Cargando…

Randomised controlled trial of rhinothermy for treatment of the common cold: a feasibility study

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of rhinothermy for the common cold. DESIGN: Open label, randomised, controlled feasibility study. SETTING: Single-centre research institute in New Zealand recruiting participants from the community. PARTICIPANTS: 30 adult...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van de Hei, Susanne, McKinstry, Steven, Bardsley, George, Weatherall, Mark, Beasley, Richard, Fingleton, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29593018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019350
_version_ 1783310396419997696
author van de Hei, Susanne
McKinstry, Steven
Bardsley, George
Weatherall, Mark
Beasley, Richard
Fingleton, James
author_facet van de Hei, Susanne
McKinstry, Steven
Bardsley, George
Weatherall, Mark
Beasley, Richard
Fingleton, James
author_sort van de Hei, Susanne
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of rhinothermy for the common cold. DESIGN: Open label, randomised, controlled feasibility study. SETTING: Single-centre research institute in New Zealand recruiting participants from the community. PARTICIPANTS: 30 adult participants with symptoms of a common cold, presenting within 48 hours of the onset of symptoms. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive either 35 L/min of 100% humidified air at 41°C via high flow nasal cannulae, 2 hours per day for up to 5 days (rhinothermy), or vitamin C 250 mg daily for 5 days (control). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the proportion of screened candidates who were randomised. Secondary outcomes included: proportion of randomised participants who completed the study; modified Jackson scores from randomisation to 10 days after initiation of randomised regimen; time until feeling ‘a lot better’ compared with study entry; time until resolution of symptoms or symptom score at 10 days postrandomisation; proportion of organisms identified by PCR analysis of nasal swabs taken at baseline; the patterns of use of the rhinothermy device; estimated adherence of the control group; and rhinothermy device tolerability. RESULTS: In all 30/79 (38%, 95% CI 27% to 50%) of potential participants screened for eligibility were randomised. Rhinothermy was well tolerated, and all randomised participants completed the study (100%, 95% CI 88% to 100%). The reduction from baseline in the modified Jackson score was greater with rhinothermy compared with control at days 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, with the maximum difference at day 4 (−6.4, 95% CI −9.4 to −3.3). The substantial clinical benefit threshold for modified Jackson score was a 5-unit change. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that an RCT of rhinothermy compared with low-dose vitamin C in the treatment of the common cold is feasible. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12616000470493; Results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5875674
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58756742018-04-02 Randomised controlled trial of rhinothermy for treatment of the common cold: a feasibility study van de Hei, Susanne McKinstry, Steven Bardsley, George Weatherall, Mark Beasley, Richard Fingleton, James BMJ Open Respiratory Medicine OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of rhinothermy for the common cold. DESIGN: Open label, randomised, controlled feasibility study. SETTING: Single-centre research institute in New Zealand recruiting participants from the community. PARTICIPANTS: 30 adult participants with symptoms of a common cold, presenting within 48 hours of the onset of symptoms. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive either 35 L/min of 100% humidified air at 41°C via high flow nasal cannulae, 2 hours per day for up to 5 days (rhinothermy), or vitamin C 250 mg daily for 5 days (control). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the proportion of screened candidates who were randomised. Secondary outcomes included: proportion of randomised participants who completed the study; modified Jackson scores from randomisation to 10 days after initiation of randomised regimen; time until feeling ‘a lot better’ compared with study entry; time until resolution of symptoms or symptom score at 10 days postrandomisation; proportion of organisms identified by PCR analysis of nasal swabs taken at baseline; the patterns of use of the rhinothermy device; estimated adherence of the control group; and rhinothermy device tolerability. RESULTS: In all 30/79 (38%, 95% CI 27% to 50%) of potential participants screened for eligibility were randomised. Rhinothermy was well tolerated, and all randomised participants completed the study (100%, 95% CI 88% to 100%). The reduction from baseline in the modified Jackson score was greater with rhinothermy compared with control at days 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, with the maximum difference at day 4 (−6.4, 95% CI −9.4 to −3.3). The substantial clinical benefit threshold for modified Jackson score was a 5-unit change. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that an RCT of rhinothermy compared with low-dose vitamin C in the treatment of the common cold is feasible. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12616000470493; Results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5875674/ /pubmed/29593018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019350 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Respiratory Medicine
van de Hei, Susanne
McKinstry, Steven
Bardsley, George
Weatherall, Mark
Beasley, Richard
Fingleton, James
Randomised controlled trial of rhinothermy for treatment of the common cold: a feasibility study
title Randomised controlled trial of rhinothermy for treatment of the common cold: a feasibility study
title_full Randomised controlled trial of rhinothermy for treatment of the common cold: a feasibility study
title_fullStr Randomised controlled trial of rhinothermy for treatment of the common cold: a feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Randomised controlled trial of rhinothermy for treatment of the common cold: a feasibility study
title_short Randomised controlled trial of rhinothermy for treatment of the common cold: a feasibility study
title_sort randomised controlled trial of rhinothermy for treatment of the common cold: a feasibility study
topic Respiratory Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29593018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019350
work_keys_str_mv AT vandeheisusanne randomisedcontrolledtrialofrhinothermyfortreatmentofthecommoncoldafeasibilitystudy
AT mckinstrysteven randomisedcontrolledtrialofrhinothermyfortreatmentofthecommoncoldafeasibilitystudy
AT bardsleygeorge randomisedcontrolledtrialofrhinothermyfortreatmentofthecommoncoldafeasibilitystudy
AT weatherallmark randomisedcontrolledtrialofrhinothermyfortreatmentofthecommoncoldafeasibilitystudy
AT beasleyrichard randomisedcontrolledtrialofrhinothermyfortreatmentofthecommoncoldafeasibilitystudy
AT fingletonjames randomisedcontrolledtrialofrhinothermyfortreatmentofthecommoncoldafeasibilitystudy