Cargando…

Impacts of smoke-free public places legislation on inequalities in youth smoking uptake: study protocol for a secondary analysis of UK survey data

INTRODUCTION: Smoke-free public places legislation has been introduced in many countries to protect the public from the harmful effects of secondhand smoking. While evaluations of smoke-free policies have demonstrated major public health benefits, the impact on youth smoking and inequalities in smok...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anyanwu, Philip Emeka, Craig, Peter, Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal, Green, Michael James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29593026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022490
_version_ 1783310380875907072
author Anyanwu, Philip Emeka
Craig, Peter
Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
Green, Michael James
author_facet Anyanwu, Philip Emeka
Craig, Peter
Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
Green, Michael James
author_sort Anyanwu, Philip Emeka
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Smoke-free public places legislation has been introduced in many countries to protect the public from the harmful effects of secondhand smoking. While evaluations of smoke-free policies have demonstrated major public health benefits, the impact on youth smoking and inequalities in smoking remains unclear. This project aims to evaluate how smoke-free public places legislation in the UK has impacted on inequalities in youth smoking uptake, and how much of any impact is via changes in parental smoking behaviour. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study will constitute secondary analyses of UK data (from the British Household Panel Survey and the Understanding Society study). Merging these datasets gives coverage of the period from 1994 to 2016. Missing data will be handled using multiple imputation. The primary outcomes are the rates and inequalities in initiation, experimentation, escalation to daily smoking and quitting among youths aged 11–15 years. Secondary outcomes include the prevalence of smoking among parents of these youths. Discrete-time event history analysis will be conducted to examine whether changes in the probability of youth smoking transitions are associated with the implementation of the smoke-free public places legislation; and whether any observed effects differ by socioeconomic position and parental smoking. A multilevel logistic regression model will be used to investigate whether there is a step change or change in trend for the prevalence of parental smoking after the policy was implemented. The models will be adjusted for relevant factors (including cigarette taxation, the change in the legal age for purchase of cigarettes and e-cigarette prevalence) that may be associated with the implementation of the legislation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This project will use anonymised survey data which have been collected following independent ethical review. The dissemination of the study findings will adopt multiple communication channels targeting both scientific and non-scientific audiences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5875608
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58756082018-04-02 Impacts of smoke-free public places legislation on inequalities in youth smoking uptake: study protocol for a secondary analysis of UK survey data Anyanwu, Philip Emeka Craig, Peter Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal Green, Michael James BMJ Open Smoking and Tobacco INTRODUCTION: Smoke-free public places legislation has been introduced in many countries to protect the public from the harmful effects of secondhand smoking. While evaluations of smoke-free policies have demonstrated major public health benefits, the impact on youth smoking and inequalities in smoking remains unclear. This project aims to evaluate how smoke-free public places legislation in the UK has impacted on inequalities in youth smoking uptake, and how much of any impact is via changes in parental smoking behaviour. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study will constitute secondary analyses of UK data (from the British Household Panel Survey and the Understanding Society study). Merging these datasets gives coverage of the period from 1994 to 2016. Missing data will be handled using multiple imputation. The primary outcomes are the rates and inequalities in initiation, experimentation, escalation to daily smoking and quitting among youths aged 11–15 years. Secondary outcomes include the prevalence of smoking among parents of these youths. Discrete-time event history analysis will be conducted to examine whether changes in the probability of youth smoking transitions are associated with the implementation of the smoke-free public places legislation; and whether any observed effects differ by socioeconomic position and parental smoking. A multilevel logistic regression model will be used to investigate whether there is a step change or change in trend for the prevalence of parental smoking after the policy was implemented. The models will be adjusted for relevant factors (including cigarette taxation, the change in the legal age for purchase of cigarettes and e-cigarette prevalence) that may be associated with the implementation of the legislation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This project will use anonymised survey data which have been collected following independent ethical review. The dissemination of the study findings will adopt multiple communication channels targeting both scientific and non-scientific audiences. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5875608/ /pubmed/29593026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022490 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Smoking and Tobacco
Anyanwu, Philip Emeka
Craig, Peter
Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
Green, Michael James
Impacts of smoke-free public places legislation on inequalities in youth smoking uptake: study protocol for a secondary analysis of UK survey data
title Impacts of smoke-free public places legislation on inequalities in youth smoking uptake: study protocol for a secondary analysis of UK survey data
title_full Impacts of smoke-free public places legislation on inequalities in youth smoking uptake: study protocol for a secondary analysis of UK survey data
title_fullStr Impacts of smoke-free public places legislation on inequalities in youth smoking uptake: study protocol for a secondary analysis of UK survey data
title_full_unstemmed Impacts of smoke-free public places legislation on inequalities in youth smoking uptake: study protocol for a secondary analysis of UK survey data
title_short Impacts of smoke-free public places legislation on inequalities in youth smoking uptake: study protocol for a secondary analysis of UK survey data
title_sort impacts of smoke-free public places legislation on inequalities in youth smoking uptake: study protocol for a secondary analysis of uk survey data
topic Smoking and Tobacco
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29593026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022490
work_keys_str_mv AT anyanwuphilipemeka impactsofsmokefreepublicplaceslegislationoninequalitiesinyouthsmokinguptakestudyprotocolforasecondaryanalysisofuksurveydata
AT craigpeter impactsofsmokefreepublicplaceslegislationoninequalitiesinyouthsmokinguptakestudyprotocolforasecondaryanalysisofuksurveydata
AT katikireddisrinivasavittal impactsofsmokefreepublicplaceslegislationoninequalitiesinyouthsmokinguptakestudyprotocolforasecondaryanalysisofuksurveydata
AT greenmichaeljames impactsofsmokefreepublicplaceslegislationoninequalitiesinyouthsmokinguptakestudyprotocolforasecondaryanalysisofuksurveydata