imputation. The primary outcomes are the rates and inequalities in initiation, experimentation, escalation to daily smoking and quitting among youths aged 11–15 years. Secondary outcomes include the prevalence of smoking among parents of these youths. Discrete-time event history analysis will be conducted to examine whether changes in the probability of youth smoking transitions are associated with the implementation of the smoke-free public places legislation; and whether any observed effects differ by socioeconomic position and parental smoking. A multilevel logistic regression model will be used to investigate whether there is a step change or change in trend for the prevalence of parental smoking after the policy was implemented. The models will be adjusted for relevant factors (including cigarette taxation, the change in the legal age for purchase of cigarettes and e-cigarette prevalence) that may be associated with the implementation of the legislation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This project will use anonymised survey data which have been collected following independent ethical review. The dissemination of the study findings will adopt multiple communication channels targeting both scientific and non-scientific audiences. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5875608/ /pubmed/29593026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022490 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Smoking and Tobacco Anyanwu, Philip Emeka Craig, Peter Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal Green, Michael James Impacts of smoke-free public places legislation on inequalities in youth smoking uptake: study protocol for a secondary analysis of UK survey data |
title | Impacts of smoke-free public places legislation on inequalities in youth smoking uptake: study protocol for a secondary analysis of UK survey data |
title_full | Impacts of smoke-free public places legislation on inequalities in youth smoking uptake: study protocol for a secondary analysis of UK survey data |
title_fullStr | Impacts of smoke-free public places legislation on inequalities in youth smoking uptake: study protocol for a secondary analysis of UK survey data |
title_full_unstemmed | Impacts of smoke-free public places legislation on inequalities in youth smoking uptake: study protocol for a secondary analysis of UK survey data |
title_short | Impacts of smoke-free public places legislation on inequalities in youth smoking uptake: study protocol for a secondary analysis of UK survey data |
title_sort | impacts of smoke-free public places legislation on inequalities in youth smoking uptake: study protocol for a secondary analysis of uk survey data |
topic | Smoking and Tobacco |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29593026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022490 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anyanwuphilipemeka impactsofsmokefreepublicplaceslegislationoninequalitiesinyouthsmokinguptakestudyprotocolforasecondaryanalysisofuksurveydata AT craigpeter impactsofsmokefreepublicplaceslegislationoninequalitiesinyouthsmokinguptakestudyprotocolforasecondaryanalysisofuksurveydata AT katikireddisrinivasavittal impactsofsmokefreepublicplaceslegislationoninequalitiesinyouthsmokinguptakestudyprotocolforasecondaryanalysisofuksurveydata AT greenmichaeljames impactsofsmokefreepublicplaceslegislationoninequalitiesinyouthsmokinguptakestudyprotocolforasecondaryanalysisofuksurveydata |