Cargando…

A systematic assessment of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in high-impact medical journals related to cancer

OBJECTIVE: To compare cancer-related systematic reviews (SRs) published in the Cochrane Database of SRs (CDSR) and high-impact journals, with respect to type, content, quality and citation rates. DESIGN: Methodological SR with assessment and comparison of SRs and meta-analyses. Two authors independe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Goldkuhle, Marius, Narayan, Vikram M, Weigl, Aaron, Dahm, Philipp, Skoetz, Nicole
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:	Research Methods
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29581210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020869

Ejemplares similares

A PRISMA assessment of the reporting quality of systematic reviews of nursing published in the Cochrane Library and paper-based journals
por: Zhang, Juxia, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Claims of ‘no difference’ or ‘no effect’ in Cochrane and other systematic reviews
por: Marson Smith, Phoebe Rose, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Methods to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Treweek, Shaun, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews
por: Langendam, Miranda W, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Intravesical gemcitabine for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: An abridged Cochrane Review
por: Han, Mi Ah, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Consistency of causal claims in observational studies: a review of papers published in a general medical journal
por: Olarte Parra, Camila, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The Cochrane Collaboration withdraws a review on methylphenidate for adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
por: Boesen, Kim, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

A descriptive analysis of non-Cochrane child-relevant systematic reviews published in 2014
por: Gates, Michelle, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
por: Turner, Lucy, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Discrepancies in Outcome Reporting Exist Between Protocols and Published Oral Health Cochrane Systematic Reviews
por: Pandis, Nikolaos, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Presentation approaches for enhancing interpretability of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in meta-analysis: a protocol for a systematic survey of Cochrane reviews
por: Devji, Tahira, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Evaluation of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials: overview of published comments and analysis of user practice in Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews
por: Jørgensen, Lars, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Assessing the magnitude of changes from protocol to publication—a survey on Cochrane and non-Cochrane Systematic Reviews
por: Siebert, Maximilian, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Citation of updated and co-published Cochrane Methodology Reviews
por: Zhu, Linlin, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Selective Serotonin Re-Uptake Inhibitors for Premature Ejaculation in Adult Men: A Cochrane Systematic Review
por: Sathianathen, Niranjan J., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane review(a)
por: Turner, Lucy, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Cochrane Eyes and Vision: systematic reviews on myopia
por: Evans, Jennifer
Publicado: (2019)

The quality of Cochrane systematic reviews of acupuncture: an overview
por: Ji, Zhaochen, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Alignment of systematic reviews published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Database of Abstracts and Reviews of Effectiveness with global burden-of-disease data: a bibliographic analysis
por: Yoong, Sze Lin, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

6: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS IN COCHRANE ARRHYTHMIAS SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
por: Parnianfard, Neda, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Assessing the compliance of systematic review articles published in leading dermatology journals with the PRISMA statement guidelines: A systematic review
por: Gundogan, Buket, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Transurethral Microwave Thermotherapy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: An Updated Cochrane Review
por: Franco, Juan Victor Ariel, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Maintaining relevance in HIV systematic reviews: an evaluation of Cochrane reviews
por: Eshun-Wilson, Ingrid, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Statistical Multiplicity in Systematic Reviews of Anaesthesia Interventions: A Quantification and Comparison between Cochrane and Non-Cochrane Reviews
por: Imberger, Georgina, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Cochrane Systematic Reviews of Chinese Herbal Medicines: An Overview
por: Hu, Jing, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Corticosteroids for sepsis: registry versus Cochrane systematic review!
por: Annane, Djillali
Publicado: (2010)

Ginseng for Erectile Dysfunction: A Cochrane Systematic Review
por: Lee, Hye Won, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
por: Higgins, Julian P T, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Assessment of health equity consideration in Cochrane systematic reviews and primary studies on urolithiasis
por: Basirat, Reyhane, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Assessing the compliance of systematic review articles published in leading dermatology journals with the PRISMA statement guidelines: A systematic review protocol
por: Gundogan, Buket, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
por: Bow, Simon, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Prioritising Cochrane reviews to be updated with health equity focus
por: Tomlinson, Eve, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Methods and guidance on conducting, reporting, publishing and appraising living systematic reviews: a scoping review protocol
por: Iannizzi, Claire, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Most Cochrane systematic reviews and protocols did not adhere to the Cochrane's risk of bias 2.0 tool
por: Martimbianco, Ana Luiza Cabrera, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Quality of reporting of systematic reviews published in “evidence-based” Chinese journals
por: Li, Jin-long, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Quality assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in Saudi journals from 1997 to 2017
por: Natto, Zuhair S., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Quality Assessment of Published Systematic Reviews in High Impact Cardiology Journals: Revisiting the Evidence Pyramid
por: Abushouk, Abdelrahman I., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Reporting and methodologic quality of Cochrane Neonatal review group systematic reviews
por: Al Faleh, Khalid, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Outcome reporting bias in Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis
por: Shah, Kieran, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

A suggestion for quality assessment in systematic reviews of observational studies in nutritional epidemiology
por: Bae, Jong-Myon
Publicado: (2016)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_hlr2lo83u2ouclre12tbeu41ls