Cargando…

Protecting study participants in emergency research: is community consultation before trial commencement enough?

BACKGROUND: This article presents the results of a community consultation (CC) process completed in Toronto, Ontario, using a random digit dialling technique, on the attitudes and perceptions of the public toward the use of exception from informed consent when conducting emergency research involving...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Henry, Blair, Perez, Adic, Trpcic, Sandy, Rizoli, Sandro, Nascimento, Barto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5877900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29766088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2017-000084
_version_ 1783310786836299776
author Henry, Blair
Perez, Adic
Trpcic, Sandy
Rizoli, Sandro
Nascimento, Barto
author_facet Henry, Blair
Perez, Adic
Trpcic, Sandy
Rizoli, Sandro
Nascimento, Barto
author_sort Henry, Blair
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This article presents the results of a community consultation (CC) process completed in Toronto, Ontario, using a random digit dialling technique, on the attitudes and perceptions of the public toward the use of exception from informed consent when conducting emergency research involving the use of massive blood transfusions. METHODS: In 2012, our hospital conducted a CC, using a random digit dialling technique, to elicit the attitudes and perceptions of the public toward the use of an exemption from informed consent for an upcoming clinical trial. A total of 500 participants from high violent crime areas were interviewed as part of this consultation. RESULTS: The response rate for the telephone survey was 54%. Participants indicated a personal acceptance rate of 76%, acceptance of the justification for the exception to consent at 81%, thatthe study would meet the best interest of patients and the community at 81% and that youth (between 15 and 18 years) could be enrolled at 71%. When offered, no participant requested an opt-out wrist band to avoid being enrolled in this study. DISCUSSION: The use of violent crime neighborhoods to locate at risk communities was not effective in identifying the appropriate community of interest for this study. Though only representing a small subpopulation from a large Canadian city, the attitudes noted here is suggestive that Canadians may have a similar level of acceptance as the US based on published studies. However, given the resources needed to undertake this process and that in the end it did not elicit any useful feedback or recommendations for enhancing the safety of participants, the future use of phone surveys as a means of engaging communities should be reconsidered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE (LEVEL V): This is a retrospective subanalysis of a CC using a randomized phone dialling technique from a site prior to the start of the Pragmatic Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios Trial. The CC was not designed specifically for research purposes and as such reflect only a case study from a single center. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Pre-result, NCT01545232.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5877900
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58779002018-05-14 Protecting study participants in emergency research: is community consultation before trial commencement enough? Henry, Blair Perez, Adic Trpcic, Sandy Rizoli, Sandro Nascimento, Barto Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Original Article BACKGROUND: This article presents the results of a community consultation (CC) process completed in Toronto, Ontario, using a random digit dialling technique, on the attitudes and perceptions of the public toward the use of exception from informed consent when conducting emergency research involving the use of massive blood transfusions. METHODS: In 2012, our hospital conducted a CC, using a random digit dialling technique, to elicit the attitudes and perceptions of the public toward the use of an exemption from informed consent for an upcoming clinical trial. A total of 500 participants from high violent crime areas were interviewed as part of this consultation. RESULTS: The response rate for the telephone survey was 54%. Participants indicated a personal acceptance rate of 76%, acceptance of the justification for the exception to consent at 81%, thatthe study would meet the best interest of patients and the community at 81% and that youth (between 15 and 18 years) could be enrolled at 71%. When offered, no participant requested an opt-out wrist band to avoid being enrolled in this study. DISCUSSION: The use of violent crime neighborhoods to locate at risk communities was not effective in identifying the appropriate community of interest for this study. Though only representing a small subpopulation from a large Canadian city, the attitudes noted here is suggestive that Canadians may have a similar level of acceptance as the US based on published studies. However, given the resources needed to undertake this process and that in the end it did not elicit any useful feedback or recommendations for enhancing the safety of participants, the future use of phone surveys as a means of engaging communities should be reconsidered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE (LEVEL V): This is a retrospective subanalysis of a CC using a randomized phone dialling technique from a site prior to the start of the Pragmatic Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios Trial. The CC was not designed specifically for research purposes and as such reflect only a case study from a single center. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Pre-result, NCT01545232. Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open 2017-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5877900/ /pubmed/29766088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2017-000084 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Henry, Blair
Perez, Adic
Trpcic, Sandy
Rizoli, Sandro
Nascimento, Barto
Protecting study participants in emergency research: is community consultation before trial commencement enough?
title Protecting study participants in emergency research: is community consultation before trial commencement enough?
title_full Protecting study participants in emergency research: is community consultation before trial commencement enough?
title_fullStr Protecting study participants in emergency research: is community consultation before trial commencement enough?
title_full_unstemmed Protecting study participants in emergency research: is community consultation before trial commencement enough?
title_short Protecting study participants in emergency research: is community consultation before trial commencement enough?
title_sort protecting study participants in emergency research: is community consultation before trial commencement enough?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5877900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29766088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2017-000084
work_keys_str_mv AT henryblair protectingstudyparticipantsinemergencyresearchiscommunityconsultationbeforetrialcommencementenough
AT perezadic protectingstudyparticipantsinemergencyresearchiscommunityconsultationbeforetrialcommencementenough
AT trpcicsandy protectingstudyparticipantsinemergencyresearchiscommunityconsultationbeforetrialcommencementenough
AT rizolisandro protectingstudyparticipantsinemergencyresearchiscommunityconsultationbeforetrialcommencementenough
AT nascimentobarto protectingstudyparticipantsinemergencyresearchiscommunityconsultationbeforetrialcommencementenough