Cargando…
Randomised controlled trial of rhinothermy for treatment of the common cold: a feasibility study
OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of rhinothermy for the common cold. DESIGN: Open label, randomised, controlled feasibility study. SETTING: Single-centre research institute in New Zealand recruiting participants from the community. PARTICIPANTS: 30 adult...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875674/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29593018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019350 |
_version_ | 1783310396419997696 |
---|---|
author | van de Hei, Susanne McKinstry, Steven Bardsley, George Weatherall, Mark Beasley, Richard Fingleton, James |
author_facet | van de Hei, Susanne McKinstry, Steven Bardsley, George Weatherall, Mark Beasley, Richard Fingleton, James |
author_sort | van de Hei, Susanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of rhinothermy for the common cold. DESIGN: Open label, randomised, controlled feasibility study. SETTING: Single-centre research institute in New Zealand recruiting participants from the community. PARTICIPANTS: 30 adult participants with symptoms of a common cold, presenting within 48 hours of the onset of symptoms. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive either 35 L/min of 100% humidified air at 41°C via high flow nasal cannulae, 2 hours per day for up to 5 days (rhinothermy), or vitamin C 250 mg daily for 5 days (control). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the proportion of screened candidates who were randomised. Secondary outcomes included: proportion of randomised participants who completed the study; modified Jackson scores from randomisation to 10 days after initiation of randomised regimen; time until feeling ‘a lot better’ compared with study entry; time until resolution of symptoms or symptom score at 10 days postrandomisation; proportion of organisms identified by PCR analysis of nasal swabs taken at baseline; the patterns of use of the rhinothermy device; estimated adherence of the control group; and rhinothermy device tolerability. RESULTS: In all 30/79 (38%, 95% CI 27% to 50%) of potential participants screened for eligibility were randomised. Rhinothermy was well tolerated, and all randomised participants completed the study (100%, 95% CI 88% to 100%). The reduction from baseline in the modified Jackson score was greater with rhinothermy compared with control at days 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, with the maximum difference at day 4 (−6.4, 95% CI −9.4 to −3.3). The substantial clinical benefit threshold for modified Jackson score was a 5-unit change. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that an RCT of rhinothermy compared with low-dose vitamin C in the treatment of the common cold is feasible. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12616000470493; Results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5875674 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58756742018-04-02 Randomised controlled trial of rhinothermy for treatment of the common cold: a feasibility study van de Hei, Susanne McKinstry, Steven Bardsley, George Weatherall, Mark Beasley, Richard Fingleton, James BMJ Open Respiratory Medicine OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of rhinothermy for the common cold. DESIGN: Open label, randomised, controlled feasibility study. SETTING: Single-centre research institute in New Zealand recruiting participants from the community. PARTICIPANTS: 30 adult participants with symptoms of a common cold, presenting within 48 hours of the onset of symptoms. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive either 35 L/min of 100% humidified air at 41°C via high flow nasal cannulae, 2 hours per day for up to 5 days (rhinothermy), or vitamin C 250 mg daily for 5 days (control). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the proportion of screened candidates who were randomised. Secondary outcomes included: proportion of randomised participants who completed the study; modified Jackson scores from randomisation to 10 days after initiation of randomised regimen; time until feeling ‘a lot better’ compared with study entry; time until resolution of symptoms or symptom score at 10 days postrandomisation; proportion of organisms identified by PCR analysis of nasal swabs taken at baseline; the patterns of use of the rhinothermy device; estimated adherence of the control group; and rhinothermy device tolerability. RESULTS: In all 30/79 (38%, 95% CI 27% to 50%) of potential participants screened for eligibility were randomised. Rhinothermy was well tolerated, and all randomised participants completed the study (100%, 95% CI 88% to 100%). The reduction from baseline in the modified Jackson score was greater with rhinothermy compared with control at days 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, with the maximum difference at day 4 (−6.4, 95% CI −9.4 to −3.3). The substantial clinical benefit threshold for modified Jackson score was a 5-unit change. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that an RCT of rhinothermy compared with low-dose vitamin C in the treatment of the common cold is feasible. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12616000470493; Results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5875674/ /pubmed/29593018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019350 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Respiratory Medicine van de Hei, Susanne McKinstry, Steven Bardsley, George Weatherall, Mark Beasley, Richard Fingleton, James Randomised controlled trial of rhinothermy for treatment of the common cold: a feasibility study |
title | Randomised controlled trial of rhinothermy for treatment of the common cold: a feasibility study |
title_full | Randomised controlled trial of rhinothermy for treatment of the common cold: a feasibility study |
title_fullStr | Randomised controlled trial of rhinothermy for treatment of the common cold: a feasibility study |
title_full_unstemmed | Randomised controlled trial of rhinothermy for treatment of the common cold: a feasibility study |
title_short | Randomised controlled trial of rhinothermy for treatment of the common cold: a feasibility study |
title_sort | randomised controlled trial of rhinothermy for treatment of the common cold: a feasibility study |
topic | Respiratory Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875674/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29593018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019350 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandeheisusanne randomisedcontrolledtrialofrhinothermyfortreatmentofthecommoncoldafeasibilitystudy AT mckinstrysteven randomisedcontrolledtrialofrhinothermyfortreatmentofthecommoncoldafeasibilitystudy AT bardsleygeorge randomisedcontrolledtrialofrhinothermyfortreatmentofthecommoncoldafeasibilitystudy AT weatherallmark randomisedcontrolledtrialofrhinothermyfortreatmentofthecommoncoldafeasibilitystudy AT beasleyrichard randomisedcontrolledtrialofrhinothermyfortreatmentofthecommoncoldafeasibilitystudy AT fingletonjames randomisedcontrolledtrialofrhinothermyfortreatmentofthecommoncoldafeasibilitystudy |