Cargando…
Are self-reported telemonitored blood pressure readings affected by end-digit preference: a prospective cohort study in Scotland
OBJECTIVE: Simple forms of blood pressure (BP) telemonitoring require patients to text readings to central servers creating an opportunity for both entry error and manipulation. We wished to determine if there was an apparent preference for particular end digits and entries which were just below tar...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5878245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29391369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019431 |
_version_ | 1783310820955914240 |
---|---|
author | Parker, Richard A Paterson, Mary Padfield, Paul Pinnock, Hilary Hanley, Janet Hammersley, Vicky S Steventon, Adam McKinstry, Brian |
author_facet | Parker, Richard A Paterson, Mary Padfield, Paul Pinnock, Hilary Hanley, Janet Hammersley, Vicky S Steventon, Adam McKinstry, Brian |
author_sort | Parker, Richard A |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Simple forms of blood pressure (BP) telemonitoring require patients to text readings to central servers creating an opportunity for both entry error and manipulation. We wished to determine if there was an apparent preference for particular end digits and entries which were just below target BPs which might suggest evidence of data manipulation. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study SETTING: 37 socioeconomically diverse primary care practices from South East Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: Patients were recruited with hypertension to a telemonitoring service in which patients submitted home BP readings by manually transcribing the measurements into text messages for transmission (‘patient-texted system’). These readings were compared with those from primary care patients with uncontrolled hypertension using a system in which readings were automatically transmitted, eliminating the possibility of manipulation of values (‘automatic-transmission system’). METHODS: A generalised estimating equations method was used to compare BP readings between the patient-texted and automatic-transmission systems, while taking into account clustering of readings within patients. RESULTS: A total of 44 150 BP readings were analysed on 1068 patients using the patient-texted system compared with 20 705 readings on 199 patients using the automatic-transmission system. Compared with the automatic-transmission data, the patient-texted data showed a significantly higher proportion of occurrences of both systolic and diastolic BP having a zero end digit (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.7 to 2.6) although incidence was <2% of readings. Similarly, there was a preference for systolic 134 and diastolic 84 (the threshold for alerts was 135/85) (134 systolic BP OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 1.8; 84 diastolic BP OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 1.9). CONCLUSION: End-digit preference for zero numbers and specific-value preference for readings just below the alert threshold exist among patients in self-reporting their BP using telemonitoring. However, the proportion of readings affected is small and unlikely to be clinically important. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN72614272; Post-results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5878245 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58782452018-04-02 Are self-reported telemonitored blood pressure readings affected by end-digit preference: a prospective cohort study in Scotland Parker, Richard A Paterson, Mary Padfield, Paul Pinnock, Hilary Hanley, Janet Hammersley, Vicky S Steventon, Adam McKinstry, Brian BMJ Open Research Methods OBJECTIVE: Simple forms of blood pressure (BP) telemonitoring require patients to text readings to central servers creating an opportunity for both entry error and manipulation. We wished to determine if there was an apparent preference for particular end digits and entries which were just below target BPs which might suggest evidence of data manipulation. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study SETTING: 37 socioeconomically diverse primary care practices from South East Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: Patients were recruited with hypertension to a telemonitoring service in which patients submitted home BP readings by manually transcribing the measurements into text messages for transmission (‘patient-texted system’). These readings were compared with those from primary care patients with uncontrolled hypertension using a system in which readings were automatically transmitted, eliminating the possibility of manipulation of values (‘automatic-transmission system’). METHODS: A generalised estimating equations method was used to compare BP readings between the patient-texted and automatic-transmission systems, while taking into account clustering of readings within patients. RESULTS: A total of 44 150 BP readings were analysed on 1068 patients using the patient-texted system compared with 20 705 readings on 199 patients using the automatic-transmission system. Compared with the automatic-transmission data, the patient-texted data showed a significantly higher proportion of occurrences of both systolic and diastolic BP having a zero end digit (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.7 to 2.6) although incidence was <2% of readings. Similarly, there was a preference for systolic 134 and diastolic 84 (the threshold for alerts was 135/85) (134 systolic BP OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 1.8; 84 diastolic BP OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 1.9). CONCLUSION: End-digit preference for zero numbers and specific-value preference for readings just below the alert threshold exist among patients in self-reporting their BP using telemonitoring. However, the proportion of readings affected is small and unlikely to be clinically important. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN72614272; Post-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5878245/ /pubmed/29391369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019431 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Research Methods Parker, Richard A Paterson, Mary Padfield, Paul Pinnock, Hilary Hanley, Janet Hammersley, Vicky S Steventon, Adam McKinstry, Brian Are self-reported telemonitored blood pressure readings affected by end-digit preference: a prospective cohort study in Scotland |
title | Are self-reported telemonitored blood pressure readings affected by end-digit preference: a prospective cohort study in Scotland |
title_full | Are self-reported telemonitored blood pressure readings affected by end-digit preference: a prospective cohort study in Scotland |
title_fullStr | Are self-reported telemonitored blood pressure readings affected by end-digit preference: a prospective cohort study in Scotland |
title_full_unstemmed | Are self-reported telemonitored blood pressure readings affected by end-digit preference: a prospective cohort study in Scotland |
title_short | Are self-reported telemonitored blood pressure readings affected by end-digit preference: a prospective cohort study in Scotland |
title_sort | are self-reported telemonitored blood pressure readings affected by end-digit preference: a prospective cohort study in scotland |
topic | Research Methods |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5878245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29391369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019431 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkerricharda areselfreportedtelemonitoredbloodpressurereadingsaffectedbyenddigitpreferenceaprospectivecohortstudyinscotland AT patersonmary areselfreportedtelemonitoredbloodpressurereadingsaffectedbyenddigitpreferenceaprospectivecohortstudyinscotland AT padfieldpaul areselfreportedtelemonitoredbloodpressurereadingsaffectedbyenddigitpreferenceaprospectivecohortstudyinscotland AT pinnockhilary areselfreportedtelemonitoredbloodpressurereadingsaffectedbyenddigitpreferenceaprospectivecohortstudyinscotland AT hanleyjanet areselfreportedtelemonitoredbloodpressurereadingsaffectedbyenddigitpreferenceaprospectivecohortstudyinscotland AT hammersleyvickys areselfreportedtelemonitoredbloodpressurereadingsaffectedbyenddigitpreferenceaprospectivecohortstudyinscotland AT steventonadam areselfreportedtelemonitoredbloodpressurereadingsaffectedbyenddigitpreferenceaprospectivecohortstudyinscotland AT mckinstrybrian areselfreportedtelemonitoredbloodpressurereadingsaffectedbyenddigitpreferenceaprospectivecohortstudyinscotland |