Cargando…

Do we need a new CT scan for retreatment of intracranial SRS patients?

PURPOSE: To determine if the treatment planning computed tomography scan (CT) from an initial intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment can be used for repeat courses of SRS. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty‐five patients with 40 brain metastases that received multiple courses of SRS were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wiant, David, Manning, Matthew, Koch, Kyle, Maurer, Jacqueline, Hayes, Lane, Liu, Han, Shang, Qingyang, Sintay, Benjamin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28771971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12152
_version_ 1783310420659929088
author Wiant, David
Manning, Matthew
Koch, Kyle
Maurer, Jacqueline
Hayes, Lane
Liu, Han
Shang, Qingyang
Sintay, Benjamin
author_facet Wiant, David
Manning, Matthew
Koch, Kyle
Maurer, Jacqueline
Hayes, Lane
Liu, Han
Shang, Qingyang
Sintay, Benjamin
author_sort Wiant, David
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine if the treatment planning computed tomography scan (CT) from an initial intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment can be used for repeat courses of SRS. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty‐five patients with 40 brain metastases that received multiple courses of SRS were retrospectively studied. Magnetic resonance scans from repeat SRS (rMR) courses were registered to CT scans from the initial SRS (iCT) and repeat SRS (rCT). The CT scans were then registered to find the displacement of the rMR between iCT and rCT registrations. The distance from each target to proximal skull surface was measured in 16 directions on each CT scan after registration. The mutual information (MI) coefficients from the registration process were used to evaluate image set similarity. Targets and plans from the rCTs were transferred to the iCTs, and doses were recalculated on the iCT for repeat plans. The two dose distributions were compared through 3D gamma analysis. RESULTS: The magnitude of the mean linear translations from the MR registrations was 0.6 ± 0.3 mm. The mean differences in distance from target to skull on a per target basis were 0.3 ± 0.2 mm. The MI was 0.582 ± 0.042. Registration between a comparison group of 30 CT scans that had the same data resampled and 30 scans that were intercompared with different patients gave MI = 0.721 ± 0.055 and MI = 0.359 ± 0.031, respectively. The mean gamma passing rates were 0.997 ± 0.007 for 1 mm/1% criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The rMR can be aligned to the iCT to accurately define targets. The skull shows minimal change between scans so the iCT can be used for set‐up at repeat treatments. The dosimetry provided by the iCT dose calculation is adequate for repeat SRS. Treatment based on iCT is feasible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5875825
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58758252018-04-02 Do we need a new CT scan for retreatment of intracranial SRS patients? Wiant, David Manning, Matthew Koch, Kyle Maurer, Jacqueline Hayes, Lane Liu, Han Shang, Qingyang Sintay, Benjamin J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: To determine if the treatment planning computed tomography scan (CT) from an initial intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment can be used for repeat courses of SRS. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty‐five patients with 40 brain metastases that received multiple courses of SRS were retrospectively studied. Magnetic resonance scans from repeat SRS (rMR) courses were registered to CT scans from the initial SRS (iCT) and repeat SRS (rCT). The CT scans were then registered to find the displacement of the rMR between iCT and rCT registrations. The distance from each target to proximal skull surface was measured in 16 directions on each CT scan after registration. The mutual information (MI) coefficients from the registration process were used to evaluate image set similarity. Targets and plans from the rCTs were transferred to the iCTs, and doses were recalculated on the iCT for repeat plans. The two dose distributions were compared through 3D gamma analysis. RESULTS: The magnitude of the mean linear translations from the MR registrations was 0.6 ± 0.3 mm. The mean differences in distance from target to skull on a per target basis were 0.3 ± 0.2 mm. The MI was 0.582 ± 0.042. Registration between a comparison group of 30 CT scans that had the same data resampled and 30 scans that were intercompared with different patients gave MI = 0.721 ± 0.055 and MI = 0.359 ± 0.031, respectively. The mean gamma passing rates were 0.997 ± 0.007 for 1 mm/1% criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The rMR can be aligned to the iCT to accurately define targets. The skull shows minimal change between scans so the iCT can be used for set‐up at repeat treatments. The dosimetry provided by the iCT dose calculation is adequate for repeat SRS. Treatment based on iCT is feasible. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5875825/ /pubmed/28771971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12152 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Wiant, David
Manning, Matthew
Koch, Kyle
Maurer, Jacqueline
Hayes, Lane
Liu, Han
Shang, Qingyang
Sintay, Benjamin
Do we need a new CT scan for retreatment of intracranial SRS patients?
title Do we need a new CT scan for retreatment of intracranial SRS patients?
title_full Do we need a new CT scan for retreatment of intracranial SRS patients?
title_fullStr Do we need a new CT scan for retreatment of intracranial SRS patients?
title_full_unstemmed Do we need a new CT scan for retreatment of intracranial SRS patients?
title_short Do we need a new CT scan for retreatment of intracranial SRS patients?
title_sort do we need a new ct scan for retreatment of intracranial srs patients?
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28771971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12152
work_keys_str_mv AT wiantdavid doweneedanewctscanforretreatmentofintracranialsrspatients
AT manningmatthew doweneedanewctscanforretreatmentofintracranialsrspatients
AT kochkyle doweneedanewctscanforretreatmentofintracranialsrspatients
AT maurerjacqueline doweneedanewctscanforretreatmentofintracranialsrspatients
AT hayeslane doweneedanewctscanforretreatmentofintracranialsrspatients
AT liuhan doweneedanewctscanforretreatmentofintracranialsrspatients
AT shangqingyang doweneedanewctscanforretreatmentofintracranialsrspatients
AT sintaybenjamin doweneedanewctscanforretreatmentofintracranialsrspatients