Cargando…

Comparison of postnatal catch-up growth according to definitions of small for gestational age infants

PURPOSE: Small for gestational age (SGA) is confusingly defined as birth weight (BW) either below 3rd percentile or 10th percentile for infants. This study aimed to compare postnatal catch-up growth between SGA groups according to different definitions. METHODS: Data of 129 infants born with BW belo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huh, Jisun, Kwon, Ji Yoon, Kim, Hye Ryun, Lee, Eun Hee, Rhie, Young-Jun, Choi, Byung Min, Lee, Kee-Hyoung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Pediatric Society 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5876507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29628966
http://dx.doi.org/10.3345/kjp.2018.61.3.71
_version_ 1783310523543060480
author Huh, Jisun
Kwon, Ji Yoon
Kim, Hye Ryun
Lee, Eun Hee
Rhie, Young-Jun
Choi, Byung Min
Lee, Kee-Hyoung
author_facet Huh, Jisun
Kwon, Ji Yoon
Kim, Hye Ryun
Lee, Eun Hee
Rhie, Young-Jun
Choi, Byung Min
Lee, Kee-Hyoung
author_sort Huh, Jisun
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Small for gestational age (SGA) is confusingly defined as birth weight (BW) either below 3rd percentile or 10th percentile for infants. This study aimed to compare postnatal catch-up growth between SGA groups according to different definitions. METHODS: Data of 129 infants born with BW below the 10th percentile and admitted to Korea University Anam Hospital and Ansan Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Height and weight were measured at 6, 12, and 24 months. Results were compared between group A (BW: <3rd percentile) and group B (BW: 3rd–10th percentile). RESULTS: Group A included 66 infants and group B included 63. At age 6 months (n=122), 62.9% of group A and 71.7% (P=0.303) of group B showed catch-up growth in weight. At 6 months (n=69), 55.9% of group A and 80.0% of group B (P<0.05) showed catch-up growth in height. At 12 months (n=106), 58.5% of group A, and 75.5% (P=0.062) of group B showed catch-up growth in weight. At 12 months (n=75), 52.8% of group A and 64.1% of group B (P=0.320) showed catch-up growth in height. Up to age 24 months, 66.7%/80.0% in group A and 63.6%/80.0% in group B showed catch-up growth in weight/height. CONCLUSION: Despite different definitions, there were no significant differences between the two SGA groups in postnatal catch-up growth up to age 24 months, except for height at 6 months. Compared to infants with appropriate catch-up growth, low gestational age and BW were risk factors for failed catch-up growth at 6 months.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5876507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Korean Pediatric Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58765072018-04-06 Comparison of postnatal catch-up growth according to definitions of small for gestational age infants Huh, Jisun Kwon, Ji Yoon Kim, Hye Ryun Lee, Eun Hee Rhie, Young-Jun Choi, Byung Min Lee, Kee-Hyoung Korean J Pediatr Original Article PURPOSE: Small for gestational age (SGA) is confusingly defined as birth weight (BW) either below 3rd percentile or 10th percentile for infants. This study aimed to compare postnatal catch-up growth between SGA groups according to different definitions. METHODS: Data of 129 infants born with BW below the 10th percentile and admitted to Korea University Anam Hospital and Ansan Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Height and weight were measured at 6, 12, and 24 months. Results were compared between group A (BW: <3rd percentile) and group B (BW: 3rd–10th percentile). RESULTS: Group A included 66 infants and group B included 63. At age 6 months (n=122), 62.9% of group A and 71.7% (P=0.303) of group B showed catch-up growth in weight. At 6 months (n=69), 55.9% of group A and 80.0% of group B (P<0.05) showed catch-up growth in height. At 12 months (n=106), 58.5% of group A, and 75.5% (P=0.062) of group B showed catch-up growth in weight. At 12 months (n=75), 52.8% of group A and 64.1% of group B (P=0.320) showed catch-up growth in height. Up to age 24 months, 66.7%/80.0% in group A and 63.6%/80.0% in group B showed catch-up growth in weight/height. CONCLUSION: Despite different definitions, there were no significant differences between the two SGA groups in postnatal catch-up growth up to age 24 months, except for height at 6 months. Compared to infants with appropriate catch-up growth, low gestational age and BW were risk factors for failed catch-up growth at 6 months. The Korean Pediatric Society 2018-03 2018-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5876507/ /pubmed/29628966 http://dx.doi.org/10.3345/kjp.2018.61.3.71 Text en Copyright © 2018 by The Korean Pediatric Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Huh, Jisun
Kwon, Ji Yoon
Kim, Hye Ryun
Lee, Eun Hee
Rhie, Young-Jun
Choi, Byung Min
Lee, Kee-Hyoung
Comparison of postnatal catch-up growth according to definitions of small for gestational age infants
title Comparison of postnatal catch-up growth according to definitions of small for gestational age infants
title_full Comparison of postnatal catch-up growth according to definitions of small for gestational age infants
title_fullStr Comparison of postnatal catch-up growth according to definitions of small for gestational age infants
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of postnatal catch-up growth according to definitions of small for gestational age infants
title_short Comparison of postnatal catch-up growth according to definitions of small for gestational age infants
title_sort comparison of postnatal catch-up growth according to definitions of small for gestational age infants
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5876507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29628966
http://dx.doi.org/10.3345/kjp.2018.61.3.71
work_keys_str_mv AT huhjisun comparisonofpostnatalcatchupgrowthaccordingtodefinitionsofsmallforgestationalageinfants
AT kwonjiyoon comparisonofpostnatalcatchupgrowthaccordingtodefinitionsofsmallforgestationalageinfants
AT kimhyeryun comparisonofpostnatalcatchupgrowthaccordingtodefinitionsofsmallforgestationalageinfants
AT leeeunhee comparisonofpostnatalcatchupgrowthaccordingtodefinitionsofsmallforgestationalageinfants
AT rhieyoungjun comparisonofpostnatalcatchupgrowthaccordingtodefinitionsofsmallforgestationalageinfants
AT choibyungmin comparisonofpostnatalcatchupgrowthaccordingtodefinitionsofsmallforgestationalageinfants
AT leekeehyoung comparisonofpostnatalcatchupgrowthaccordingtodefinitionsofsmallforgestationalageinfants