Cargando…
Clinicians’ perspectives on incidentally discovered silent brain infarcts – A qualitative study
BACKGROUND: While silent brain infarcts (SBIs) in screened cohorts are associated with risk of symptomatic stroke and dementia, the clinical significance of incidentally discovered SBIs (id-SBIs) is unknown. Detection may offer an opportunity to initiate prevention measures, but uncertainties about...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875806/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29596459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194971 |
_version_ | 1783310416199286784 |
---|---|
author | Leung, Lester Y. Han, Paul K. J. Lundquist, Christine Weinstein, Gene Thaler, David E. Kent, David |
author_facet | Leung, Lester Y. Han, Paul K. J. Lundquist, Christine Weinstein, Gene Thaler, David E. Kent, David |
author_sort | Leung, Lester Y. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: While silent brain infarcts (SBIs) in screened cohorts are associated with risk of symptomatic stroke and dementia, the clinical significance of incidentally discovered SBIs (id-SBIs) is unknown. Detection may offer an opportunity to initiate prevention measures, but uncertainties about id-SBIs may impede clinicians from addressing them and complicate further study of this condition. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study used semi-structured interviews of practicing clinicians. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a grounded theory approach. A constant comparative method was used to organize emergent themes and examine new themes. Purposeful sampling was employed to achieve participant diversity. Fifteen clinicians were interviewed. Emergent themes centered on uncertainty about id-SBIs, clinical decision making in response to uncertainty, and evidence needed to resolve uncertainty. All clinicians reported uncertainty about id-SBIs: diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutic. Differential responses to uncertainties resulted in practice variation within and between specialties. Diagnostic and prognostic uncertainty discouraged disclosure of imaging findings to patients. Vascular neurologists viewed the prognostic significance of id-SBIs as similar to symptomatic stroke. Therapeutic uncertainty was common, but most participants endorsed using stroke secondary prevention strategies. Regarding future research, all internists indicated they would consider changing practices in response to observational studies, whereas half of the neurologists expressed reluctance to modify practices based on non-randomized data. Several expressed concerns about clinical trial feasibility and lack of equipoise. CONCLUSIONS: id-SBIs are a focus of uncertainty for clinicians, leading to practice variation. Future studies must address diagnostic and prognostic uncertainty to facilitate implementation of prevention strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5875806 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58758062018-04-13 Clinicians’ perspectives on incidentally discovered silent brain infarcts – A qualitative study Leung, Lester Y. Han, Paul K. J. Lundquist, Christine Weinstein, Gene Thaler, David E. Kent, David PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: While silent brain infarcts (SBIs) in screened cohorts are associated with risk of symptomatic stroke and dementia, the clinical significance of incidentally discovered SBIs (id-SBIs) is unknown. Detection may offer an opportunity to initiate prevention measures, but uncertainties about id-SBIs may impede clinicians from addressing them and complicate further study of this condition. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study used semi-structured interviews of practicing clinicians. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a grounded theory approach. A constant comparative method was used to organize emergent themes and examine new themes. Purposeful sampling was employed to achieve participant diversity. Fifteen clinicians were interviewed. Emergent themes centered on uncertainty about id-SBIs, clinical decision making in response to uncertainty, and evidence needed to resolve uncertainty. All clinicians reported uncertainty about id-SBIs: diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutic. Differential responses to uncertainties resulted in practice variation within and between specialties. Diagnostic and prognostic uncertainty discouraged disclosure of imaging findings to patients. Vascular neurologists viewed the prognostic significance of id-SBIs as similar to symptomatic stroke. Therapeutic uncertainty was common, but most participants endorsed using stroke secondary prevention strategies. Regarding future research, all internists indicated they would consider changing practices in response to observational studies, whereas half of the neurologists expressed reluctance to modify practices based on non-randomized data. Several expressed concerns about clinical trial feasibility and lack of equipoise. CONCLUSIONS: id-SBIs are a focus of uncertainty for clinicians, leading to practice variation. Future studies must address diagnostic and prognostic uncertainty to facilitate implementation of prevention strategies. Public Library of Science 2018-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5875806/ /pubmed/29596459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194971 Text en © 2018 Leung et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Leung, Lester Y. Han, Paul K. J. Lundquist, Christine Weinstein, Gene Thaler, David E. Kent, David Clinicians’ perspectives on incidentally discovered silent brain infarcts – A qualitative study |
title | Clinicians’ perspectives on incidentally discovered silent brain infarcts – A qualitative study |
title_full | Clinicians’ perspectives on incidentally discovered silent brain infarcts – A qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Clinicians’ perspectives on incidentally discovered silent brain infarcts – A qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinicians’ perspectives on incidentally discovered silent brain infarcts – A qualitative study |
title_short | Clinicians’ perspectives on incidentally discovered silent brain infarcts – A qualitative study |
title_sort | clinicians’ perspectives on incidentally discovered silent brain infarcts – a qualitative study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875806/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29596459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194971 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leunglestery cliniciansperspectivesonincidentallydiscoveredsilentbraininfarctsaqualitativestudy AT hanpaulkj cliniciansperspectivesonincidentallydiscoveredsilentbraininfarctsaqualitativestudy AT lundquistchristine cliniciansperspectivesonincidentallydiscoveredsilentbraininfarctsaqualitativestudy AT weinsteingene cliniciansperspectivesonincidentallydiscoveredsilentbraininfarctsaqualitativestudy AT thalerdavide cliniciansperspectivesonincidentallydiscoveredsilentbraininfarctsaqualitativestudy AT kentdavid cliniciansperspectivesonincidentallydiscoveredsilentbraininfarctsaqualitativestudy |