Cargando…

Longitudinal Follow-up of Impedance Drift in Deep Brain Stimulation Cases

BACKGROUND: Impedance is an integral property of neuromodulation devices that determines the current delivered to brain tissue. Long-term variability in therapeutic impedance following deep brain stimulation (DBS) has not been extensively investigated across different brain targets. The aim was to e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wong, Joshua, Gunduz, Aysegul, Shute, Jonathan, Eisinger, Robert, Cernera, Stephanie, Ho, Kwo Wei David, Martinez-Ramirez, Daniel, Almeida, Leonardo, Wilson, Christina A., Okun, Michael S., Hess, Christopher W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Columbia University Libraries/Information Services 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5876470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29607241
http://dx.doi.org/10.7916/D8M62XTC
_version_ 1783310516758773760
author Wong, Joshua
Gunduz, Aysegul
Shute, Jonathan
Eisinger, Robert
Cernera, Stephanie
Ho, Kwo Wei David
Martinez-Ramirez, Daniel
Almeida, Leonardo
Wilson, Christina A.
Okun, Michael S.
Hess, Christopher W.
author_facet Wong, Joshua
Gunduz, Aysegul
Shute, Jonathan
Eisinger, Robert
Cernera, Stephanie
Ho, Kwo Wei David
Martinez-Ramirez, Daniel
Almeida, Leonardo
Wilson, Christina A.
Okun, Michael S.
Hess, Christopher W.
author_sort Wong, Joshua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Impedance is an integral property of neuromodulation devices that determines the current delivered to brain tissue. Long-term variability in therapeutic impedance following deep brain stimulation (DBS) has not been extensively investigated across different brain targets. The aim was to evaluate DBS impedance drift and variability over an extended postoperative period across common DBS targets. METHODS: Retrospective data from 1,764 electrode leads were included and drawn from 866 DBS patients enrolled in the University of Florida Institutional Review Board-approved INFORM database and analyzed up to 84 months post implantation. An exploratory analysis was conducted to identify trends in impedances using a Mann–Kendall test of trend. RESULTS: There were 866 patients and 1,764 leads available for analysis. The majority of subjects had Parkinson’s disease (60.7%). The mean age at implantation was 58.7 years old and the mean follow-up time was 36.8 months. There were significant fluctuations in the mean impedance of all electrodes analyzed that largely stabilized by 6 months except for the subthalamic nucleus (STN) target, in which fluctuations persisted throughout the duration of follow-up with a continued downward trend (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: The drift in impedance observed primarily within the first 6 months is in keeping with prior studies and is likely due to surgical micro-lesioning effects and brain parenchyma remodeling at the electrode–tissue interface, typically at values approximating 1,000 Ω. The differences in impedance trends over time in the various DBS targets may be due to underlying differences in structure and tissue composition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5876470
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Columbia University Libraries/Information Services
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58764702018-03-30 Longitudinal Follow-up of Impedance Drift in Deep Brain Stimulation Cases Wong, Joshua Gunduz, Aysegul Shute, Jonathan Eisinger, Robert Cernera, Stephanie Ho, Kwo Wei David Martinez-Ramirez, Daniel Almeida, Leonardo Wilson, Christina A. Okun, Michael S. Hess, Christopher W. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) Articles BACKGROUND: Impedance is an integral property of neuromodulation devices that determines the current delivered to brain tissue. Long-term variability in therapeutic impedance following deep brain stimulation (DBS) has not been extensively investigated across different brain targets. The aim was to evaluate DBS impedance drift and variability over an extended postoperative period across common DBS targets. METHODS: Retrospective data from 1,764 electrode leads were included and drawn from 866 DBS patients enrolled in the University of Florida Institutional Review Board-approved INFORM database and analyzed up to 84 months post implantation. An exploratory analysis was conducted to identify trends in impedances using a Mann–Kendall test of trend. RESULTS: There were 866 patients and 1,764 leads available for analysis. The majority of subjects had Parkinson’s disease (60.7%). The mean age at implantation was 58.7 years old and the mean follow-up time was 36.8 months. There were significant fluctuations in the mean impedance of all electrodes analyzed that largely stabilized by 6 months except for the subthalamic nucleus (STN) target, in which fluctuations persisted throughout the duration of follow-up with a continued downward trend (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: The drift in impedance observed primarily within the first 6 months is in keeping with prior studies and is likely due to surgical micro-lesioning effects and brain parenchyma remodeling at the electrode–tissue interface, typically at values approximating 1,000 Ω. The differences in impedance trends over time in the various DBS targets may be due to underlying differences in structure and tissue composition. Columbia University Libraries/Information Services 2018-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5876470/ /pubmed/29607241 http://dx.doi.org/10.7916/D8M62XTC Text en © 2018 Wong et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–Noncommerical–No Derivatives License, which permits the user to copy, distribute, and transmit the work provided that the original author and source are credited; that no commercial use is made of the work; and that the work is not altered or transformed.
spellingShingle Articles
Wong, Joshua
Gunduz, Aysegul
Shute, Jonathan
Eisinger, Robert
Cernera, Stephanie
Ho, Kwo Wei David
Martinez-Ramirez, Daniel
Almeida, Leonardo
Wilson, Christina A.
Okun, Michael S.
Hess, Christopher W.
Longitudinal Follow-up of Impedance Drift in Deep Brain Stimulation Cases
title Longitudinal Follow-up of Impedance Drift in Deep Brain Stimulation Cases
title_full Longitudinal Follow-up of Impedance Drift in Deep Brain Stimulation Cases
title_fullStr Longitudinal Follow-up of Impedance Drift in Deep Brain Stimulation Cases
title_full_unstemmed Longitudinal Follow-up of Impedance Drift in Deep Brain Stimulation Cases
title_short Longitudinal Follow-up of Impedance Drift in Deep Brain Stimulation Cases
title_sort longitudinal follow-up of impedance drift in deep brain stimulation cases
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5876470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29607241
http://dx.doi.org/10.7916/D8M62XTC
work_keys_str_mv AT wongjoshua longitudinalfollowupofimpedancedriftindeepbrainstimulationcases
AT gunduzaysegul longitudinalfollowupofimpedancedriftindeepbrainstimulationcases
AT shutejonathan longitudinalfollowupofimpedancedriftindeepbrainstimulationcases
AT eisingerrobert longitudinalfollowupofimpedancedriftindeepbrainstimulationcases
AT cernerastephanie longitudinalfollowupofimpedancedriftindeepbrainstimulationcases
AT hokwoweidavid longitudinalfollowupofimpedancedriftindeepbrainstimulationcases
AT martinezramirezdaniel longitudinalfollowupofimpedancedriftindeepbrainstimulationcases
AT almeidaleonardo longitudinalfollowupofimpedancedriftindeepbrainstimulationcases
AT wilsonchristinaa longitudinalfollowupofimpedancedriftindeepbrainstimulationcases
AT okunmichaels longitudinalfollowupofimpedancedriftindeepbrainstimulationcases
AT hesschristopherw longitudinalfollowupofimpedancedriftindeepbrainstimulationcases