Cargando…

Colon cleansing protocol in children: research conditions vs. clinical practice

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS:  Colon preparation rates are the limiting factor for a successful diagnostic colonoscopy in children. Different colon cleansing protocols have been published for use in children. Unfortunately, the applicability of those published research protocols has not been formally e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elitsur, Yoram, Balfaqih, Yaslam, Preston, Deborah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5876023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29607392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-121985
_version_ 1783310449472700416
author Elitsur, Yoram
Balfaqih, Yaslam
Preston, Deborah
author_facet Elitsur, Yoram
Balfaqih, Yaslam
Preston, Deborah
author_sort Elitsur, Yoram
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS:  Colon preparation rates are the limiting factor for a successful diagnostic colonoscopy in children. Different colon cleansing protocols have been published for use in children. Unfortunately, the applicability of those published research protocols has not been formally evaluated in routine clinical practice. We investigated the success rate of our previously published colon cleansing protocol as utilized in our clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS:  This was a retrospective study. In the clinical practice, the colon cleansing protocol included PEG-3350 at a dose of 2 g/kg/day plus Dulcolax (Bisacodyl, Boehringer Ingelheim, TX USA) 5 mg/day for 2 days. Adequate colon preparation was graded between 1 – 5, as previously described, and grade ≥ 4.0 was considered an adequate preparation. Patients were instructed to complete a questionnaire that included PEG-3350 dose, number of stools per day, consistency of each stool, and side effects (vomiting, abdominal pain). Clinical and endoscopic results were compared between the protocol under research conditions and routine practice. RESULTS:  The success rate of the colon preparation in our clinical practice was similar to the results observed under our research protocol (75 % vs. 73.6 %). Moreover, the total number of stools, stool consistency, and the intubation rate of the terminal ileum were also similar. We concluded, that in our experience, the colon cleansing protocol used under research conditions was effective and appropriate for use in routine clinical practice. CONCLUSION:  We recommend testing each new protocol under the routine conditions of clinical practice to confirm its applicability for general practitioners.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5876023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58760232018-04-01 Colon cleansing protocol in children: research conditions vs. clinical practice Elitsur, Yoram Balfaqih, Yaslam Preston, Deborah Endosc Int Open BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS:  Colon preparation rates are the limiting factor for a successful diagnostic colonoscopy in children. Different colon cleansing protocols have been published for use in children. Unfortunately, the applicability of those published research protocols has not been formally evaluated in routine clinical practice. We investigated the success rate of our previously published colon cleansing protocol as utilized in our clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS:  This was a retrospective study. In the clinical practice, the colon cleansing protocol included PEG-3350 at a dose of 2 g/kg/day plus Dulcolax (Bisacodyl, Boehringer Ingelheim, TX USA) 5 mg/day for 2 days. Adequate colon preparation was graded between 1 – 5, as previously described, and grade ≥ 4.0 was considered an adequate preparation. Patients were instructed to complete a questionnaire that included PEG-3350 dose, number of stools per day, consistency of each stool, and side effects (vomiting, abdominal pain). Clinical and endoscopic results were compared between the protocol under research conditions and routine practice. RESULTS:  The success rate of the colon preparation in our clinical practice was similar to the results observed under our research protocol (75 % vs. 73.6 %). Moreover, the total number of stools, stool consistency, and the intubation rate of the terminal ileum were also similar. We concluded, that in our experience, the colon cleansing protocol used under research conditions was effective and appropriate for use in routine clinical practice. CONCLUSION:  We recommend testing each new protocol under the routine conditions of clinical practice to confirm its applicability for general practitioners. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018-04 2018-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5876023/ /pubmed/29607392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-121985 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Elitsur, Yoram
Balfaqih, Yaslam
Preston, Deborah
Colon cleansing protocol in children: research conditions vs. clinical practice
title Colon cleansing protocol in children: research conditions vs. clinical practice
title_full Colon cleansing protocol in children: research conditions vs. clinical practice
title_fullStr Colon cleansing protocol in children: research conditions vs. clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed Colon cleansing protocol in children: research conditions vs. clinical practice
title_short Colon cleansing protocol in children: research conditions vs. clinical practice
title_sort colon cleansing protocol in children: research conditions vs. clinical practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5876023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29607392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-121985
work_keys_str_mv AT elitsuryoram coloncleansingprotocolinchildrenresearchconditionsvsclinicalpractice
AT balfaqihyaslam coloncleansingprotocolinchildrenresearchconditionsvsclinicalpractice
AT prestondeborah coloncleansingprotocolinchildrenresearchconditionsvsclinicalpractice