Cargando…

Benefit Versus Risk Assessment of Rotavirus Vaccination in France: A Simulation and Modeling Analysis

INTRODUCTION: Two vaccines against rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) in young children, Rotarix and RotaTeq, have been available in Europe since 2006. Vaccination against rotaviruses significantly reduces the burden of RVGE, but it is also associated with a very small increased risk of intussusceptio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ledent, Edouard, Arlegui, Hugo, Buyse, Hubert, Basile, Peter, Karkada, Naveen, Praet, Nicolas, Nachbaur, Gaëlle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5878204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29589230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40259-018-0273-6
_version_ 1783310819250929664
author Ledent, Edouard
Arlegui, Hugo
Buyse, Hubert
Basile, Peter
Karkada, Naveen
Praet, Nicolas
Nachbaur, Gaëlle
author_facet Ledent, Edouard
Arlegui, Hugo
Buyse, Hubert
Basile, Peter
Karkada, Naveen
Praet, Nicolas
Nachbaur, Gaëlle
author_sort Ledent, Edouard
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Two vaccines against rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) in young children, Rotarix and RotaTeq, have been available in Europe since 2006. Vaccination against rotaviruses significantly reduces the burden of RVGE, but it is also associated with a very small increased risk of intussusception. In a benefit–risk analysis, the prevented RVGE burden is weighed against the possible excess of intussusception. PURPOSE: The aim was to compare the estimated benefits and risks of Rotarix vaccination in France. METHODS: We estimated the benefits (vaccine-preventable RVGE hospitalizations and deaths) and risks (vaccine-caused intussusception hospitalizations and deaths) following two doses of Rotarix in a birth cohort of 791,183 followed for 3–5 years in France. We used data from peer-reviewed clinical and epidemiological studies or publications, and government statistics. RESULTS: Within the total number of French children below 5 years of age, we estimate vaccination could prevent a median 11,132 [95% credible interval (CI) 7842–14,408] RVGE hospitalizations and 7.43 (95% CI 3.27–14.68) RVGE deaths. At the same time, vaccination could cause an average of 6.86 (95% CI 2.25–38.37) intussusception hospitalizations and 0.0099 (95% CI 0.0024–0.060) intussusception deaths in the entire French birth cohort of infants below 1 year of age. Therefore, for every intussusception hospitalization and every intussusception death caused by vaccination, 1624 (95% CI 240–5243) RVGE hospitalizations and 743 (95% CI 93–3723) RVGE deaths are prevented, respectively, by vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: The vaccine-prevented RVGE hospitalizations and deaths (benefit) greatly outweigh the excess potentially vaccination-related cases of intussusception (risk), indicating a favorable benefit–risk balance for Rotarix in France. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40259-018-0273-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5878204
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58782042018-04-03 Benefit Versus Risk Assessment of Rotavirus Vaccination in France: A Simulation and Modeling Analysis Ledent, Edouard Arlegui, Hugo Buyse, Hubert Basile, Peter Karkada, Naveen Praet, Nicolas Nachbaur, Gaëlle BioDrugs Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: Two vaccines against rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) in young children, Rotarix and RotaTeq, have been available in Europe since 2006. Vaccination against rotaviruses significantly reduces the burden of RVGE, but it is also associated with a very small increased risk of intussusception. In a benefit–risk analysis, the prevented RVGE burden is weighed against the possible excess of intussusception. PURPOSE: The aim was to compare the estimated benefits and risks of Rotarix vaccination in France. METHODS: We estimated the benefits (vaccine-preventable RVGE hospitalizations and deaths) and risks (vaccine-caused intussusception hospitalizations and deaths) following two doses of Rotarix in a birth cohort of 791,183 followed for 3–5 years in France. We used data from peer-reviewed clinical and epidemiological studies or publications, and government statistics. RESULTS: Within the total number of French children below 5 years of age, we estimate vaccination could prevent a median 11,132 [95% credible interval (CI) 7842–14,408] RVGE hospitalizations and 7.43 (95% CI 3.27–14.68) RVGE deaths. At the same time, vaccination could cause an average of 6.86 (95% CI 2.25–38.37) intussusception hospitalizations and 0.0099 (95% CI 0.0024–0.060) intussusception deaths in the entire French birth cohort of infants below 1 year of age. Therefore, for every intussusception hospitalization and every intussusception death caused by vaccination, 1624 (95% CI 240–5243) RVGE hospitalizations and 743 (95% CI 93–3723) RVGE deaths are prevented, respectively, by vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: The vaccine-prevented RVGE hospitalizations and deaths (benefit) greatly outweigh the excess potentially vaccination-related cases of intussusception (risk), indicating a favorable benefit–risk balance for Rotarix in France. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40259-018-0273-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-03-27 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5878204/ /pubmed/29589230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40259-018-0273-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Ledent, Edouard
Arlegui, Hugo
Buyse, Hubert
Basile, Peter
Karkada, Naveen
Praet, Nicolas
Nachbaur, Gaëlle
Benefit Versus Risk Assessment of Rotavirus Vaccination in France: A Simulation and Modeling Analysis
title Benefit Versus Risk Assessment of Rotavirus Vaccination in France: A Simulation and Modeling Analysis
title_full Benefit Versus Risk Assessment of Rotavirus Vaccination in France: A Simulation and Modeling Analysis
title_fullStr Benefit Versus Risk Assessment of Rotavirus Vaccination in France: A Simulation and Modeling Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Benefit Versus Risk Assessment of Rotavirus Vaccination in France: A Simulation and Modeling Analysis
title_short Benefit Versus Risk Assessment of Rotavirus Vaccination in France: A Simulation and Modeling Analysis
title_sort benefit versus risk assessment of rotavirus vaccination in france: a simulation and modeling analysis
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5878204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29589230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40259-018-0273-6
work_keys_str_mv AT ledentedouard benefitversusriskassessmentofrotavirusvaccinationinfranceasimulationandmodelinganalysis
AT arleguihugo benefitversusriskassessmentofrotavirusvaccinationinfranceasimulationandmodelinganalysis
AT buysehubert benefitversusriskassessmentofrotavirusvaccinationinfranceasimulationandmodelinganalysis
AT basilepeter benefitversusriskassessmentofrotavirusvaccinationinfranceasimulationandmodelinganalysis
AT karkadanaveen benefitversusriskassessmentofrotavirusvaccinationinfranceasimulationandmodelinganalysis
AT praetnicolas benefitversusriskassessmentofrotavirusvaccinationinfranceasimulationandmodelinganalysis
AT nachbaurgaelle benefitversusriskassessmentofrotavirusvaccinationinfranceasimulationandmodelinganalysis