Cargando…

Infectious bursal disease virus inoculation infection modifies Campylobacter jejuni–host interaction in broilers

BACKGROUND: Campylobacter jejuni is considered as a chicken commensal. The gut microbiota and the immune status of the host may affect its colonization. Infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) is an immunosuppressive virus of chickens, which allows secondary pathogens to invade or exacerbates their p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Li, Pielsticker, Colin, Han, Zifeng, Kubasová, Tereza, Rychlik, Ivan, Kaspers, Bernd, Rautenschlein, Silke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5877392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29610580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13099-018-0241-1
_version_ 1783310692779032576
author Li, Li
Pielsticker, Colin
Han, Zifeng
Kubasová, Tereza
Rychlik, Ivan
Kaspers, Bernd
Rautenschlein, Silke
author_facet Li, Li
Pielsticker, Colin
Han, Zifeng
Kubasová, Tereza
Rychlik, Ivan
Kaspers, Bernd
Rautenschlein, Silke
author_sort Li, Li
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Campylobacter jejuni is considered as a chicken commensal. The gut microbiota and the immune status of the host may affect its colonization. Infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) is an immunosuppressive virus of chickens, which allows secondary pathogens to invade or exacerbates their pathogenesis. To investigate the effect of IBDV-induced immunosuppression on the pathogenesis of C. jejuni, broiler chickens were inoculated with a very virulent (vv) strain of IBDV at 14 days post hatch followed by C. jejuni inoculation at 7 (Experiment A) or 9 (Experiment B) days post virus (IBDV) inoculation. RESULTS: vvIBDV-infection led to a depression in caecal lamina propria B lymphocytes and the anti-C. jejuni-antibody response starting at 14 days post C. jejuni inoculation (pbi). The C. jejuni-colonization pattern was comparable between mono-inoculated groups of both experiments, but it varied for vvIBDV + C. jejuni co-inoculated groups. In Experiment A significant higher numbers of colony forming units (CFU) of C. jejuni were detected in the caecum of co-inoculated birds compared to C. jejuni-mono-inoculated birds in the early phase after C. jejuni-inoculation. In Experiment B the clearance phase was affected in the co-inoculated group with significantly higher CFU at 21 days pbi compared to the mono-inoculated group (P < 0.05). No major differences were seen in numbers local lamina propria T lymphocyte populations between C. jejuni-inoculated groups with or without vvIBDV-infection. Interestingly, both pathogens affected the microbiota composition. The consequences of these microflora changes for the host have to be elucidated further. CONCLUSION: Our data suggests that the timing between viral and bacterial infection might affect the outcome of C. jejuni colonization differently. Our results confirm previous studies that anti-Campylobacter-antibodies may specifically be important for the clearance phase of the bacteria. Therefore, as vvIBDV is widely distributed in the field, it may have a significant impact on the colonization and shedding rate of C. jejuni in commercial poultry flocks. Subsequently, successful IBDV-control strategies may indirectly also benefit the gut-health of chickens. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13099-018-0241-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5877392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58773922018-04-02 Infectious bursal disease virus inoculation infection modifies Campylobacter jejuni–host interaction in broilers Li, Li Pielsticker, Colin Han, Zifeng Kubasová, Tereza Rychlik, Ivan Kaspers, Bernd Rautenschlein, Silke Gut Pathog Research BACKGROUND: Campylobacter jejuni is considered as a chicken commensal. The gut microbiota and the immune status of the host may affect its colonization. Infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) is an immunosuppressive virus of chickens, which allows secondary pathogens to invade or exacerbates their pathogenesis. To investigate the effect of IBDV-induced immunosuppression on the pathogenesis of C. jejuni, broiler chickens were inoculated with a very virulent (vv) strain of IBDV at 14 days post hatch followed by C. jejuni inoculation at 7 (Experiment A) or 9 (Experiment B) days post virus (IBDV) inoculation. RESULTS: vvIBDV-infection led to a depression in caecal lamina propria B lymphocytes and the anti-C. jejuni-antibody response starting at 14 days post C. jejuni inoculation (pbi). The C. jejuni-colonization pattern was comparable between mono-inoculated groups of both experiments, but it varied for vvIBDV + C. jejuni co-inoculated groups. In Experiment A significant higher numbers of colony forming units (CFU) of C. jejuni were detected in the caecum of co-inoculated birds compared to C. jejuni-mono-inoculated birds in the early phase after C. jejuni-inoculation. In Experiment B the clearance phase was affected in the co-inoculated group with significantly higher CFU at 21 days pbi compared to the mono-inoculated group (P < 0.05). No major differences were seen in numbers local lamina propria T lymphocyte populations between C. jejuni-inoculated groups with or without vvIBDV-infection. Interestingly, both pathogens affected the microbiota composition. The consequences of these microflora changes for the host have to be elucidated further. CONCLUSION: Our data suggests that the timing between viral and bacterial infection might affect the outcome of C. jejuni colonization differently. Our results confirm previous studies that anti-Campylobacter-antibodies may specifically be important for the clearance phase of the bacteria. Therefore, as vvIBDV is widely distributed in the field, it may have a significant impact on the colonization and shedding rate of C. jejuni in commercial poultry flocks. Subsequently, successful IBDV-control strategies may indirectly also benefit the gut-health of chickens. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13099-018-0241-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5877392/ /pubmed/29610580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13099-018-0241-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Li, Li
Pielsticker, Colin
Han, Zifeng
Kubasová, Tereza
Rychlik, Ivan
Kaspers, Bernd
Rautenschlein, Silke
Infectious bursal disease virus inoculation infection modifies Campylobacter jejuni–host interaction in broilers
title Infectious bursal disease virus inoculation infection modifies Campylobacter jejuni–host interaction in broilers
title_full Infectious bursal disease virus inoculation infection modifies Campylobacter jejuni–host interaction in broilers
title_fullStr Infectious bursal disease virus inoculation infection modifies Campylobacter jejuni–host interaction in broilers
title_full_unstemmed Infectious bursal disease virus inoculation infection modifies Campylobacter jejuni–host interaction in broilers
title_short Infectious bursal disease virus inoculation infection modifies Campylobacter jejuni–host interaction in broilers
title_sort infectious bursal disease virus inoculation infection modifies campylobacter jejuni–host interaction in broilers
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5877392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29610580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13099-018-0241-1
work_keys_str_mv AT lili infectiousbursaldiseasevirusinoculationinfectionmodifiescampylobacterjejunihostinteractioninbroilers
AT pielstickercolin infectiousbursaldiseasevirusinoculationinfectionmodifiescampylobacterjejunihostinteractioninbroilers
AT hanzifeng infectiousbursaldiseasevirusinoculationinfectionmodifiescampylobacterjejunihostinteractioninbroilers
AT kubasovatereza infectiousbursaldiseasevirusinoculationinfectionmodifiescampylobacterjejunihostinteractioninbroilers
AT rychlikivan infectiousbursaldiseasevirusinoculationinfectionmodifiescampylobacterjejunihostinteractioninbroilers
AT kaspersbernd infectiousbursaldiseasevirusinoculationinfectionmodifiescampylobacterjejunihostinteractioninbroilers
AT rautenschleinsilke infectiousbursaldiseasevirusinoculationinfectionmodifiescampylobacterjejunihostinteractioninbroilers