Cargando…
Longitudinal Follow-up of Impedance Drift in Deep Brain Stimulation Cases
BACKGROUND: Impedance is an integral property of neuromodulation devices that determines the current delivered to brain tissue. Long-term variability in therapeutic impedance following deep brain stimulation (DBS) has not been extensively investigated across different brain targets. The aim was to e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Columbia University Libraries/Information Services
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5876470/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29607241 http://dx.doi.org/10.7916/D8M62XTC |
_version_ | 1783310516758773760 |
---|---|
author | Wong, Joshua Gunduz, Aysegul Shute, Jonathan Eisinger, Robert Cernera, Stephanie Ho, Kwo Wei David Martinez-Ramirez, Daniel Almeida, Leonardo Wilson, Christina A. Okun, Michael S. Hess, Christopher W. |
author_facet | Wong, Joshua Gunduz, Aysegul Shute, Jonathan Eisinger, Robert Cernera, Stephanie Ho, Kwo Wei David Martinez-Ramirez, Daniel Almeida, Leonardo Wilson, Christina A. Okun, Michael S. Hess, Christopher W. |
author_sort | Wong, Joshua |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Impedance is an integral property of neuromodulation devices that determines the current delivered to brain tissue. Long-term variability in therapeutic impedance following deep brain stimulation (DBS) has not been extensively investigated across different brain targets. The aim was to evaluate DBS impedance drift and variability over an extended postoperative period across common DBS targets. METHODS: Retrospective data from 1,764 electrode leads were included and drawn from 866 DBS patients enrolled in the University of Florida Institutional Review Board-approved INFORM database and analyzed up to 84 months post implantation. An exploratory analysis was conducted to identify trends in impedances using a Mann–Kendall test of trend. RESULTS: There were 866 patients and 1,764 leads available for analysis. The majority of subjects had Parkinson’s disease (60.7%). The mean age at implantation was 58.7 years old and the mean follow-up time was 36.8 months. There were significant fluctuations in the mean impedance of all electrodes analyzed that largely stabilized by 6 months except for the subthalamic nucleus (STN) target, in which fluctuations persisted throughout the duration of follow-up with a continued downward trend (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: The drift in impedance observed primarily within the first 6 months is in keeping with prior studies and is likely due to surgical micro-lesioning effects and brain parenchyma remodeling at the electrode–tissue interface, typically at values approximating 1,000 Ω. The differences in impedance trends over time in the various DBS targets may be due to underlying differences in structure and tissue composition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5876470 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Columbia University Libraries/Information Services |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58764702018-03-30 Longitudinal Follow-up of Impedance Drift in Deep Brain Stimulation Cases Wong, Joshua Gunduz, Aysegul Shute, Jonathan Eisinger, Robert Cernera, Stephanie Ho, Kwo Wei David Martinez-Ramirez, Daniel Almeida, Leonardo Wilson, Christina A. Okun, Michael S. Hess, Christopher W. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) Articles BACKGROUND: Impedance is an integral property of neuromodulation devices that determines the current delivered to brain tissue. Long-term variability in therapeutic impedance following deep brain stimulation (DBS) has not been extensively investigated across different brain targets. The aim was to evaluate DBS impedance drift and variability over an extended postoperative period across common DBS targets. METHODS: Retrospective data from 1,764 electrode leads were included and drawn from 866 DBS patients enrolled in the University of Florida Institutional Review Board-approved INFORM database and analyzed up to 84 months post implantation. An exploratory analysis was conducted to identify trends in impedances using a Mann–Kendall test of trend. RESULTS: There were 866 patients and 1,764 leads available for analysis. The majority of subjects had Parkinson’s disease (60.7%). The mean age at implantation was 58.7 years old and the mean follow-up time was 36.8 months. There were significant fluctuations in the mean impedance of all electrodes analyzed that largely stabilized by 6 months except for the subthalamic nucleus (STN) target, in which fluctuations persisted throughout the duration of follow-up with a continued downward trend (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: The drift in impedance observed primarily within the first 6 months is in keeping with prior studies and is likely due to surgical micro-lesioning effects and brain parenchyma remodeling at the electrode–tissue interface, typically at values approximating 1,000 Ω. The differences in impedance trends over time in the various DBS targets may be due to underlying differences in structure and tissue composition. Columbia University Libraries/Information Services 2018-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5876470/ /pubmed/29607241 http://dx.doi.org/10.7916/D8M62XTC Text en © 2018 Wong et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–Noncommerical–No Derivatives License, which permits the user to copy, distribute, and transmit the work provided that the original author and source are credited; that no commercial use is made of the work; and that the work is not altered or transformed. |
spellingShingle | Articles Wong, Joshua Gunduz, Aysegul Shute, Jonathan Eisinger, Robert Cernera, Stephanie Ho, Kwo Wei David Martinez-Ramirez, Daniel Almeida, Leonardo Wilson, Christina A. Okun, Michael S. Hess, Christopher W. Longitudinal Follow-up of Impedance Drift in Deep Brain Stimulation Cases |
title | Longitudinal Follow-up of Impedance Drift in Deep Brain Stimulation Cases |
title_full | Longitudinal Follow-up of Impedance Drift in Deep Brain Stimulation Cases |
title_fullStr | Longitudinal Follow-up of Impedance Drift in Deep Brain Stimulation Cases |
title_full_unstemmed | Longitudinal Follow-up of Impedance Drift in Deep Brain Stimulation Cases |
title_short | Longitudinal Follow-up of Impedance Drift in Deep Brain Stimulation Cases |
title_sort | longitudinal follow-up of impedance drift in deep brain stimulation cases |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5876470/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29607241 http://dx.doi.org/10.7916/D8M62XTC |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wongjoshua longitudinalfollowupofimpedancedriftindeepbrainstimulationcases AT gunduzaysegul longitudinalfollowupofimpedancedriftindeepbrainstimulationcases AT shutejonathan longitudinalfollowupofimpedancedriftindeepbrainstimulationcases AT eisingerrobert longitudinalfollowupofimpedancedriftindeepbrainstimulationcases AT cernerastephanie longitudinalfollowupofimpedancedriftindeepbrainstimulationcases AT hokwoweidavid longitudinalfollowupofimpedancedriftindeepbrainstimulationcases AT martinezramirezdaniel longitudinalfollowupofimpedancedriftindeepbrainstimulationcases AT almeidaleonardo longitudinalfollowupofimpedancedriftindeepbrainstimulationcases AT wilsonchristinaa longitudinalfollowupofimpedancedriftindeepbrainstimulationcases AT okunmichaels longitudinalfollowupofimpedancedriftindeepbrainstimulationcases AT hesschristopherw longitudinalfollowupofimpedancedriftindeepbrainstimulationcases |