Cargando…

Clinicians’ perspectives on incidentally discovered silent brain infarcts – A qualitative study

BACKGROUND: While silent brain infarcts (SBIs) in screened cohorts are associated with risk of symptomatic stroke and dementia, the clinical significance of incidentally discovered SBIs (id-SBIs) is unknown. Detection may offer an opportunity to initiate prevention measures, but uncertainties about...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leung, Lester Y., Han, Paul K. J., Lundquist, Christine, Weinstein, Gene, Thaler, David E., Kent, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29596459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194971
_version_ 1783310416199286784
author Leung, Lester Y.
Han, Paul K. J.
Lundquist, Christine
Weinstein, Gene
Thaler, David E.
Kent, David
author_facet Leung, Lester Y.
Han, Paul K. J.
Lundquist, Christine
Weinstein, Gene
Thaler, David E.
Kent, David
author_sort Leung, Lester Y.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While silent brain infarcts (SBIs) in screened cohorts are associated with risk of symptomatic stroke and dementia, the clinical significance of incidentally discovered SBIs (id-SBIs) is unknown. Detection may offer an opportunity to initiate prevention measures, but uncertainties about id-SBIs may impede clinicians from addressing them and complicate further study of this condition. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study used semi-structured interviews of practicing clinicians. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a grounded theory approach. A constant comparative method was used to organize emergent themes and examine new themes. Purposeful sampling was employed to achieve participant diversity. Fifteen clinicians were interviewed. Emergent themes centered on uncertainty about id-SBIs, clinical decision making in response to uncertainty, and evidence needed to resolve uncertainty. All clinicians reported uncertainty about id-SBIs: diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutic. Differential responses to uncertainties resulted in practice variation within and between specialties. Diagnostic and prognostic uncertainty discouraged disclosure of imaging findings to patients. Vascular neurologists viewed the prognostic significance of id-SBIs as similar to symptomatic stroke. Therapeutic uncertainty was common, but most participants endorsed using stroke secondary prevention strategies. Regarding future research, all internists indicated they would consider changing practices in response to observational studies, whereas half of the neurologists expressed reluctance to modify practices based on non-randomized data. Several expressed concerns about clinical trial feasibility and lack of equipoise. CONCLUSIONS: id-SBIs are a focus of uncertainty for clinicians, leading to practice variation. Future studies must address diagnostic and prognostic uncertainty to facilitate implementation of prevention strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5875806
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58758062018-04-13 Clinicians’ perspectives on incidentally discovered silent brain infarcts – A qualitative study Leung, Lester Y. Han, Paul K. J. Lundquist, Christine Weinstein, Gene Thaler, David E. Kent, David PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: While silent brain infarcts (SBIs) in screened cohorts are associated with risk of symptomatic stroke and dementia, the clinical significance of incidentally discovered SBIs (id-SBIs) is unknown. Detection may offer an opportunity to initiate prevention measures, but uncertainties about id-SBIs may impede clinicians from addressing them and complicate further study of this condition. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study used semi-structured interviews of practicing clinicians. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a grounded theory approach. A constant comparative method was used to organize emergent themes and examine new themes. Purposeful sampling was employed to achieve participant diversity. Fifteen clinicians were interviewed. Emergent themes centered on uncertainty about id-SBIs, clinical decision making in response to uncertainty, and evidence needed to resolve uncertainty. All clinicians reported uncertainty about id-SBIs: diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutic. Differential responses to uncertainties resulted in practice variation within and between specialties. Diagnostic and prognostic uncertainty discouraged disclosure of imaging findings to patients. Vascular neurologists viewed the prognostic significance of id-SBIs as similar to symptomatic stroke. Therapeutic uncertainty was common, but most participants endorsed using stroke secondary prevention strategies. Regarding future research, all internists indicated they would consider changing practices in response to observational studies, whereas half of the neurologists expressed reluctance to modify practices based on non-randomized data. Several expressed concerns about clinical trial feasibility and lack of equipoise. CONCLUSIONS: id-SBIs are a focus of uncertainty for clinicians, leading to practice variation. Future studies must address diagnostic and prognostic uncertainty to facilitate implementation of prevention strategies. Public Library of Science 2018-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5875806/ /pubmed/29596459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194971 Text en © 2018 Leung et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Leung, Lester Y.
Han, Paul K. J.
Lundquist, Christine
Weinstein, Gene
Thaler, David E.
Kent, David
Clinicians’ perspectives on incidentally discovered silent brain infarcts – A qualitative study
title Clinicians’ perspectives on incidentally discovered silent brain infarcts – A qualitative study
title_full Clinicians’ perspectives on incidentally discovered silent brain infarcts – A qualitative study
title_fullStr Clinicians’ perspectives on incidentally discovered silent brain infarcts – A qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Clinicians’ perspectives on incidentally discovered silent brain infarcts – A qualitative study
title_short Clinicians’ perspectives on incidentally discovered silent brain infarcts – A qualitative study
title_sort clinicians’ perspectives on incidentally discovered silent brain infarcts – a qualitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29596459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194971
work_keys_str_mv AT leunglestery cliniciansperspectivesonincidentallydiscoveredsilentbraininfarctsaqualitativestudy
AT hanpaulkj cliniciansperspectivesonincidentallydiscoveredsilentbraininfarctsaqualitativestudy
AT lundquistchristine cliniciansperspectivesonincidentallydiscoveredsilentbraininfarctsaqualitativestudy
AT weinsteingene cliniciansperspectivesonincidentallydiscoveredsilentbraininfarctsaqualitativestudy
AT thalerdavide cliniciansperspectivesonincidentallydiscoveredsilentbraininfarctsaqualitativestudy
AT kentdavid cliniciansperspectivesonincidentallydiscoveredsilentbraininfarctsaqualitativestudy