Cargando…

MRI scanner‐independent specific absorption rate measurements using diffusion coefficients

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to measure specific absorption rate (SAR) during MRI scanning using a human torso phantom through quantification of diffusion coefficients independently of those reported by the scanner software for five 1.5 and 3 T clinical MRI systems from different vendors...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seo, Youngseob, Wang, Zhiyue J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28470956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12095
_version_ 1783310423039148032
author Seo, Youngseob
Wang, Zhiyue J.
author_facet Seo, Youngseob
Wang, Zhiyue J.
author_sort Seo, Youngseob
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to measure specific absorption rate (SAR) during MRI scanning using a human torso phantom through quantification of diffusion coefficients independently of those reported by the scanner software for five 1.5 and 3 T clinical MRI systems from different vendors. METHODS: A quadrature body coil transmitted the RF power and a body array coil received the signals. With diffusion tensor imaging, SAR values for three MRI sequences were measured on the five scanners and compared to the nominal values calculated by the scanners. RESULTS: For the GE 1.5 T MRI system, the MRI scanner‐reported SAR value was 1.58 W kg(‐1) and the measured SAR value was 1.38 W kg(‐1). For the Philips 1.5 T MRI scanner, the MRI system‐reported SAR value was 1.48 W kg(‐1) and the measured value was 1.39 W kg(‐1). For the Siemens 3 T MRI system, the reported SAR value was 2.5 W kg(‐1) and the measured SAR value was 1.96 W kg(‐1). For two Philips 3 T MRI scanners, the reported SAR values were 1.5 W kg(‐1) and the measured values were 1.94 and 1.96 W kg(‐1). The percentage differences between the measured and reported SAR values on the GE 1.5 T, Philips 1.5 T, Siemens 3 T, and Philips 3 T were 13.5, 6.3, 24.2, 25.6, and 26.6% respectively. CONCLUSION: The scanner‐independent SAR measurements using diffusion coefficients described in this study can play a significant role in estimating accurate SAR values as a standardized method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5875836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58758362018-04-02 MRI scanner‐independent specific absorption rate measurements using diffusion coefficients Seo, Youngseob Wang, Zhiyue J. J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to measure specific absorption rate (SAR) during MRI scanning using a human torso phantom through quantification of diffusion coefficients independently of those reported by the scanner software for five 1.5 and 3 T clinical MRI systems from different vendors. METHODS: A quadrature body coil transmitted the RF power and a body array coil received the signals. With diffusion tensor imaging, SAR values for three MRI sequences were measured on the five scanners and compared to the nominal values calculated by the scanners. RESULTS: For the GE 1.5 T MRI system, the MRI scanner‐reported SAR value was 1.58 W kg(‐1) and the measured SAR value was 1.38 W kg(‐1). For the Philips 1.5 T MRI scanner, the MRI system‐reported SAR value was 1.48 W kg(‐1) and the measured value was 1.39 W kg(‐1). For the Siemens 3 T MRI system, the reported SAR value was 2.5 W kg(‐1) and the measured SAR value was 1.96 W kg(‐1). For two Philips 3 T MRI scanners, the reported SAR values were 1.5 W kg(‐1) and the measured values were 1.94 and 1.96 W kg(‐1). The percentage differences between the measured and reported SAR values on the GE 1.5 T, Philips 1.5 T, Siemens 3 T, and Philips 3 T were 13.5, 6.3, 24.2, 25.6, and 26.6% respectively. CONCLUSION: The scanner‐independent SAR measurements using diffusion coefficients described in this study can play a significant role in estimating accurate SAR values as a standardized method. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5875836/ /pubmed/28470956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12095 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Medical Imaging
Seo, Youngseob
Wang, Zhiyue J.
MRI scanner‐independent specific absorption rate measurements using diffusion coefficients
title MRI scanner‐independent specific absorption rate measurements using diffusion coefficients
title_full MRI scanner‐independent specific absorption rate measurements using diffusion coefficients
title_fullStr MRI scanner‐independent specific absorption rate measurements using diffusion coefficients
title_full_unstemmed MRI scanner‐independent specific absorption rate measurements using diffusion coefficients
title_short MRI scanner‐independent specific absorption rate measurements using diffusion coefficients
title_sort mri scanner‐independent specific absorption rate measurements using diffusion coefficients
topic Medical Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28470956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12095
work_keys_str_mv AT seoyoungseob mriscannerindependentspecificabsorptionratemeasurementsusingdiffusioncoefficients
AT wangzhiyuej mriscannerindependentspecificabsorptionratemeasurementsusingdiffusioncoefficients