Cargando…
Assessing the impact of care farms on quality of life and offending: a pilot study among probation service users in England
OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility of conducting a cost-effectiveness study of using care farms (CFs) to improve quality of life and reduce reoffending among offenders undertaking community orders (COs). To pilot questionnaires to assess quality of life, connection to nature, lifestyle behaviours...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29550778 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019296 |
_version_ | 1783310393346621440 |
---|---|
author | Elsey, Helen Farragher, Tracey Tubeuf, Sandy Bragg, Rachel Elings, Marjolein Brennan, Cathy Gold, Rochelle Shickle, Darren Wickramasekera, Nyantara Richardson, Zoe Cade, Janet Murray, Jenni |
author_facet | Elsey, Helen Farragher, Tracey Tubeuf, Sandy Bragg, Rachel Elings, Marjolein Brennan, Cathy Gold, Rochelle Shickle, Darren Wickramasekera, Nyantara Richardson, Zoe Cade, Janet Murray, Jenni |
author_sort | Elsey, Helen |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility of conducting a cost-effectiveness study of using care farms (CFs) to improve quality of life and reduce reoffending among offenders undertaking community orders (COs). To pilot questionnaires to assess quality of life, connection to nature, lifestyle behaviours, health and social-care use. To assess recruitment and retention at 6 months and feasibility of data linkage to Police National Computer (PNC) reconvictions data and data held by probation services. DESIGN: Pilot study using questionnaires to assess quality of life, individually linked to police and probation data. SETTING: The pilot study was conducted in three probation service regions in England. Each site included a CF and at least one comparator CO project. CFs are working farms used with a range of clients, including offenders, for therapeutic purposes. The three CFs included one aquaponics and horticulture social enterprise, a religious charity focusing on horticulture and a family-run cattle farm. Comparator projects included sorting secondhand clothes and activities to address alcohol misuse and anger management. PARTICIPANTS: We recruited 134 adults (over 18) serving COs in England, 29% female. RESULTS: 52% of participants completed follow-up questionnaires. Privatisation of UK probation trusts in 2014 negatively impacted on recruitment and retention. Linkage to PNC data was a more successful means of follow-up, with 90% consenting to access their probation and PNC data. Collection of health and social-care costs and quality-adjusted life year derivation were feasible. Propensity score adjustment provided a viable comparison method despite differences between comparators. We found worse health and higher reoffending risk among CF participants due to allocation of challenging offenders to CFs, making risk of reoffending a confounder. CONCLUSIONS: Recruitment would be feasible in a more stable probation environment. Follow-up was challenging; however, assessing reconvictions from PNC data is feasible and a potential primary outcome for future studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5875661 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58756612018-04-02 Assessing the impact of care farms on quality of life and offending: a pilot study among probation service users in England Elsey, Helen Farragher, Tracey Tubeuf, Sandy Bragg, Rachel Elings, Marjolein Brennan, Cathy Gold, Rochelle Shickle, Darren Wickramasekera, Nyantara Richardson, Zoe Cade, Janet Murray, Jenni BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility of conducting a cost-effectiveness study of using care farms (CFs) to improve quality of life and reduce reoffending among offenders undertaking community orders (COs). To pilot questionnaires to assess quality of life, connection to nature, lifestyle behaviours, health and social-care use. To assess recruitment and retention at 6 months and feasibility of data linkage to Police National Computer (PNC) reconvictions data and data held by probation services. DESIGN: Pilot study using questionnaires to assess quality of life, individually linked to police and probation data. SETTING: The pilot study was conducted in three probation service regions in England. Each site included a CF and at least one comparator CO project. CFs are working farms used with a range of clients, including offenders, for therapeutic purposes. The three CFs included one aquaponics and horticulture social enterprise, a religious charity focusing on horticulture and a family-run cattle farm. Comparator projects included sorting secondhand clothes and activities to address alcohol misuse and anger management. PARTICIPANTS: We recruited 134 adults (over 18) serving COs in England, 29% female. RESULTS: 52% of participants completed follow-up questionnaires. Privatisation of UK probation trusts in 2014 negatively impacted on recruitment and retention. Linkage to PNC data was a more successful means of follow-up, with 90% consenting to access their probation and PNC data. Collection of health and social-care costs and quality-adjusted life year derivation were feasible. Propensity score adjustment provided a viable comparison method despite differences between comparators. We found worse health and higher reoffending risk among CF participants due to allocation of challenging offenders to CFs, making risk of reoffending a confounder. CONCLUSIONS: Recruitment would be feasible in a more stable probation environment. Follow-up was challenging; however, assessing reconvictions from PNC data is feasible and a potential primary outcome for future studies. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5875661/ /pubmed/29550778 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019296 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Public Health Elsey, Helen Farragher, Tracey Tubeuf, Sandy Bragg, Rachel Elings, Marjolein Brennan, Cathy Gold, Rochelle Shickle, Darren Wickramasekera, Nyantara Richardson, Zoe Cade, Janet Murray, Jenni Assessing the impact of care farms on quality of life and offending: a pilot study among probation service users in England |
title | Assessing the impact of care farms on quality of life and offending: a pilot study among probation service users in England |
title_full | Assessing the impact of care farms on quality of life and offending: a pilot study among probation service users in England |
title_fullStr | Assessing the impact of care farms on quality of life and offending: a pilot study among probation service users in England |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the impact of care farms on quality of life and offending: a pilot study among probation service users in England |
title_short | Assessing the impact of care farms on quality of life and offending: a pilot study among probation service users in England |
title_sort | assessing the impact of care farms on quality of life and offending: a pilot study among probation service users in england |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29550778 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019296 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elseyhelen assessingtheimpactofcarefarmsonqualityoflifeandoffendingapilotstudyamongprobationserviceusersinengland AT farraghertracey assessingtheimpactofcarefarmsonqualityoflifeandoffendingapilotstudyamongprobationserviceusersinengland AT tubeufsandy assessingtheimpactofcarefarmsonqualityoflifeandoffendingapilotstudyamongprobationserviceusersinengland AT braggrachel assessingtheimpactofcarefarmsonqualityoflifeandoffendingapilotstudyamongprobationserviceusersinengland AT elingsmarjolein assessingtheimpactofcarefarmsonqualityoflifeandoffendingapilotstudyamongprobationserviceusersinengland AT brennancathy assessingtheimpactofcarefarmsonqualityoflifeandoffendingapilotstudyamongprobationserviceusersinengland AT goldrochelle assessingtheimpactofcarefarmsonqualityoflifeandoffendingapilotstudyamongprobationserviceusersinengland AT shickledarren assessingtheimpactofcarefarmsonqualityoflifeandoffendingapilotstudyamongprobationserviceusersinengland AT wickramasekeranyantara assessingtheimpactofcarefarmsonqualityoflifeandoffendingapilotstudyamongprobationserviceusersinengland AT richardsonzoe assessingtheimpactofcarefarmsonqualityoflifeandoffendingapilotstudyamongprobationserviceusersinengland AT cadejanet assessingtheimpactofcarefarmsonqualityoflifeandoffendingapilotstudyamongprobationserviceusersinengland AT murrayjenni assessingtheimpactofcarefarmsonqualityoflifeandoffendingapilotstudyamongprobationserviceusersinengland |