Cargando…

Survival is influenced by approaches to local treatment of Ewing sarcoma within an international randomised controlled trial: analysis of EICESS-92

BACKGROUND: Two national clinical trial groups, United Kingdom Children’s Cancer and Leukaemia Group (CCLG) and the German Paediatric Oncology and Haematology Group (GPOH) together undertook a randomised trial, EICESS-92, which addressed chemotherapy options for Ewing’s sarcoma. We sought the causes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whelan, Jeremy, Hackshaw, Allan, McTiernan, Anne, Grimer, Robert, Spooner, David, Bate, Jessica, Ranft, Andreas, Paulussen, Michael, Juergens, Herbert, Craft, Alan, Lewis, Ian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5877389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29610659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13569-018-0093-y
_version_ 1783310692090118144
author Whelan, Jeremy
Hackshaw, Allan
McTiernan, Anne
Grimer, Robert
Spooner, David
Bate, Jessica
Ranft, Andreas
Paulussen, Michael
Juergens, Herbert
Craft, Alan
Lewis, Ian
author_facet Whelan, Jeremy
Hackshaw, Allan
McTiernan, Anne
Grimer, Robert
Spooner, David
Bate, Jessica
Ranft, Andreas
Paulussen, Michael
Juergens, Herbert
Craft, Alan
Lewis, Ian
author_sort Whelan, Jeremy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Two national clinical trial groups, United Kingdom Children’s Cancer and Leukaemia Group (CCLG) and the German Paediatric Oncology and Haematology Group (GPOH) together undertook a randomised trial, EICESS-92, which addressed chemotherapy options for Ewing’s sarcoma. We sought the causes of unexpected survival differences between the study groups. METHODS: 647 patients were randomised. Cox regression analyses were used to compare event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) between the two study groups. RESULTS: 5-year EFS rates were 43% (95% CI 36–50%) and 57% (95% CI 52–62) in the CCLG and GPOH patients, respectively; corresponding 5-year OS rates were 52% (95% CI 45–59%) and 66% (95% CI 61–71). CCLG patients were less likely to have both surgery and radiotherapy (18 vs. 59%), and more likely to have a single local therapy modality compared to the GPOH patients (72 vs. 35%). Forty-five percent of GPOH patients had pre-operative radiotherapy compared to 3% of CCLG patients. In the CCLG group local recurrence (either with or without metastases) was the first event in 22% of patients compared with 7% in the GPOH group. After allowing for the effects of age, metastases, primary site, histology and local treatment modality, the risk of an EFS event was 44% greater in the CCLG cohort (95% CI 10–89%, p = 0.009), and the risk of dying was 30% greater, but not statistically significant (95% CI 3–74%, p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Unexpected differences in EFS and OS occurred between two patient cohorts recruited within an international randomised trial. Failure to select or deliver appropriate local treatment modalities for Ewing’s sarcoma may compromise chances of cure. Trial registration Supported by Deutsche Krebshilfe (Grants No. DKH M43/92/Jü2 and DKH 70-2551 Jü3), and European Union Biomedicine and Health Programme (Grants No. BMH1-CT92-1341 and BMH4-983956), and Cancer Research United Kingdom. Clinical trial information can be found for the following: NCT0000251
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5877389
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58773892018-04-02 Survival is influenced by approaches to local treatment of Ewing sarcoma within an international randomised controlled trial: analysis of EICESS-92 Whelan, Jeremy Hackshaw, Allan McTiernan, Anne Grimer, Robert Spooner, David Bate, Jessica Ranft, Andreas Paulussen, Michael Juergens, Herbert Craft, Alan Lewis, Ian Clin Sarcoma Res Research BACKGROUND: Two national clinical trial groups, United Kingdom Children’s Cancer and Leukaemia Group (CCLG) and the German Paediatric Oncology and Haematology Group (GPOH) together undertook a randomised trial, EICESS-92, which addressed chemotherapy options for Ewing’s sarcoma. We sought the causes of unexpected survival differences between the study groups. METHODS: 647 patients were randomised. Cox regression analyses were used to compare event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) between the two study groups. RESULTS: 5-year EFS rates were 43% (95% CI 36–50%) and 57% (95% CI 52–62) in the CCLG and GPOH patients, respectively; corresponding 5-year OS rates were 52% (95% CI 45–59%) and 66% (95% CI 61–71). CCLG patients were less likely to have both surgery and radiotherapy (18 vs. 59%), and more likely to have a single local therapy modality compared to the GPOH patients (72 vs. 35%). Forty-five percent of GPOH patients had pre-operative radiotherapy compared to 3% of CCLG patients. In the CCLG group local recurrence (either with or without metastases) was the first event in 22% of patients compared with 7% in the GPOH group. After allowing for the effects of age, metastases, primary site, histology and local treatment modality, the risk of an EFS event was 44% greater in the CCLG cohort (95% CI 10–89%, p = 0.009), and the risk of dying was 30% greater, but not statistically significant (95% CI 3–74%, p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Unexpected differences in EFS and OS occurred between two patient cohorts recruited within an international randomised trial. Failure to select or deliver appropriate local treatment modalities for Ewing’s sarcoma may compromise chances of cure. Trial registration Supported by Deutsche Krebshilfe (Grants No. DKH M43/92/Jü2 and DKH 70-2551 Jü3), and European Union Biomedicine and Health Programme (Grants No. BMH1-CT92-1341 and BMH4-983956), and Cancer Research United Kingdom. Clinical trial information can be found for the following: NCT0000251 BioMed Central 2018-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5877389/ /pubmed/29610659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13569-018-0093-y Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Whelan, Jeremy
Hackshaw, Allan
McTiernan, Anne
Grimer, Robert
Spooner, David
Bate, Jessica
Ranft, Andreas
Paulussen, Michael
Juergens, Herbert
Craft, Alan
Lewis, Ian
Survival is influenced by approaches to local treatment of Ewing sarcoma within an international randomised controlled trial: analysis of EICESS-92
title Survival is influenced by approaches to local treatment of Ewing sarcoma within an international randomised controlled trial: analysis of EICESS-92
title_full Survival is influenced by approaches to local treatment of Ewing sarcoma within an international randomised controlled trial: analysis of EICESS-92
title_fullStr Survival is influenced by approaches to local treatment of Ewing sarcoma within an international randomised controlled trial: analysis of EICESS-92
title_full_unstemmed Survival is influenced by approaches to local treatment of Ewing sarcoma within an international randomised controlled trial: analysis of EICESS-92
title_short Survival is influenced by approaches to local treatment of Ewing sarcoma within an international randomised controlled trial: analysis of EICESS-92
title_sort survival is influenced by approaches to local treatment of ewing sarcoma within an international randomised controlled trial: analysis of eicess-92
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5877389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29610659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13569-018-0093-y
work_keys_str_mv AT whelanjeremy survivalisinfluencedbyapproachestolocaltreatmentofewingsarcomawithinaninternationalrandomisedcontrolledtrialanalysisofeicess92
AT hackshawallan survivalisinfluencedbyapproachestolocaltreatmentofewingsarcomawithinaninternationalrandomisedcontrolledtrialanalysisofeicess92
AT mctiernananne survivalisinfluencedbyapproachestolocaltreatmentofewingsarcomawithinaninternationalrandomisedcontrolledtrialanalysisofeicess92
AT grimerrobert survivalisinfluencedbyapproachestolocaltreatmentofewingsarcomawithinaninternationalrandomisedcontrolledtrialanalysisofeicess92
AT spoonerdavid survivalisinfluencedbyapproachestolocaltreatmentofewingsarcomawithinaninternationalrandomisedcontrolledtrialanalysisofeicess92
AT batejessica survivalisinfluencedbyapproachestolocaltreatmentofewingsarcomawithinaninternationalrandomisedcontrolledtrialanalysisofeicess92
AT ranftandreas survivalisinfluencedbyapproachestolocaltreatmentofewingsarcomawithinaninternationalrandomisedcontrolledtrialanalysisofeicess92
AT paulussenmichael survivalisinfluencedbyapproachestolocaltreatmentofewingsarcomawithinaninternationalrandomisedcontrolledtrialanalysisofeicess92
AT juergensherbert survivalisinfluencedbyapproachestolocaltreatmentofewingsarcomawithinaninternationalrandomisedcontrolledtrialanalysisofeicess92
AT craftalan survivalisinfluencedbyapproachestolocaltreatmentofewingsarcomawithinaninternationalrandomisedcontrolledtrialanalysisofeicess92
AT lewisian survivalisinfluencedbyapproachestolocaltreatmentofewingsarcomawithinaninternationalrandomisedcontrolledtrialanalysisofeicess92