Cargando…

Assessing the impact of care farms on quality of life and offending: a pilot study among probation service users in England

OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility of conducting a cost-effectiveness study of using care farms (CFs) to improve quality of life and reduce reoffending among offenders undertaking community orders (COs). To pilot questionnaires to assess quality of life, connection to nature, lifestyle behaviours...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elsey, Helen, Farragher, Tracey, Tubeuf, Sandy, Bragg, Rachel, Elings, Marjolein, Brennan, Cathy, Gold, Rochelle, Shickle, Darren, Wickramasekera, Nyantara, Richardson, Zoe, Cade, Janet, Murray, Jenni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29550778
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019296
_version_ 1783310393346621440
author Elsey, Helen
Farragher, Tracey
Tubeuf, Sandy
Bragg, Rachel
Elings, Marjolein
Brennan, Cathy
Gold, Rochelle
Shickle, Darren
Wickramasekera, Nyantara
Richardson, Zoe
Cade, Janet
Murray, Jenni
author_facet Elsey, Helen
Farragher, Tracey
Tubeuf, Sandy
Bragg, Rachel
Elings, Marjolein
Brennan, Cathy
Gold, Rochelle
Shickle, Darren
Wickramasekera, Nyantara
Richardson, Zoe
Cade, Janet
Murray, Jenni
author_sort Elsey, Helen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility of conducting a cost-effectiveness study of using care farms (CFs) to improve quality of life and reduce reoffending among offenders undertaking community orders (COs). To pilot questionnaires to assess quality of life, connection to nature, lifestyle behaviours, health and social-care use. To assess recruitment and retention at 6 months and feasibility of data linkage to Police National Computer (PNC) reconvictions data and data held by probation services. DESIGN: Pilot study using questionnaires to assess quality of life, individually linked to police and probation data. SETTING: The pilot study was conducted in three probation service regions in England. Each site included a CF and at least one comparator CO project. CFs are working farms used with a range of clients, including offenders, for therapeutic purposes. The three CFs included one aquaponics and horticulture social enterprise, a religious charity focusing on horticulture and a family-run cattle farm. Comparator projects included sorting secondhand clothes and activities to address alcohol misuse and anger management. PARTICIPANTS: We recruited 134 adults (over 18) serving COs in England, 29% female. RESULTS: 52% of participants completed follow-up questionnaires. Privatisation of UK probation trusts in 2014 negatively impacted on recruitment and retention. Linkage to PNC data was a more successful means of follow-up, with 90% consenting to access their probation and PNC data. Collection of health and social-care costs and quality-adjusted life year derivation were feasible. Propensity score adjustment provided a viable comparison method despite differences between comparators. We found worse health and higher reoffending risk among CF participants due to allocation of challenging offenders to CFs, making risk of reoffending a confounder. CONCLUSIONS: Recruitment would be feasible in a more stable probation environment. Follow-up was challenging; however, assessing reconvictions from PNC data is feasible and a potential primary outcome for future studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5875661
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58756612018-04-02 Assessing the impact of care farms on quality of life and offending: a pilot study among probation service users in England Elsey, Helen Farragher, Tracey Tubeuf, Sandy Bragg, Rachel Elings, Marjolein Brennan, Cathy Gold, Rochelle Shickle, Darren Wickramasekera, Nyantara Richardson, Zoe Cade, Janet Murray, Jenni BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility of conducting a cost-effectiveness study of using care farms (CFs) to improve quality of life and reduce reoffending among offenders undertaking community orders (COs). To pilot questionnaires to assess quality of life, connection to nature, lifestyle behaviours, health and social-care use. To assess recruitment and retention at 6 months and feasibility of data linkage to Police National Computer (PNC) reconvictions data and data held by probation services. DESIGN: Pilot study using questionnaires to assess quality of life, individually linked to police and probation data. SETTING: The pilot study was conducted in three probation service regions in England. Each site included a CF and at least one comparator CO project. CFs are working farms used with a range of clients, including offenders, for therapeutic purposes. The three CFs included one aquaponics and horticulture social enterprise, a religious charity focusing on horticulture and a family-run cattle farm. Comparator projects included sorting secondhand clothes and activities to address alcohol misuse and anger management. PARTICIPANTS: We recruited 134 adults (over 18) serving COs in England, 29% female. RESULTS: 52% of participants completed follow-up questionnaires. Privatisation of UK probation trusts in 2014 negatively impacted on recruitment and retention. Linkage to PNC data was a more successful means of follow-up, with 90% consenting to access their probation and PNC data. Collection of health and social-care costs and quality-adjusted life year derivation were feasible. Propensity score adjustment provided a viable comparison method despite differences between comparators. We found worse health and higher reoffending risk among CF participants due to allocation of challenging offenders to CFs, making risk of reoffending a confounder. CONCLUSIONS: Recruitment would be feasible in a more stable probation environment. Follow-up was challenging; however, assessing reconvictions from PNC data is feasible and a potential primary outcome for future studies. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5875661/ /pubmed/29550778 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019296 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Public Health
Elsey, Helen
Farragher, Tracey
Tubeuf, Sandy
Bragg, Rachel
Elings, Marjolein
Brennan, Cathy
Gold, Rochelle
Shickle, Darren
Wickramasekera, Nyantara
Richardson, Zoe
Cade, Janet
Murray, Jenni
Assessing the impact of care farms on quality of life and offending: a pilot study among probation service users in England
title Assessing the impact of care farms on quality of life and offending: a pilot study among probation service users in England
title_full Assessing the impact of care farms on quality of life and offending: a pilot study among probation service users in England
title_fullStr Assessing the impact of care farms on quality of life and offending: a pilot study among probation service users in England
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the impact of care farms on quality of life and offending: a pilot study among probation service users in England
title_short Assessing the impact of care farms on quality of life and offending: a pilot study among probation service users in England
title_sort assessing the impact of care farms on quality of life and offending: a pilot study among probation service users in england
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29550778
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019296
work_keys_str_mv AT elseyhelen assessingtheimpactofcarefarmsonqualityoflifeandoffendingapilotstudyamongprobationserviceusersinengland
AT farraghertracey assessingtheimpactofcarefarmsonqualityoflifeandoffendingapilotstudyamongprobationserviceusersinengland
AT tubeufsandy assessingtheimpactofcarefarmsonqualityoflifeandoffendingapilotstudyamongprobationserviceusersinengland
AT braggrachel assessingtheimpactofcarefarmsonqualityoflifeandoffendingapilotstudyamongprobationserviceusersinengland
AT elingsmarjolein assessingtheimpactofcarefarmsonqualityoflifeandoffendingapilotstudyamongprobationserviceusersinengland
AT brennancathy assessingtheimpactofcarefarmsonqualityoflifeandoffendingapilotstudyamongprobationserviceusersinengland
AT goldrochelle assessingtheimpactofcarefarmsonqualityoflifeandoffendingapilotstudyamongprobationserviceusersinengland
AT shickledarren assessingtheimpactofcarefarmsonqualityoflifeandoffendingapilotstudyamongprobationserviceusersinengland
AT wickramasekeranyantara assessingtheimpactofcarefarmsonqualityoflifeandoffendingapilotstudyamongprobationserviceusersinengland
AT richardsonzoe assessingtheimpactofcarefarmsonqualityoflifeandoffendingapilotstudyamongprobationserviceusersinengland
AT cadejanet assessingtheimpactofcarefarmsonqualityoflifeandoffendingapilotstudyamongprobationserviceusersinengland
AT murrayjenni assessingtheimpactofcarefarmsonqualityoflifeandoffendingapilotstudyamongprobationserviceusersinengland