Cargando…

Normal saline instillation versus no normal saline instillation And lung Recruitment versus no lung recruitment with paediatric Endotracheal Suction: the NARES trial. A study protocol for a pilot, factorial randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Endotracheal suction (ETS) is a frequent and necessary airway intervention for the intubated child. The aim of ETS is to clear the endotracheal tube and airways of respiratory secretions; however, the methods of performing ETS are varied. Internationally a number of ETS treatments are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schults, Jessica A, Cooke, Marie, Long, Debbie A, Schibler, Andreas, Ware, Robert S, Mitchell, Marion L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5878246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29391372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019789
_version_ 1783310821196038144
author Schults, Jessica A
Cooke, Marie
Long, Debbie A
Schibler, Andreas
Ware, Robert S
Mitchell, Marion L
author_facet Schults, Jessica A
Cooke, Marie
Long, Debbie A
Schibler, Andreas
Ware, Robert S
Mitchell, Marion L
author_sort Schults, Jessica A
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Endotracheal suction (ETS) is a frequent and necessary airway intervention for the intubated child. The aim of ETS is to clear the endotracheal tube and airways of respiratory secretions; however, the methods of performing ETS are varied. Internationally a number of ETS treatments are in use. Many have not been rigorously evaluated in a randomised controlled trial setting, and it is uncertain whether any are associated with better outcomes for the critically ill child. With approximately 50% of paediatric intensive care admissions requiring intubation, ETS interventions that maximise the efficacy and minimise the complications of ETS could translate to improved health for substantial numbers of critically ill children, and significant cost savings. The primary aim of the study is to examine two ETS interventions, normal saline instillation and lung recruitment, to determine if it is feasible to conduct a full efficacy trial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: NARES (Normal saline instillation versus no normal saline instillation And lung Recruitment versus no lung recruitment with paediatric Endotracheal Suction) is a single-centre, pilot, factorial randomised controlled trial conducted in a tertiary referral paediatric centre in Brisbane, Australia. Children (aged 0–16 years) are eligible if they are intubated with an endotracheal tube and mechanically ventilated. Two intervention pairs will be compared using a 2×2 factorial design: (1) normal saline instillation versus no normal saline instillation; and (2) lung recruitment versus no lung recruitment. The primary outcome is study feasibility measured by a composite analysis of eligibility, recruitment, retention, protocol adherence and missing data. Secondary outcomes are ventilator-associated pneumonia, SpO(2)/FiO(2) ratio, lung compliance, end expiratory level and regional tidal volume. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval to conduct the research has been obtained. Dissemination of the research findings will be untaken, guided by the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement recommendations. Protocol content was guided by the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials 2013 statement. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12617000609358; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5878246
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58782462018-04-02 Normal saline instillation versus no normal saline instillation And lung Recruitment versus no lung recruitment with paediatric Endotracheal Suction: the NARES trial. A study protocol for a pilot, factorial randomised controlled trial Schults, Jessica A Cooke, Marie Long, Debbie A Schibler, Andreas Ware, Robert S Mitchell, Marion L BMJ Open Intensive Care INTRODUCTION: Endotracheal suction (ETS) is a frequent and necessary airway intervention for the intubated child. The aim of ETS is to clear the endotracheal tube and airways of respiratory secretions; however, the methods of performing ETS are varied. Internationally a number of ETS treatments are in use. Many have not been rigorously evaluated in a randomised controlled trial setting, and it is uncertain whether any are associated with better outcomes for the critically ill child. With approximately 50% of paediatric intensive care admissions requiring intubation, ETS interventions that maximise the efficacy and minimise the complications of ETS could translate to improved health for substantial numbers of critically ill children, and significant cost savings. The primary aim of the study is to examine two ETS interventions, normal saline instillation and lung recruitment, to determine if it is feasible to conduct a full efficacy trial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: NARES (Normal saline instillation versus no normal saline instillation And lung Recruitment versus no lung recruitment with paediatric Endotracheal Suction) is a single-centre, pilot, factorial randomised controlled trial conducted in a tertiary referral paediatric centre in Brisbane, Australia. Children (aged 0–16 years) are eligible if they are intubated with an endotracheal tube and mechanically ventilated. Two intervention pairs will be compared using a 2×2 factorial design: (1) normal saline instillation versus no normal saline instillation; and (2) lung recruitment versus no lung recruitment. The primary outcome is study feasibility measured by a composite analysis of eligibility, recruitment, retention, protocol adherence and missing data. Secondary outcomes are ventilator-associated pneumonia, SpO(2)/FiO(2) ratio, lung compliance, end expiratory level and regional tidal volume. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval to conduct the research has been obtained. Dissemination of the research findings will be untaken, guided by the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement recommendations. Protocol content was guided by the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials 2013 statement. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12617000609358; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5878246/ /pubmed/29391372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019789 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Intensive Care
Schults, Jessica A
Cooke, Marie
Long, Debbie A
Schibler, Andreas
Ware, Robert S
Mitchell, Marion L
Normal saline instillation versus no normal saline instillation And lung Recruitment versus no lung recruitment with paediatric Endotracheal Suction: the NARES trial. A study protocol for a pilot, factorial randomised controlled trial
title Normal saline instillation versus no normal saline instillation And lung Recruitment versus no lung recruitment with paediatric Endotracheal Suction: the NARES trial. A study protocol for a pilot, factorial randomised controlled trial
title_full Normal saline instillation versus no normal saline instillation And lung Recruitment versus no lung recruitment with paediatric Endotracheal Suction: the NARES trial. A study protocol for a pilot, factorial randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Normal saline instillation versus no normal saline instillation And lung Recruitment versus no lung recruitment with paediatric Endotracheal Suction: the NARES trial. A study protocol for a pilot, factorial randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Normal saline instillation versus no normal saline instillation And lung Recruitment versus no lung recruitment with paediatric Endotracheal Suction: the NARES trial. A study protocol for a pilot, factorial randomised controlled trial
title_short Normal saline instillation versus no normal saline instillation And lung Recruitment versus no lung recruitment with paediatric Endotracheal Suction: the NARES trial. A study protocol for a pilot, factorial randomised controlled trial
title_sort normal saline instillation versus no normal saline instillation and lung recruitment versus no lung recruitment with paediatric endotracheal suction: the nares trial. a study protocol for a pilot, factorial randomised controlled trial
topic Intensive Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5878246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29391372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019789
work_keys_str_mv AT schultsjessicaa normalsalineinstillationversusnonormalsalineinstillationandlungrecruitmentversusnolungrecruitmentwithpaediatricendotrachealsuctionthenarestrialastudyprotocolforapilotfactorialrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cookemarie normalsalineinstillationversusnonormalsalineinstillationandlungrecruitmentversusnolungrecruitmentwithpaediatricendotrachealsuctionthenarestrialastudyprotocolforapilotfactorialrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT longdebbiea normalsalineinstillationversusnonormalsalineinstillationandlungrecruitmentversusnolungrecruitmentwithpaediatricendotrachealsuctionthenarestrialastudyprotocolforapilotfactorialrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT schiblerandreas normalsalineinstillationversusnonormalsalineinstillationandlungrecruitmentversusnolungrecruitmentwithpaediatricendotrachealsuctionthenarestrialastudyprotocolforapilotfactorialrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wareroberts normalsalineinstillationversusnonormalsalineinstillationandlungrecruitmentversusnolungrecruitmentwithpaediatricendotrachealsuctionthenarestrialastudyprotocolforapilotfactorialrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mitchellmarionl normalsalineinstillationversusnonormalsalineinstillationandlungrecruitmentversusnolungrecruitmentwithpaediatricendotrachealsuctionthenarestrialastudyprotocolforapilotfactorialrandomisedcontrolledtrial